On Multidimensional Indices of Poverty
There has been a growing interest in what have come to be termed "multidimensional indices of poverty." Advocates for these new indices correctly point out that command over market goods is not all that matters to peoples' well-being...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20110228142416 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3346 |
Summary: | There has been a growing interest in
what have come to be termed "multidimensional indices
of poverty." Advocates for these new indices correctly
point out that command over market goods is not all that
matters to peoples' well-being, and that other factors
need to be considered when quantifying the extent of poverty
and informing policy making for fighting poverty. However,
the author argues that there are two poorly understood
issues in assessing these indices. First, does one believe
that any single index can ever be a sufficient statistic for
poverty assessments? Second, when aggregation is called for,
should it be done in the space of "attainments,"
using prices when appropriate, or that of
"deprivations," using weights set by the analyst?
The paper argues that the goal for future poverty monitoring
efforts should be to develop a credible set of multiple
indices, spanning the dimensions of poverty most relevant to
a specific setting, rather than a single multidimensional
index. When weights are needed, they shouldn't be set
solely by an analyst measuring poverty. Rather, they should
be, as much as possible, consistent with well-informed
choices made by poor people. |
---|