Relative Measures of Genocide Mortality : Benefits and Methodological Considerations of Using Siblings' Survival Data

When studying events such as the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda, for many researchers the first order question seems to be to find the best available data and methods to estimate the death toll, i.e. to provide a number of deaths in absolute terms. This makes sense since the staggering number of victims ov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: de Walque, Damien
Format: Journal Article
Published: Taylor and Francis 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/33287
id okr-10986-33287
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-332872021-05-25T10:54:40Z Relative Measures of Genocide Mortality : Benefits and Methodological Considerations of Using Siblings' Survival Data de Walque, Damien GENOCIDE MORTALITY SIBLING SURVIVAL DEMOGRAPHIC AND HEALTH SURVEY When studying events such as the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda, for many researchers the first order question seems to be to find the best available data and methods to estimate the death toll, i.e. to provide a number of deaths in absolute terms. This makes sense since the staggering number of victims over a very short period is one of the most shocking – and defining – features of such an historical event. This short note argues that while looking for an absolute death toll number is certainly an important and worthwhile research exercise, analyzing relative mortality numbers also provides valuable insights that might not be available when focusing on absolute numbers. By relative mortality I mean comparing mortality across different population segments such as by gender, by age group or socioeconomic categories (e.g. education levels, urban/rural background). Specifically, I will use the examples of the Khmer Rouge Period in Cambodia (1975-1978) and the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda to illustrate this argument and will rely on earlier studies to show how the sibling mortality schedule – a module collecting information about the date of birth, the sex and if relevant the date of death of all siblings of the respondent – contained in most of the well-known and commonly used Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) can be exploited to obtain reasonable and useful estimates of relative mortality. 2020-02-05T19:22:51Z 2020-02-05T19:22:51Z 2019-12-31 Journal Article Journal of Genocide Research 1462-3528 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/33287 CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Taylor and Francis Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Journal Article Cambodia Rwanda
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
topic GENOCIDE
MORTALITY
SIBLING SURVIVAL
DEMOGRAPHIC AND HEALTH SURVEY
spellingShingle GENOCIDE
MORTALITY
SIBLING SURVIVAL
DEMOGRAPHIC AND HEALTH SURVEY
de Walque, Damien
Relative Measures of Genocide Mortality : Benefits and Methodological Considerations of Using Siblings' Survival Data
geographic_facet Cambodia
Rwanda
description When studying events such as the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda, for many researchers the first order question seems to be to find the best available data and methods to estimate the death toll, i.e. to provide a number of deaths in absolute terms. This makes sense since the staggering number of victims over a very short period is one of the most shocking – and defining – features of such an historical event. This short note argues that while looking for an absolute death toll number is certainly an important and worthwhile research exercise, analyzing relative mortality numbers also provides valuable insights that might not be available when focusing on absolute numbers. By relative mortality I mean comparing mortality across different population segments such as by gender, by age group or socioeconomic categories (e.g. education levels, urban/rural background). Specifically, I will use the examples of the Khmer Rouge Period in Cambodia (1975-1978) and the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda to illustrate this argument and will rely on earlier studies to show how the sibling mortality schedule – a module collecting information about the date of birth, the sex and if relevant the date of death of all siblings of the respondent – contained in most of the well-known and commonly used Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) can be exploited to obtain reasonable and useful estimates of relative mortality.
format Journal Article
author de Walque, Damien
author_facet de Walque, Damien
author_sort de Walque, Damien
title Relative Measures of Genocide Mortality : Benefits and Methodological Considerations of Using Siblings' Survival Data
title_short Relative Measures of Genocide Mortality : Benefits and Methodological Considerations of Using Siblings' Survival Data
title_full Relative Measures of Genocide Mortality : Benefits and Methodological Considerations of Using Siblings' Survival Data
title_fullStr Relative Measures of Genocide Mortality : Benefits and Methodological Considerations of Using Siblings' Survival Data
title_full_unstemmed Relative Measures of Genocide Mortality : Benefits and Methodological Considerations of Using Siblings' Survival Data
title_sort relative measures of genocide mortality : benefits and methodological considerations of using siblings' survival data
publisher Taylor and Francis
publishDate 2020
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/33287
_version_ 1764478399755059200