The Microfinance Business Model: Enduring Subsidy and Modest Profit

Recent evidence suggests only modest social and economic impacts of microfinance. Favorable cost-benefit ratios then depend on low costs. This paper calculates the costs of microcredit and other elements of the microcredit business model using proprietary data on 1,335 microfinance institutions betw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cull, Robert, Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, Morduch, Jonathan
Format: Journal Article
Published: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/32775
id okr-10986-32775
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-327752021-05-25T10:54:37Z The Microfinance Business Model: Enduring Subsidy and Modest Profit Cull, Robert Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli Morduch, Jonathan MICROFINANCE MICROCREDIT POVERTY SUBSIDIES COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS COMMERCIALIZATION IMPLICIT SUBSIDY NONPROFIT Recent evidence suggests only modest social and economic impacts of microfinance. Favorable cost-benefit ratios then depend on low costs. This paper calculates the costs of microcredit and other elements of the microcredit business model using proprietary data on 1,335 microfinance institutions between 2005 and 2009, jointly serving 80.1 million borrowers. The costs of making small loans to poorer clients are high, and when revenues fall short of costs, subsidies are necessary to deliver services to those clients on a sustainable basis. Using a method that accounts for the opportunity costs of all forms of subsidy, the analysis finds that the median institution receives five cents of subsidy per dollar lent and $51 of subsidy per borrower (in PPP-adjusted terms). Relatively low levels of median subsidy suggest that even modest benefits of microcredit could yield impressive cost-benefit ratios. The distribution of subsidies is highly skewed, however: the average subsidy per dollar lent is 13 cents, and the average subsidy per borrower is $248. The data show that subsidies per borrower are substantially higher for commercial microfinance banks and some non-bank financial institutions that make relatively large loans. MFIs organized as non-governmental organizations (NGOs), in contrast, generally rely less on subsidy. 2019-12-04T20:59:40Z 2019-12-04T20:59:40Z 2018-06 Journal Article World Bank Economic Review 1564-698X http://hdl.handle.net/10986/32775 CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Journal Article
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
topic MICROFINANCE
MICROCREDIT
POVERTY
SUBSIDIES
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
COMMERCIALIZATION
IMPLICIT SUBSIDY
NONPROFIT
spellingShingle MICROFINANCE
MICROCREDIT
POVERTY
SUBSIDIES
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
COMMERCIALIZATION
IMPLICIT SUBSIDY
NONPROFIT
Cull, Robert
Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli
Morduch, Jonathan
The Microfinance Business Model: Enduring Subsidy and Modest Profit
description Recent evidence suggests only modest social and economic impacts of microfinance. Favorable cost-benefit ratios then depend on low costs. This paper calculates the costs of microcredit and other elements of the microcredit business model using proprietary data on 1,335 microfinance institutions between 2005 and 2009, jointly serving 80.1 million borrowers. The costs of making small loans to poorer clients are high, and when revenues fall short of costs, subsidies are necessary to deliver services to those clients on a sustainable basis. Using a method that accounts for the opportunity costs of all forms of subsidy, the analysis finds that the median institution receives five cents of subsidy per dollar lent and $51 of subsidy per borrower (in PPP-adjusted terms). Relatively low levels of median subsidy suggest that even modest benefits of microcredit could yield impressive cost-benefit ratios. The distribution of subsidies is highly skewed, however: the average subsidy per dollar lent is 13 cents, and the average subsidy per borrower is $248. The data show that subsidies per borrower are substantially higher for commercial microfinance banks and some non-bank financial institutions that make relatively large loans. MFIs organized as non-governmental organizations (NGOs), in contrast, generally rely less on subsidy.
format Journal Article
author Cull, Robert
Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli
Morduch, Jonathan
author_facet Cull, Robert
Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli
Morduch, Jonathan
author_sort Cull, Robert
title The Microfinance Business Model: Enduring Subsidy and Modest Profit
title_short The Microfinance Business Model: Enduring Subsidy and Modest Profit
title_full The Microfinance Business Model: Enduring Subsidy and Modest Profit
title_fullStr The Microfinance Business Model: Enduring Subsidy and Modest Profit
title_full_unstemmed The Microfinance Business Model: Enduring Subsidy and Modest Profit
title_sort microfinance business model: enduring subsidy and modest profit
publisher Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/32775
_version_ 1764477270787883008