Mozambique Cashew Reforms Revisited
Cashew policy reforms in Mozambique have been controversial. They are often invoked by critics as an illustration of how agricultural policy reforms supported by international financial institutions may fail to have their intended effects. This pap...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20120109160233 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3224 |
Summary: | Cashew policy reforms in Mozambique have
been controversial. They are often invoked by critics as an
illustration of how agricultural policy reforms supported by
international financial institutions may fail to have their
intended effects. This paper revisits the reforms and their
outcomes almost two decades later. While the reforms
resulted in higher producer prices and an increase in
output, lack of consensus on the specifics of the reforms
and associated non-price support arrangements created a
situation in which the sector was not able to withstand
international price shocks that ultimately led to a collapse
of both the processing industry and cashew production.
Non-price support by donors improved the efficiency of the
processing industry but this was not complemented by an
expansion in cashew nut supply as such support did not
extend to smallholder cashew producers. For the reforms to
have had their intended results, greater investment in --
and support to -- smallholder production was needed to
increase yields and overall output. Such a more
comprehensive approach to cashew policy reform would have
required a greater focus on achieving consensus on the
causes of the cashew sector's problems and agreement by
all stakeholders on a common institutional framework for
pricing and non-price support. |
---|