Reputation Matters : Spillover Effects in the Enforcement of US SPS Measures
This paper uses a novel dataset on United States food import refusals to show that reputation is an important factor in the enforcement of sanitary and phytosanitary measures. The strongest reputation effect comes from a country's own history...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20120105104752 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3220 |
Summary: | This paper uses a novel dataset on
United States food import refusals to show that reputation
is an important factor in the enforcement of sanitary and
phytosanitary measures. The strongest reputation effect
comes from a country's own history of compliance in
relation to a particular product. The odds of at least one
import refusal in the current year increase by more than 300
percent if there was a refusal in the preceding year, after
controlling for other factors. However, the data are also
suggestive of the existence of two sets of spillovers.
First, import refusals are less likely if there is an
established history of compliance in relation to other goods
in the same sector. Second, an established history of
compliance in relation to the same product by neighboring
countries also helps reduce the number of import refusals.
These findings have important policy implications for
exporters of agricultural products, especially in
middle-income countries. In particular, they highlight the
importance of a comprehensive approach to upgrading
standards systems, focusing on sectors rather than
individual products, as well as the possible benefits that
can come from regional cooperation in building sanitary and
phytosanitary compliance capacity. |
---|