IDA’s Crisis Response Window : Lessons from Independent Evaluation Group Evaluations
From the 15th replenishment of the International Development Association (IDA15)through IDA18, the Crisis Response Window (CRW) evolved from a focus on economicshocks to include two other types of crises—natural disasters and public healthemergenci...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/211301554826093564/IDA-s-Crisis-Response-Window-Lessons-from-IEG-Evaluations http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31568 |
id |
okr-10986-31568 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-315682021-05-25T10:54:37Z IDA’s Crisis Response Window : Lessons from Independent Evaluation Group Evaluations Independent Evaluation Group CRISIS MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL CRISES INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ECONOMIC SHOCKS NATURAL DISASTERS PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES EMERGENCY FINANCE From the 15th replenishment of the International Development Association (IDA15)through IDA18, the Crisis Response Window (CRW) evolved from a focus on economicshocks to include two other types of crises—natural disasters and public healthemergencies. The CRW was set up as a pilot under IDA15 to address repercussionsrelated to the global financial crisis on IDA countries. When established as a permanent part of IDA, it was amended to address the impact of natural disasters in addition to economic shocks. CRW coverage was expanded to include public health emergencies when the Ebola crisis erupted in 2014. This IEG synthesis paper takes stock of experience with IDA’s CRW, making use of IEG evaluative evidence. The paper synthesizes findings from existing evaluations and information on CRW performance during its pilot stage under IDA15 and subsequent IDA cycles, to inform stakeholders and promote learning. The audience for this paper is primarily internal, including management, Executive Directors (including the Committee on Development Effectiveness), and IDA deputies. 2019-04-22T21:17:09Z 2019-04-22T21:17:09Z 2019-04-09 Report http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/211301554826093564/IDA-s-Crisis-Response-Window-Lessons-from-IEG-Evaluations http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31568 English CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English |
topic |
CRISIS MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL CRISES INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ECONOMIC SHOCKS NATURAL DISASTERS PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES EMERGENCY FINANCE |
spellingShingle |
CRISIS MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL CRISES INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ECONOMIC SHOCKS NATURAL DISASTERS PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES EMERGENCY FINANCE Independent Evaluation Group IDA’s Crisis Response Window : Lessons from Independent Evaluation Group Evaluations |
description |
From the 15th replenishment of the
International Development Association (IDA15)through IDA18,
the Crisis Response Window (CRW) evolved from a focus on
economicshocks to include two other types of crises—natural
disasters and public healthemergencies. The CRW was set up
as a pilot under IDA15 to address repercussionsrelated to
the global financial crisis on IDA countries. When
established as a permanent part of IDA, it was amended to
address the impact of natural disasters in addition to
economic shocks. CRW coverage was expanded to include public
health emergencies when the Ebola crisis erupted in 2014.
This IEG synthesis paper takes stock of experience with
IDA’s CRW, making use of IEG evaluative evidence. The paper
synthesizes findings from existing evaluations and
information on CRW performance during its pilot stage under
IDA15 and subsequent IDA cycles, to inform stakeholders and
promote learning. The audience for this paper is primarily
internal, including management, Executive Directors
(including the Committee on Development Effectiveness), and
IDA deputies. |
format |
Report |
author |
Independent Evaluation Group |
author_facet |
Independent Evaluation Group |
author_sort |
Independent Evaluation Group |
title |
IDA’s Crisis Response Window : Lessons from Independent Evaluation Group Evaluations |
title_short |
IDA’s Crisis Response Window : Lessons from Independent Evaluation Group Evaluations |
title_full |
IDA’s Crisis Response Window : Lessons from Independent Evaluation Group Evaluations |
title_fullStr |
IDA’s Crisis Response Window : Lessons from Independent Evaluation Group Evaluations |
title_full_unstemmed |
IDA’s Crisis Response Window : Lessons from Independent Evaluation Group Evaluations |
title_sort |
ida’s crisis response window : lessons from independent evaluation group evaluations |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/211301554826093564/IDA-s-Crisis-Response-Window-Lessons-from-IEG-Evaluations http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31568 |
_version_ |
1764474623314886656 |