A Systematic Tale of Two Differing Reviews : Evaluating the Evidence on Public and Private Sector Quality of Primary Care in Low and Middle Income Countries
Systematic reviews are powerful tools for summarizing vast amounts of data in controversial areas; but their utility is limited by methodological choices and assumptions. Two systematic reviews of literature on the quality of private sector primary care in low and middle income countries (LMIC), pub...
Main Authors: | Coarasa, Jorge, Das, Jishnu, Gummerson, Elizabeth, Bitton, Asaf |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Published: |
Springer
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31372 |
Similar Items
-
Primary Care for the Poor : The Potential of Micro-Health Markets to Improve Care
by: Coarasa, Jorge, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Ethnics in primary care
by: Sugarman
Published: (2000) -
Provider Payment Reforms for Improved Primary Health Care in Romania
by: Chukwuma, Adanna, et al.
Published: (2021) -
20 common problems in primary care
Published: (1999) -
Invitations and Incentives for Primary Care Screenings in Armenia
by: World Bank
Published: (2020)