Are Trade Preferences a Panacea? The Export Impact of the African Growth and Opportunity Act
Does “infant industry” preferential access durably boost exports? Using country-product-year data for 1992–2017 and triple-differences regressions, we show that the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) enhanced apparel exports of African countries on average. But the impact leveled off aft...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/685341550595914166/Are-Trade-Preferences-a-Panacea-The-African-Growth-and-Opportunity-Act-and-African-Exports http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31316 |
Summary: | Does “infant industry” preferential access durably boost
exports? Using country-product-year data for 1992–2017
and triple-differences regressions, we show that the African
Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) enhanced apparel
exports of African countries on average. But the impact
leveled off after the Multi-Fiber Arrangement unleashed
competition from Asian countries. Furthermore, the
positive average impact masks regional heterogeneity: East
Africa’s late-bloomers offset Southern Africa’s boom-bust
pattern. Firm-level data reveal that even East Africa’s export
growth was driven by entrants rather than incumbents who
received large preference margins during the early AGOA
years. Overall, the authors find little evidence that preferences durably boosted exports. |
---|