Public Investment Management in Contexts of Fragility, Conflict & Violence – Part 2

The PIM Assessment resulted in the establishment of an Action Plan to strengthen the system. Given weak institutional capacity and limited resources, the Plan should include quick-win options where possible, particularly in the early recovery phase...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cuvillier, Emmanuel, Chaouali, Rafika, Mroczka, Fabienne
Format: Brief
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/289701550247371408/Public-Investment-Management-PIM-in-Contexts-of-Fragility-Conflict-Violence-FCV-Part-2
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31298
id okr-10986-31298
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-312982021-05-25T10:54:36Z Public Investment Management in Contexts of Fragility, Conflict & Violence – Part 2 Cuvillier, Emmanuel Chaouali, Rafika Mroczka, Fabienne PUBLIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS FRAGILE AND CONFLICT-AFFECTED STATES CONFLICT AND VIOLENCE SECURITY AND DEVELOPMENT PEACE The PIM Assessment resulted in the establishment of an Action Plan to strengthen the system. Given weak institutional capacity and limited resources, the Plan should include quick-win options where possible, particularly in the early recovery phase. Evidence shows that the process by which projects are delivered (scale, community involvement, expertise of project managers, etc.) can be more important than getting projects built quickly. This is an important balancing act to consider. A well-sequenced short-, medium- and long-term PIM Action Plan can be organized as follows: i) Formalize the institutional setting (establishing management functions inside the PIM cycle); ii) Develop capacity building in project design, appraisal and selection; iii) Improve capital investment project design, appraisal and selection; iv) Enhance the legal and regulatory framework of the PIM system; v) Improve process registration of projects via an Integrated Bank of Projects (IBP); vi) Establish regularly revisited project selection and prioritization criteria; vii) Formalize use of key performance indicators; and viii) Improve PIP–PPP in project management and ex-post evaluation. 2019-02-15T19:43:45Z 2019-02-15T19:43:45Z 2019-02 Brief http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/289701550247371408/Public-Investment-Management-PIM-in-Contexts-of-Fragility-Conflict-Violence-FCV-Part-2 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31298 English MENA Knowledge and Learning Quick Notes;No. 174 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Brief Middle East and North Africa Afghanistan Haiti Iraq
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic PUBLIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
FRAGILE AND CONFLICT-AFFECTED STATES
CONFLICT AND VIOLENCE
SECURITY AND DEVELOPMENT
PEACE
spellingShingle PUBLIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
FRAGILE AND CONFLICT-AFFECTED STATES
CONFLICT AND VIOLENCE
SECURITY AND DEVELOPMENT
PEACE
Cuvillier, Emmanuel
Chaouali, Rafika
Mroczka, Fabienne
Public Investment Management in Contexts of Fragility, Conflict & Violence – Part 2
geographic_facet Middle East and North Africa
Afghanistan
Haiti
Iraq
relation MENA Knowledge and Learning Quick Notes;No. 174
description The PIM Assessment resulted in the establishment of an Action Plan to strengthen the system. Given weak institutional capacity and limited resources, the Plan should include quick-win options where possible, particularly in the early recovery phase. Evidence shows that the process by which projects are delivered (scale, community involvement, expertise of project managers, etc.) can be more important than getting projects built quickly. This is an important balancing act to consider. A well-sequenced short-, medium- and long-term PIM Action Plan can be organized as follows: i) Formalize the institutional setting (establishing management functions inside the PIM cycle); ii) Develop capacity building in project design, appraisal and selection; iii) Improve capital investment project design, appraisal and selection; iv) Enhance the legal and regulatory framework of the PIM system; v) Improve process registration of projects via an Integrated Bank of Projects (IBP); vi) Establish regularly revisited project selection and prioritization criteria; vii) Formalize use of key performance indicators; and viii) Improve PIP–PPP in project management and ex-post evaluation.
format Brief
author Cuvillier, Emmanuel
Chaouali, Rafika
Mroczka, Fabienne
author_facet Cuvillier, Emmanuel
Chaouali, Rafika
Mroczka, Fabienne
author_sort Cuvillier, Emmanuel
title Public Investment Management in Contexts of Fragility, Conflict & Violence – Part 2
title_short Public Investment Management in Contexts of Fragility, Conflict & Violence – Part 2
title_full Public Investment Management in Contexts of Fragility, Conflict & Violence – Part 2
title_fullStr Public Investment Management in Contexts of Fragility, Conflict & Violence – Part 2
title_full_unstemmed Public Investment Management in Contexts of Fragility, Conflict & Violence – Part 2
title_sort public investment management in contexts of fragility, conflict & violence – part 2
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2019
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/289701550247371408/Public-Investment-Management-PIM-in-Contexts-of-Fragility-Conflict-Violence-FCV-Part-2
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31298
_version_ 1764474005003173888