Managing Coal Mine Closure : Achieving a Just Transition for All
Over the last half century, large-scale changes to coal industries across Europe, and more recently in the United States and China, have resulted in as many as 4 million coal workers losing their jobs. The main drivers of these changes are mine mec...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Report |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/484541544643269894/Managing-Coal-Mine-Closure-Achieving-a-Just-Transition-for-All http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31020 |
| id |
okr-10986-31020 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| spelling |
okr-10986-310202021-05-25T09:20:15Z Managing Coal Mine Closure : Achieving a Just Transition for All World Bank Group COAL JOB LOSS MINE CLOSURE TEMPORARY INCOME SUPPORT ACTIVE LABOR MARKET PROGRAM TRADE ADJUSTMENT COSTS CLIMATE POLICY ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ENERGY EFFICIENCY MINE MECHANIZATION CLEAN ENERGY SHALE GAS Over the last half century, large-scale changes to coal industries across Europe, and more recently in the United States and China, have resulted in as many as 4 million coal workers losing their jobs. The main drivers of these changes are mine mechanization, government policies and competition from other fuels in downstream energy demand markets. At present, economies in Asia, Eastern Europe, and Africa face these same drivers of change, with large job losses already taking place in China, and with other large coal producing countries in Asia likely to follow. Lessons drawn from the experiences of the Russian Federation (Russia), Ukraine, Poland, and Romania from 1994 to 2012, complemented by data on impacts of coal industry adjustment in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, the United States, and China, show that job losses not only take place as the industry contracts but even if production is increasing. The mitigation of social conflict and economic distress are of grave concern as globally the coal industry enters a new era of downsizing. The objective of this report is to share with governments lessons learned regardingcoal mine closure. Indeed, the full set of coal mine closure issues is diverse with few positive case studies to date to draw on. The complexity of technical issues and vested interests along with the myriad of potential risks which may unfold will require combining time-tested and new approaches, and applying a broad array of skills. In this issues paper, we have sought to identifylessons from the past that can guide policy makers for more successful future mine closures. Nine lessons learned are presented for government consideration, drawn from three sets of literature. First, analysis from coal industry adjustment and downsizing experiences in Russia, Ukraine, Poland, and Romania from 1994 to 2012 where interventions ranged from preparatory diagnosticand technical studies to planning and financing of eventual closure programs. Second, observations and insights on impacts from coal industry adjustment in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, the United States, and China. Third, evidence-based interventions that have helped to mitigate potential negative social and labor impacts from mass job losses in other industries. 2018-12-18T22:42:13Z 2018-12-18T22:42:13Z 2018-11 Report http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/484541544643269894/Managing-Coal-Mine-Closure-Achieving-a-Just-Transition-for-All http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31020 English CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work :: Energy Study Economic & Sector Work Russian Federation United Kingdom United States |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
Digital Repositories |
| building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
| collection |
World Bank |
| language |
English |
| topic |
COAL JOB LOSS MINE CLOSURE TEMPORARY INCOME SUPPORT ACTIVE LABOR MARKET PROGRAM TRADE ADJUSTMENT COSTS CLIMATE POLICY ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ENERGY EFFICIENCY MINE MECHANIZATION CLEAN ENERGY SHALE GAS |
| spellingShingle |
COAL JOB LOSS MINE CLOSURE TEMPORARY INCOME SUPPORT ACTIVE LABOR MARKET PROGRAM TRADE ADJUSTMENT COSTS CLIMATE POLICY ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ENERGY EFFICIENCY MINE MECHANIZATION CLEAN ENERGY SHALE GAS World Bank Group Managing Coal Mine Closure : Achieving a Just Transition for All |
| geographic_facet |
Russian Federation United Kingdom United States |
| description |
Over the last half century, large-scale
changes to coal industries across Europe, and more recently
in the United States and China, have resulted in as many as
4 million coal workers losing their jobs. The main drivers
of these changes are mine mechanization, government policies
and competition from other fuels in downstream energy demand
markets. At present, economies in Asia, Eastern Europe, and
Africa face these same drivers of change, with large job
losses already taking place in China, and with other large
coal producing countries in Asia likely to follow. Lessons
drawn from the experiences of the Russian Federation
(Russia), Ukraine, Poland, and Romania from 1994 to 2012,
complemented by data on impacts of coal industry adjustment
in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, the United States,
and China, show that job losses not only take place as the
industry contracts but even if production is increasing. The
mitigation of social conflict and economic distress are of
grave concern as globally the coal industry enters a new era
of downsizing. The objective of this report is to share
with governments lessons learned regardingcoal mine closure.
Indeed, the full set of coal mine closure issues is diverse
with few positive case studies to date to draw on. The
complexity of technical issues and vested interests along
with the myriad of potential risks which may unfold will
require combining time-tested and new approaches, and
applying a broad array of skills. In this issues paper, we
have sought to identifylessons from the past that can guide
policy makers for more successful future mine closures. Nine
lessons learned are presented for government consideration,
drawn from three sets of literature. First, analysis from
coal industry adjustment and downsizing experiences in
Russia, Ukraine, Poland, and Romania from 1994 to 2012 where
interventions ranged from preparatory diagnosticand
technical studies to planning and financing of eventual
closure programs. Second, observations and insights on
impacts from coal industry adjustment in the United Kingdom,
the Netherlands, the United States, and China. Third,
evidence-based interventions that have helped to mitigate
potential negative social and labor impacts from mass job
losses in other industries. |
| format |
Report |
| author |
World Bank Group |
| author_facet |
World Bank Group |
| author_sort |
World Bank Group |
| title |
Managing Coal Mine Closure : Achieving a Just Transition for All |
| title_short |
Managing Coal Mine Closure : Achieving a Just Transition for All |
| title_full |
Managing Coal Mine Closure : Achieving a Just Transition for All |
| title_fullStr |
Managing Coal Mine Closure : Achieving a Just Transition for All |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Managing Coal Mine Closure : Achieving a Just Transition for All |
| title_sort |
managing coal mine closure : achieving a just transition for all |
| publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/484541544643269894/Managing-Coal-Mine-Closure-Achieving-a-Just-Transition-for-All http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31020 |
| _version_ |
1764473410415493120 |