Taking Stock of the Political Economy of Power Sector Reforms in Developing Countries : A Literature Review

The power sector reform experiences of developing countries vary greatly. To help explain this from a political economy perspective, this paper reviews several dozen statistical analyses, multi-country case studies, and development practice publica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee, Alan David, Usman, Zainab
Format: Working Paper
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/431981531320704737/Taking-stock-of-the-political-economy-of-power-sector-reforms-in-developing-countries-a-literature-review
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29991
id okr-10986-29991
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-299912022-09-19T12:17:29Z Taking Stock of the Political Economy of Power Sector Reforms in Developing Countries : A Literature Review Lee, Alan David Usman, Zainab POWER SECTOR REFORM PUBLIC UTILITIES POLITICAL ECONOMY ELECTRICITY PUBLIC INVESTMENT INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT EMERGING MARKET ECONOMIES DEVELOPING COUNTRIES REGULATION UNBUNDLING CLEAN ENERGY The power sector reform experiences of developing countries vary greatly. To help explain this from a political economy perspective, this paper reviews several dozen statistical analyses, multi-country case studies, and development practice publications. The frame of reference is the model of market-oriented reforms that became a global norm in the 1990s. Findings are organized in terms of the history, theory, motives, processes and outcomes of reforms. Market orientation emerged around the 1980s as part of a shift in economic theory and policy away from state control, and was expected to improve efficiency and investments. Reform advocates never took political economy issues into full consideration. Yet, policy makers have had sociopolitical as well as technical motives for reform, such as crisis response. International norms and competition for foreign investment and trade pulled governments to model reforms, while development partners pushed them as a condition of aid. Reform implementation has been characterized by strong tensions among different public and private interests. Concretely, 1990s model reforms were based on a logic of depoliticizing pricing and investment decisions; often placing policy makers in a conflict of interest situation. Thus, the political costs and risks of reform have often exceeded the benefits perceived by local decision makers, especially as reforms did not generally result in immediate benefits for citizens. In practice, incremental, inclusive processes may be better than quick and stealthy reforms that sidestep stakeholders' concerns. While there was limited evidence of efficacy at the time the reforms were implemented, ex post the outcomes of reforms are ambiguous, as improvements in some areas have been offset by negative results elsewhere. For increasing access to electricity and clean energy, 1990s model reforms may help, but they are neither necessary nor sufficient, nor did they focus on these objectives. In conclusion, the success or failure of policy prescriptions such as 1990s model reforms are contingent on dynamic, context-specific institutions as well as factors beyond the sector. More work is needed on integrated, flexible approaches to think and work politically in the sector, and to account for new technology and diverse sector development objectives. 2018-07-16T13:54:39Z 2018-07-16T13:54:39Z 2018-07 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/431981531320704737/Taking-stock-of-the-political-economy-of-power-sector-reforms-in-developing-countries-a-literature-review http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29991 English Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8518 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic POWER SECTOR REFORM
PUBLIC UTILITIES
POLITICAL ECONOMY
ELECTRICITY
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
EMERGING MARKET ECONOMIES
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
REGULATION
UNBUNDLING
CLEAN ENERGY
spellingShingle POWER SECTOR REFORM
PUBLIC UTILITIES
POLITICAL ECONOMY
ELECTRICITY
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
EMERGING MARKET ECONOMIES
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
REGULATION
UNBUNDLING
CLEAN ENERGY
Lee, Alan David
Usman, Zainab
Taking Stock of the Political Economy of Power Sector Reforms in Developing Countries : A Literature Review
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8518
description The power sector reform experiences of developing countries vary greatly. To help explain this from a political economy perspective, this paper reviews several dozen statistical analyses, multi-country case studies, and development practice publications. The frame of reference is the model of market-oriented reforms that became a global norm in the 1990s. Findings are organized in terms of the history, theory, motives, processes and outcomes of reforms. Market orientation emerged around the 1980s as part of a shift in economic theory and policy away from state control, and was expected to improve efficiency and investments. Reform advocates never took political economy issues into full consideration. Yet, policy makers have had sociopolitical as well as technical motives for reform, such as crisis response. International norms and competition for foreign investment and trade pulled governments to model reforms, while development partners pushed them as a condition of aid. Reform implementation has been characterized by strong tensions among different public and private interests. Concretely, 1990s model reforms were based on a logic of depoliticizing pricing and investment decisions; often placing policy makers in a conflict of interest situation. Thus, the political costs and risks of reform have often exceeded the benefits perceived by local decision makers, especially as reforms did not generally result in immediate benefits for citizens. In practice, incremental, inclusive processes may be better than quick and stealthy reforms that sidestep stakeholders' concerns. While there was limited evidence of efficacy at the time the reforms were implemented, ex post the outcomes of reforms are ambiguous, as improvements in some areas have been offset by negative results elsewhere. For increasing access to electricity and clean energy, 1990s model reforms may help, but they are neither necessary nor sufficient, nor did they focus on these objectives. In conclusion, the success or failure of policy prescriptions such as 1990s model reforms are contingent on dynamic, context-specific institutions as well as factors beyond the sector. More work is needed on integrated, flexible approaches to think and work politically in the sector, and to account for new technology and diverse sector development objectives.
format Working Paper
author Lee, Alan David
Usman, Zainab
author_facet Lee, Alan David
Usman, Zainab
author_sort Lee, Alan David
title Taking Stock of the Political Economy of Power Sector Reforms in Developing Countries : A Literature Review
title_short Taking Stock of the Political Economy of Power Sector Reforms in Developing Countries : A Literature Review
title_full Taking Stock of the Political Economy of Power Sector Reforms in Developing Countries : A Literature Review
title_fullStr Taking Stock of the Political Economy of Power Sector Reforms in Developing Countries : A Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Taking Stock of the Political Economy of Power Sector Reforms in Developing Countries : A Literature Review
title_sort taking stock of the political economy of power sector reforms in developing countries : a literature review
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2018
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/431981531320704737/Taking-stock-of-the-political-economy-of-power-sector-reforms-in-developing-countries-a-literature-review
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29991
_version_ 1764471000854953984