Comparative Study on Expert Witnesses in Court Proceedings
The Turkish Ministry of Justice has identified the existing system of expert witnesses as an obstacle to the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial services. The 2009 judicial reform strategy and the judicial reform action plan call for a com...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000333037_20110623232645 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2991 |
id |
okr-10986-2991 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-29912021-04-23T14:02:06Z Comparative Study on Expert Witnesses in Court Proceedings World Bank ABUSE ACCOUNTABILITY ACTIONS ACTS ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AFFIDAVITS ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION APPELLATE COURTS ARBITERS ARBITRATORS AUTHORITY BANKRUPTCY BANKS BATTLE BATTLES BRIBE CASE LAW CIVIL LAW CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS CIVIL LITIGATION CIVIL PROCEDURE CODES COMMON LAW COMPENSATION COMPLAINTS CONFLICT CONFLICT OF INTEREST CONFLICTS CONSTITUTIONS CONVENTION CORRUPTION COUNSEL COURT COURT HEARINGS COURT PERFORMANCE COURT PROCEEDINGS COURTS COURTS OF APPEALS CRIME CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CASES CRIMINAL COURTS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CROSS EXAMINATION DAMAGES DEFENCE DEMOCRACIES DEPOSITIONS DISCOVERY DISCRETION DISCRIMINATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION DISTRICT COURTS DUE PROCESS DUE PROCESS OF LAW EQUALITY ETHIC ETHICS EU EUROPEAN COURTS EUROPEAN UNION EVIDENCE LAW EXPERT WITNESSES FAIR TRIAL FAMILIES FEDERAL STATUTES FINGERPRINTING FRAUDS HUMAN RIGHTS INTEGRITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INTERNATIONAL TREATIES INVESTIGATION INVESTIGATIONS JUDGE JUDGES JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE JUDICIAL REFORM JUDICIAL SERVICE JUDICIAL SERVICES JUDICIAL SYSTEM JUDICIAL TRAINING JUDICIARY JURISDICTION JURISPRUDENCE JUSTICE LAW REFORM LAWS LAWS OF EVIDENCE LAWYERS LEGAL ENTITIES LEGAL ENTITY LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL MALPRACTICE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP LEGAL STANDARDS LEGAL STATUS LEGAL SYSTEMS LEGISLATION LIABILITY LIE DETECTORS LITIGATION MODALITIES MOTIONS NATIONAL LAW NATIONAL LAWS NEGLIGENCE NEGOTIATION NEGOTIATIONS OFFENSE PERJURY PLEA BARGAINING PLEADING PLEADINGS PRECEDENTS PROSECUTION PROSECUTIONS PROSECUTOR RESIDENCE ROBBERIES SANCTION SANCTIONS SELF-DETERMINATION SERVICE DELIVERY STATE COURTS STATE LAW STATE LAWS SUBSTANTIVE LAW TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TESTIMONY TRANSPARENCY TRIALS UNIVERSITIES VIOLATIONS WILL WITNESS The Turkish Ministry of Justice has identified the existing system of expert witnesses as an obstacle to the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial services. The 2009 judicial reform strategy and the judicial reform action plan call for a comparative study analyzing the experience in other countries to provide input into the policy debate in Turkey. This study provides descriptions and analyses of approaches to the use of expert opinions in civil, criminal, and administrative court proceedings in France, Germany, Italy, and the United States. It focuses on five key areas: access to the function of expert, execution of an expert opinion, the opinion and its use in evidence, remuneration, and liability. 2012-03-19T10:26:36Z 2012-03-19T10:26:36Z 2010-06-30 http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000333037_20110623232645 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2991 English CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank Economic & Sector Work :: Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment Europe and Central Asia Middle East Europe Eastern Europe Asia Turkey |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English |
topic |
ABUSE ACCOUNTABILITY ACTIONS ACTS ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AFFIDAVITS ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION APPELLATE COURTS ARBITERS ARBITRATORS AUTHORITY BANKRUPTCY BANKS BATTLE BATTLES BRIBE CASE LAW CIVIL LAW CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS CIVIL LITIGATION CIVIL PROCEDURE CODES COMMON LAW COMPENSATION COMPLAINTS CONFLICT CONFLICT OF INTEREST CONFLICTS CONSTITUTIONS CONVENTION CORRUPTION COUNSEL COURT COURT HEARINGS COURT PERFORMANCE COURT PROCEEDINGS COURTS COURTS OF APPEALS CRIME CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CASES CRIMINAL COURTS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CROSS EXAMINATION DAMAGES DEFENCE DEMOCRACIES DEPOSITIONS DISCOVERY DISCRETION DISCRIMINATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION DISTRICT COURTS DUE PROCESS DUE PROCESS OF LAW EQUALITY ETHIC ETHICS EU EUROPEAN COURTS EUROPEAN UNION EVIDENCE LAW EXPERT WITNESSES FAIR TRIAL FAMILIES FEDERAL STATUTES FINGERPRINTING FRAUDS HUMAN RIGHTS INTEGRITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INTERNATIONAL TREATIES INVESTIGATION INVESTIGATIONS JUDGE JUDGES JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE JUDICIAL REFORM JUDICIAL SERVICE JUDICIAL SERVICES JUDICIAL SYSTEM JUDICIAL TRAINING JUDICIARY JURISDICTION JURISPRUDENCE JUSTICE LAW REFORM LAWS LAWS OF EVIDENCE LAWYERS LEGAL ENTITIES LEGAL ENTITY LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL MALPRACTICE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP LEGAL STANDARDS LEGAL STATUS LEGAL SYSTEMS LEGISLATION LIABILITY LIE DETECTORS LITIGATION MODALITIES MOTIONS NATIONAL LAW NATIONAL LAWS NEGLIGENCE NEGOTIATION NEGOTIATIONS OFFENSE PERJURY PLEA BARGAINING PLEADING PLEADINGS PRECEDENTS PROSECUTION PROSECUTIONS PROSECUTOR RESIDENCE ROBBERIES SANCTION SANCTIONS SELF-DETERMINATION SERVICE DELIVERY STATE COURTS STATE LAW STATE LAWS SUBSTANTIVE LAW TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TESTIMONY TRANSPARENCY TRIALS UNIVERSITIES VIOLATIONS WILL WITNESS |
spellingShingle |
ABUSE ACCOUNTABILITY ACTIONS ACTS ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AFFIDAVITS ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION APPELLATE COURTS ARBITERS ARBITRATORS AUTHORITY BANKRUPTCY BANKS BATTLE BATTLES BRIBE CASE LAW CIVIL LAW CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS CIVIL LITIGATION CIVIL PROCEDURE CODES COMMON LAW COMPENSATION COMPLAINTS CONFLICT CONFLICT OF INTEREST CONFLICTS CONSTITUTIONS CONVENTION CORRUPTION COUNSEL COURT COURT HEARINGS COURT PERFORMANCE COURT PROCEEDINGS COURTS COURTS OF APPEALS CRIME CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CASES CRIMINAL COURTS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CROSS EXAMINATION DAMAGES DEFENCE DEMOCRACIES DEPOSITIONS DISCOVERY DISCRETION DISCRIMINATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION DISTRICT COURTS DUE PROCESS DUE PROCESS OF LAW EQUALITY ETHIC ETHICS EU EUROPEAN COURTS EUROPEAN UNION EVIDENCE LAW EXPERT WITNESSES FAIR TRIAL FAMILIES FEDERAL STATUTES FINGERPRINTING FRAUDS HUMAN RIGHTS INTEGRITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INTERNATIONAL TREATIES INVESTIGATION INVESTIGATIONS JUDGE JUDGES JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE JUDICIAL REFORM JUDICIAL SERVICE JUDICIAL SERVICES JUDICIAL SYSTEM JUDICIAL TRAINING JUDICIARY JURISDICTION JURISPRUDENCE JUSTICE LAW REFORM LAWS LAWS OF EVIDENCE LAWYERS LEGAL ENTITIES LEGAL ENTITY LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL MALPRACTICE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP LEGAL STANDARDS LEGAL STATUS LEGAL SYSTEMS LEGISLATION LIABILITY LIE DETECTORS LITIGATION MODALITIES MOTIONS NATIONAL LAW NATIONAL LAWS NEGLIGENCE NEGOTIATION NEGOTIATIONS OFFENSE PERJURY PLEA BARGAINING PLEADING PLEADINGS PRECEDENTS PROSECUTION PROSECUTIONS PROSECUTOR RESIDENCE ROBBERIES SANCTION SANCTIONS SELF-DETERMINATION SERVICE DELIVERY STATE COURTS STATE LAW STATE LAWS SUBSTANTIVE LAW TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TESTIMONY TRANSPARENCY TRIALS UNIVERSITIES VIOLATIONS WILL WITNESS World Bank Comparative Study on Expert Witnesses in Court Proceedings |
geographic_facet |
Europe and Central Asia Middle East Europe Eastern Europe Asia Turkey |
description |
The Turkish Ministry of Justice has
identified the existing system of expert witnesses as an
obstacle to the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial
services. The 2009 judicial reform strategy and the judicial
reform action plan call for a comparative study analyzing
the experience in other countries to provide input into the
policy debate in Turkey. This study provides descriptions
and analyses of approaches to the use of expert opinions in
civil, criminal, and administrative court proceedings in
France, Germany, Italy, and the United States. It focuses on
five key areas: access to the function of expert, execution
of an expert opinion, the opinion and its use in evidence,
remuneration, and liability. |
format |
Economic & Sector Work :: Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment |
author |
World Bank |
author_facet |
World Bank |
author_sort |
World Bank |
title |
Comparative Study on Expert Witnesses in Court Proceedings |
title_short |
Comparative Study on Expert Witnesses in Court Proceedings |
title_full |
Comparative Study on Expert Witnesses in Court Proceedings |
title_fullStr |
Comparative Study on Expert Witnesses in Court Proceedings |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative Study on Expert Witnesses in Court Proceedings |
title_sort |
comparative study on expert witnesses in court proceedings |
publisher |
World Bank |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000333037_20110623232645 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2991 |
_version_ |
1764386299117043712 |