Efficiency, Legitimacy and Impacts of Targeting Methods : Evidence from an Experiment in Niger

The methods to select safety net beneficiaries are the subject of frequent policy debates. This paper presents the results from a randomized experiment analyzing how efficiency, legitimacy, and short-term program effectiveness vary across widely us...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Premand, Patrick, Schnitzer, Pascale
Format: Working Paper
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/387791524060631076/Efficiency-legitimacy-and-impacts-of-targeting-methods-evidence-from-an-experiment-in-Niger
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29714
id okr-10986-29714
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-297142021-06-08T14:42:45Z Efficiency, Legitimacy and Impacts of Targeting Methods : Evidence from an Experiment in Niger Premand, Patrick Schnitzer, Pascale TARGETING CASH TRANSFERS SOCIAL PROGRAM SAFETY NETS POVERTY EFFECTIVENESS RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS PROXY-MEANS TEST FOOD SECURITY WELFARE BENCHMARKS The methods to select safety net beneficiaries are the subject of frequent policy debates. This paper presents the results from a randomized experiment analyzing how efficiency, legitimacy, and short-term program effectiveness vary across widely used targeting methods. The experiment was embedded in the roll-out of a national cash transfer program in Niger. Eligible villages were randomly assigned to have beneficiary households selected through community-based targeting, a proxy-means test, or a formula designed to identify the food-insecure. Proxy-means testing is found to outperform other methods in identifying households with lower consumption per capita. The methods perform similarly against other welfare benchmarks. Legitimacy is high across all methods, but local populations have a slight preference for formula-based approaches. Manipulation and information imperfections are found to affect community-based targeting, although triangulation across multiple selection committees mitigates the related risks. Finally, short-term program impacts on food security are largest among households selected by proxy-means testing. Overall, the differences in performance across targeting methods are small relative to the overall level of exclusion stemming from limited funding for social programs. 2018-04-20T15:33:26Z 2018-04-20T15:33:26Z 2018-04-18 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/387791524060631076/Efficiency-legitimacy-and-impacts-of-targeting-methods-evidence-from-an-experiment-in-Niger http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29714 English Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8412 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Africa Niger
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic TARGETING
CASH TRANSFERS
SOCIAL PROGRAM
SAFETY NETS
POVERTY
EFFECTIVENESS
RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS
PROXY-MEANS TEST
FOOD SECURITY
WELFARE BENCHMARKS
spellingShingle TARGETING
CASH TRANSFERS
SOCIAL PROGRAM
SAFETY NETS
POVERTY
EFFECTIVENESS
RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS
PROXY-MEANS TEST
FOOD SECURITY
WELFARE BENCHMARKS
Premand, Patrick
Schnitzer, Pascale
Efficiency, Legitimacy and Impacts of Targeting Methods : Evidence from an Experiment in Niger
geographic_facet Africa
Niger
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8412
description The methods to select safety net beneficiaries are the subject of frequent policy debates. This paper presents the results from a randomized experiment analyzing how efficiency, legitimacy, and short-term program effectiveness vary across widely used targeting methods. The experiment was embedded in the roll-out of a national cash transfer program in Niger. Eligible villages were randomly assigned to have beneficiary households selected through community-based targeting, a proxy-means test, or a formula designed to identify the food-insecure. Proxy-means testing is found to outperform other methods in identifying households with lower consumption per capita. The methods perform similarly against other welfare benchmarks. Legitimacy is high across all methods, but local populations have a slight preference for formula-based approaches. Manipulation and information imperfections are found to affect community-based targeting, although triangulation across multiple selection committees mitigates the related risks. Finally, short-term program impacts on food security are largest among households selected by proxy-means testing. Overall, the differences in performance across targeting methods are small relative to the overall level of exclusion stemming from limited funding for social programs.
format Working Paper
author Premand, Patrick
Schnitzer, Pascale
author_facet Premand, Patrick
Schnitzer, Pascale
author_sort Premand, Patrick
title Efficiency, Legitimacy and Impacts of Targeting Methods : Evidence from an Experiment in Niger
title_short Efficiency, Legitimacy and Impacts of Targeting Methods : Evidence from an Experiment in Niger
title_full Efficiency, Legitimacy and Impacts of Targeting Methods : Evidence from an Experiment in Niger
title_fullStr Efficiency, Legitimacy and Impacts of Targeting Methods : Evidence from an Experiment in Niger
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency, Legitimacy and Impacts of Targeting Methods : Evidence from an Experiment in Niger
title_sort efficiency, legitimacy and impacts of targeting methods : evidence from an experiment in niger
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2018
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/387791524060631076/Efficiency-legitimacy-and-impacts-of-targeting-methods-evidence-from-an-experiment-in-Niger
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29714
_version_ 1764470070960979968