Are Capital Flows Fickle? Increasingly? And Does the Answer Still Depend on Type?

According to conventional wisdom, capital flows are fickle. Focusing on emerging markets, we ask whether this conventional wisdom still holds in our contemporary world. Our results show that, despite recent structural and regulatory changes, much of it survives. Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eichengreen, Barry, Gupta, Poonam, Masetti, Oliver
Format: Journal Article
Published: The MIT Press 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29653
id okr-10986-29653
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-296532021-05-25T10:54:36Z Are Capital Flows Fickle? Increasingly? And Does the Answer Still Depend on Type? Eichengreen, Barry Gupta, Poonam Masetti, Oliver CAPITAL FLOWS FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DEBT EMERGING MARKET ECONOMIES According to conventional wisdom, capital flows are fickle. Focusing on emerging markets, we ask whether this conventional wisdom still holds in our contemporary world. Our results show that, despite recent structural and regulatory changes, much of it survives. Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows are more stable than non-FDI inflows. Within non-FDI inflows, portfolio debt and bank-intermediated flows remain the most volatile. Whereas FDI inflows are driven mainly by pull factors, portfolio debt and equity are driven mainly by push factors; bank-intermediated flows are driven a combination of push and pull factors. Capital outflows from emerging markets behave differently, however. FDI outflows from emerging markets have grown and become significantly more volatile. There is similarly an increase in the volatility of bank-intermediated capital outflows from emerging markets. Our findings underscore that outflows from emerging markets, both FDI and bank-related flows, have come to play a growing role and warrant greater attention from analysts and policymakers. 2018-04-10T20:46:04Z 2018-04-10T20:46:04Z 2018-02-22 Journal Article Asian Economic Papers http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29653 CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank The MIT Press Publications & Research :: Journal Article Publications & Research
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
topic CAPITAL FLOWS
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
PORTFOLIO DEBT
EMERGING MARKET ECONOMIES
spellingShingle CAPITAL FLOWS
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
PORTFOLIO DEBT
EMERGING MARKET ECONOMIES
Eichengreen, Barry
Gupta, Poonam
Masetti, Oliver
Are Capital Flows Fickle? Increasingly? And Does the Answer Still Depend on Type?
description According to conventional wisdom, capital flows are fickle. Focusing on emerging markets, we ask whether this conventional wisdom still holds in our contemporary world. Our results show that, despite recent structural and regulatory changes, much of it survives. Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows are more stable than non-FDI inflows. Within non-FDI inflows, portfolio debt and bank-intermediated flows remain the most volatile. Whereas FDI inflows are driven mainly by pull factors, portfolio debt and equity are driven mainly by push factors; bank-intermediated flows are driven a combination of push and pull factors. Capital outflows from emerging markets behave differently, however. FDI outflows from emerging markets have grown and become significantly more volatile. There is similarly an increase in the volatility of bank-intermediated capital outflows from emerging markets. Our findings underscore that outflows from emerging markets, both FDI and bank-related flows, have come to play a growing role and warrant greater attention from analysts and policymakers.
format Journal Article
author Eichengreen, Barry
Gupta, Poonam
Masetti, Oliver
author_facet Eichengreen, Barry
Gupta, Poonam
Masetti, Oliver
author_sort Eichengreen, Barry
title Are Capital Flows Fickle? Increasingly? And Does the Answer Still Depend on Type?
title_short Are Capital Flows Fickle? Increasingly? And Does the Answer Still Depend on Type?
title_full Are Capital Flows Fickle? Increasingly? And Does the Answer Still Depend on Type?
title_fullStr Are Capital Flows Fickle? Increasingly? And Does the Answer Still Depend on Type?
title_full_unstemmed Are Capital Flows Fickle? Increasingly? And Does the Answer Still Depend on Type?
title_sort are capital flows fickle? increasingly? and does the answer still depend on type?
publisher The MIT Press
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29653
_version_ 1764469896690794496