Too Small to Be Beautiful? : The Farm Size and Productivity Relationship in Bangladesh
This paper examines the agricultural productivity–farm size relationship in the context of Bangladesh. Features of Bangladesh's agriculture help overcome several limitations in testing the inverse farm size–productivity relationship in other d...
| Main Authors: | , | 
|---|---|
| Format: | Working Paper | 
| Language: | English | 
| Published: | 
        
      World Bank, Washington, DC    
    
      2018
     | 
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/925511522248076351/Too-small-to-be-beautiful-the-farm-size-and-productivity-relationship-in-Bangladesh http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29567  | 
| Summary: | This paper examines the agricultural
            productivity–farm size relationship in the context of
            Bangladesh. Features of Bangladesh's agriculture help
            overcome several limitations in testing the inverse farm
            size–productivity relationship in other developing country
            settings. A stochastic production frontier model is applied
            using data from three rounds of a household panel survey to
            estimate simultaneously the production frontier and the
            technical inefficiency functions. The “correlated random
            effects” approach is used to control for unobserved
            heterogeneous household effects. Methodologically, the
            results suggest that the stochastic production frontier
            models that ignore the inefficiency function are likely
            mis-specified, and may result in misleading conclusions on
            the farm size–productivity relationship. Empirically, the
            findings confirm that the farm size and productivity
            relationship is negative, but with the inverse relationship
            diminishing over time. Total factor productivity growth,
            driven by technical change, is found to have been robust
            across the sample. Across farm size groups, the relatively
            larger farmers experienced faster technical change, which
            helped them to catch up and narrow the productivity gap with
            the smaller farmers. | 
|---|