Agricultural Input Credit in Sub-Saharan Africa : Telling Myth from Facts
Recent evidence shows that many Sub-Saharan African farmers use modern inputs, but there is limited information on how these inputs are financed. We use recent nationally representative data from four countries to explore input financing and the role of credit therein. A number of our results contra...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Published: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29153 |
id |
okr-10986-29153 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-291532021-05-25T10:54:42Z Agricultural Input Credit in Sub-Saharan Africa : Telling Myth from Facts Adjognon, Serge G. Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. Reardon, Thomas A. FARM INPUTS CREDIT NONFARM EMPLOYMENT RURAL NONFARM EARNINGS AGRICULTURE Recent evidence shows that many Sub-Saharan African farmers use modern inputs, but there is limited information on how these inputs are financed. We use recent nationally representative data from four countries to explore input financing and the role of credit therein. A number of our results contradict “conventional wisdom” found in the literature. Our results consistently show that traditional credit use, formal or informal, is extremely low (across credit type, country, crop and farm size categories). Instead, farmers primarily finance modern input purchases with cash from nonfarm activities and crop sales. Tied output-labor arrangements (which have received little empirical treatment in the literature) appear to be the only form of credit relatively widely used for farming. 2018-01-12T20:24:01Z 2018-01-12T20:24:01Z 2017-02 Journal Article Food Policy 0306-9192 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29153 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank Elsevier Publications & Research :: Journal Article Publications & Research Africa Sub-Saharan Africa |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
topic |
FARM INPUTS CREDIT NONFARM EMPLOYMENT RURAL NONFARM EARNINGS AGRICULTURE |
spellingShingle |
FARM INPUTS CREDIT NONFARM EMPLOYMENT RURAL NONFARM EARNINGS AGRICULTURE Adjognon, Serge G. Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. Reardon, Thomas A. Agricultural Input Credit in Sub-Saharan Africa : Telling Myth from Facts |
geographic_facet |
Africa Sub-Saharan Africa |
description |
Recent evidence shows that many Sub-Saharan African farmers use modern inputs, but there is limited information on how these inputs are financed. We use recent nationally representative data from four countries to explore input financing and the role of credit therein. A number of our results contradict “conventional wisdom” found in the literature. Our results consistently show that traditional credit use, formal or informal, is extremely low (across credit type, country, crop and farm size categories). Instead, farmers primarily finance modern input purchases with cash from nonfarm activities and crop sales. Tied output-labor arrangements (which have received little empirical treatment in the literature) appear to be the only form of credit relatively widely used for farming. |
format |
Journal Article |
author |
Adjognon, Serge G. Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. Reardon, Thomas A. |
author_facet |
Adjognon, Serge G. Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. Reardon, Thomas A. |
author_sort |
Adjognon, Serge G. |
title |
Agricultural Input Credit in Sub-Saharan Africa : Telling Myth from Facts |
title_short |
Agricultural Input Credit in Sub-Saharan Africa : Telling Myth from Facts |
title_full |
Agricultural Input Credit in Sub-Saharan Africa : Telling Myth from Facts |
title_fullStr |
Agricultural Input Credit in Sub-Saharan Africa : Telling Myth from Facts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agricultural Input Credit in Sub-Saharan Africa : Telling Myth from Facts |
title_sort |
agricultural input credit in sub-saharan africa : telling myth from facts |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29153 |
_version_ |
1764468627498598400 |