Can Rigorous Impact Evaluations Improve Humanitarian Assistance?
Each year billions of US-dollars of humanitarian assistance are mobilised in response to man-made emergencies and natural disasters. Yet, rigorous evidence for how best to intervene remains scant. This dearth reflects that rigorous impact evaluations of humanitarian assistance pose major methodologi...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Published: |
Taylor and Francis
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/28630 |
id |
okr-10986-28630 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-286302021-05-25T10:54:36Z Can Rigorous Impact Evaluations Improve Humanitarian Assistance? Puri, Jyotsna Aladysheva, Anastasia Iversen, Vegard Ghorpade, Yashodhan Bruck, Tilman IMPACT EVALUATION METHODOLOGY RESEARCH DESIGN STATISTICS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE DISASTER CONFLICT VIOLENCE RECONSTRUCTION AID DEVELOPMENT Each year billions of US-dollars of humanitarian assistance are mobilised in response to man-made emergencies and natural disasters. Yet, rigorous evidence for how best to intervene remains scant. This dearth reflects that rigorous impact evaluations of humanitarian assistance pose major methodological, practical and ethical challenges. While theory-based impact evaluations can crucially inform humanitarian programming, popular methods, such as orthodox RCTs, are less suitable. Instead, factorial designs and quasi-experimental designs can be ethical and robust, answering questions about how to improve the delivery of assistance. We argue that it helps to be prepared, planning impact evaluations before the onset of emergencies. 2017-11-02T21:29:22Z 2017-11-02T21:29:22Z 2017-10-24 Journal Article Journal of Development Effectiveness 1943-9342 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/28630 CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Taylor and Francis Publications & Research :: Journal Article Publications & Research |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
topic |
IMPACT EVALUATION METHODOLOGY RESEARCH DESIGN STATISTICS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE DISASTER CONFLICT VIOLENCE RECONSTRUCTION AID DEVELOPMENT |
spellingShingle |
IMPACT EVALUATION METHODOLOGY RESEARCH DESIGN STATISTICS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE DISASTER CONFLICT VIOLENCE RECONSTRUCTION AID DEVELOPMENT Puri, Jyotsna Aladysheva, Anastasia Iversen, Vegard Ghorpade, Yashodhan Bruck, Tilman Can Rigorous Impact Evaluations Improve Humanitarian Assistance? |
description |
Each year billions of US-dollars of humanitarian assistance are mobilised in response to man-made emergencies and natural disasters. Yet, rigorous evidence for how best to intervene remains scant. This dearth reflects that rigorous impact evaluations of humanitarian assistance pose major methodological, practical and ethical challenges. While theory-based impact evaluations can crucially inform humanitarian programming, popular methods, such as orthodox RCTs, are less suitable. Instead, factorial designs and quasi-experimental designs can be ethical and robust, answering questions about how to improve the delivery of assistance. We argue that it helps to be prepared, planning impact evaluations before the onset of emergencies. |
format |
Journal Article |
author |
Puri, Jyotsna Aladysheva, Anastasia Iversen, Vegard Ghorpade, Yashodhan Bruck, Tilman |
author_facet |
Puri, Jyotsna Aladysheva, Anastasia Iversen, Vegard Ghorpade, Yashodhan Bruck, Tilman |
author_sort |
Puri, Jyotsna |
title |
Can Rigorous Impact Evaluations Improve Humanitarian Assistance? |
title_short |
Can Rigorous Impact Evaluations Improve Humanitarian Assistance? |
title_full |
Can Rigorous Impact Evaluations Improve Humanitarian Assistance? |
title_fullStr |
Can Rigorous Impact Evaluations Improve Humanitarian Assistance? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can Rigorous Impact Evaluations Improve Humanitarian Assistance? |
title_sort |
can rigorous impact evaluations improve humanitarian assistance? |
publisher |
Taylor and Francis |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/28630 |
_version_ |
1764467325500653568 |