Pakistan - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Assessment of Federal Government

This Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Assessment applies the PEFA framework and methodology to provide a snapshot of the current status of the federal government's public financial management (PFM) system. The report make...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Format: Country Financial Accountability Assessment
Language:English
Published: World Bank 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000333038_20100528015937
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2862
id okr-10986-2862
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-28622021-04-23T14:02:05Z Pakistan - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Assessment of Federal Government World Bank AUDIT BUDGET COMPREHENSIVENESS DEBT EXPENDITURE CONTROL GOVERNANCE PFM PFM REFORM POLICY-BASED BUDGETING PROCUREMENT PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PUBLIC SERVICES DELIVERY TAX ADMINISTRATION This Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Assessment applies the PEFA framework and methodology to provide a snapshot of the current status of the federal government's public financial management (PFM) system. The report makes no recommendations on policy matters it is specifically concerned with the status of the PFM system and issues relating to financial management processes. It does suggest weaknesses and strengths as well as possible priority areas to take advantage of strengths or to address higher-risk weaknesses. It makes no recommendations, however, on specific measures or action plans. The report provides a basis for these matters to be taken up subsequently, but, consistently with the PEFA framework, they should be subject to a separate discussion during the formulation of a government-led PFM reform agenda. The structure of the PFM performance report is as follows: chapter two gives background information and the country economic, fiscal, and institutional context. Chapter three provides details on each performance indicator (PI) score. Chapter four summarizes the government's ongoing PFM reform programs. Annex one gives a summary of the PEFA assessment; annex two provides sources of information, including a list of documents reviewed and officials consulted; and annex three shows key organizational elements of Pakistan's PFM structure. 2012-03-19T10:23:08Z 2012-03-19T10:23:08Z 2010-06-01 http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000333038_20100528015937 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2862 English CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank Economic & Sector Work :: Country Financial Accountability Assessment South Asia South Asia Asia Pakistan
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic AUDIT
BUDGET COMPREHENSIVENESS
DEBT
EXPENDITURE CONTROL
GOVERNANCE
PFM
PFM REFORM
POLICY-BASED BUDGETING
PROCUREMENT
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SERVICES DELIVERY
TAX ADMINISTRATION
spellingShingle AUDIT
BUDGET COMPREHENSIVENESS
DEBT
EXPENDITURE CONTROL
GOVERNANCE
PFM
PFM REFORM
POLICY-BASED BUDGETING
PROCUREMENT
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SERVICES DELIVERY
TAX ADMINISTRATION
World Bank
Pakistan - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Assessment of Federal Government
geographic_facet South Asia
South Asia
Asia
Pakistan
description This Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Assessment applies the PEFA framework and methodology to provide a snapshot of the current status of the federal government's public financial management (PFM) system. The report makes no recommendations on policy matters it is specifically concerned with the status of the PFM system and issues relating to financial management processes. It does suggest weaknesses and strengths as well as possible priority areas to take advantage of strengths or to address higher-risk weaknesses. It makes no recommendations, however, on specific measures or action plans. The report provides a basis for these matters to be taken up subsequently, but, consistently with the PEFA framework, they should be subject to a separate discussion during the formulation of a government-led PFM reform agenda. The structure of the PFM performance report is as follows: chapter two gives background information and the country economic, fiscal, and institutional context. Chapter three provides details on each performance indicator (PI) score. Chapter four summarizes the government's ongoing PFM reform programs. Annex one gives a summary of the PEFA assessment; annex two provides sources of information, including a list of documents reviewed and officials consulted; and annex three shows key organizational elements of Pakistan's PFM structure.
format Economic & Sector Work :: Country Financial Accountability Assessment
author World Bank
author_facet World Bank
author_sort World Bank
title Pakistan - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Assessment of Federal Government
title_short Pakistan - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Assessment of Federal Government
title_full Pakistan - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Assessment of Federal Government
title_fullStr Pakistan - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Assessment of Federal Government
title_full_unstemmed Pakistan - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Assessment of Federal Government
title_sort pakistan - public expenditure and financial accountability assessment of federal government
publisher World Bank
publishDate 2012
url http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000333038_20100528015937
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2862
_version_ 1764386063416033280