Explaining Agricultural Distortion Patterns : The Roles of Ideology, Inequality, Lobbying and Public Finance
In this paper, the authors examine the political economy drivers of the variation in agricultural protection, both across countries and within countries over time. The paper starts by listing the key insights provided by both the theoretical and em...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/704051468336324311/Explaining-agricultural-distortion-patterns-the-roles-of-ideology-inequality-lobbying-and-public-finance http://hdl.handle.net/10986/28159 |
Summary: | In this paper, the authors examine the
political economy drivers of the variation in agricultural
protection, both across countries and within countries over
time. The paper starts by listing the key insights provided
by both the theoretical and empirical literature on the
political economy of trade policy formulation. The authors
then set out a basic framework that allows us to put forth
various testable hypotheses on the variation and evolution
of agricultural protection. The authors find that both the
political ideology of the government and the degree of
income inequality are important determinants of agricultural
protection. Thus, both the political-support-function
approach as well as the median-voter approach can be used in
explaining the variation in agricultural protection across
countries and within countries over time. The results are
consistent with the predictions of a model that assumes that
labor is specialized and sector-specific in nature. Some
aspects of protection also seem to be consistent with
predictions of a lobbying model in that agricultural
protection is negatively related to agricultural employment
and positively related to agricultural productivity. Public
finance aspects of protection also seem to be empirically important. |
---|