Economic Growth in Egypt : Impediments and Constraints (1974-2004)
The paper focuses its analysis on the last three decades of the twentieth century. The basic assumption is that Egypt's economic performance during this period was less than satisfactory compared with the most successful examples in the far Ea...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/457861468024586289/Economic-growth-in-Egypt-impediments-and-constraints-1974-2004 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/28047 |
Summary: | The paper focuses its analysis on the
last three decades of the twentieth century. The basic
assumption is that Egypt's economic performance during
this period was less than satisfactory compared with the
most successful examples in the far East and elsewhere. The
paper also assumes that Egypt's initial conditions at
midcentury compared favorably with the winners in the
development race at the end of the century. Egypt has
achieved positive progress, no doubt, yet compared with the
higher performers in Asia, and given its favorable good
initial conditions, the record seems quite mediocre. By
mid-twentieth century, Egypt's agriculture had almost
reached its limits. Egypt, therefore, faced a new challenge:
a need to transform itself into an industrial society. This
objective was only partially achieved. The paper identifies
three interrelated factors that helped hinder Egypt's
accession to a new industrial society. The first factor is a
strong state and a weak society. An authoritarian state that
in its endeavor to preserve its prerogatives had to give up
good governance practices and limit the creative initiative
of the individuals. The second factor is a semi-rentier
economy. The availability of windfall revenues not only
reduced the pressure for change but also promoted a new
rentier mentality that undermined the emergence of an
industrial spirit. The third factor is an inadequate
education system. This system failed to provide the proper
skills and values required for the industrial society. These
factors, moreover, are interdependent and reinforce each other. |
---|