Normalizing Industrial Policy
The theoretical case for industrial policy is a strong one. The market failures that industrial policies target in markets for credit, labor, products, and knowledge have long been at the core of what development economists study. The conventional...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/524281468326684286/Normalizing-industrial-policy http://hdl.handle.net/10986/28009 |
Summary: | The theoretical case for industrial
policy is a strong one. The market failures that industrial
policies target in markets for credit, labor, products, and
knowledge have long been at the core of what development
economists study. The conventional case against industrial
policy rests on practical difficulties with its
implementation. Even though the issues could in principle be
settled by empirical evidence, the evidence to date remains
uninformative. Moreover, the conceptual difficulties
involved in statistical inference in this area are so great
that it is hard to see how statistical evidence could ever
yield a convincing verdict. A review of industrial policy in
three non-Asian settings El Salvador, Uruguay, and South
Africa highlights the extensive amount of industrial policy
that is already being carried out and frames the need for
industrial policy in the specific circumstances of
individual countries. The traditional informational and
bureaucratic constraints on the exercise of industrial
policy are not givens; they can be molded and rendered less
binding through appropriate institutional design. Three key
design attributes that industrial policy must possess are
embeddedness, carrots-and-sticks, and accountability. |
---|