Institutions for Regulatory Governance
This paper looks at the role and design of regulatory reform institutions in developing countries. These institutions are classified into four broad types: 1) regulatory reform units, commonly known in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Deve...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/955811468330978599/Better-regulation-for-growth-governance-frameworks-and-tools-for-effective-regulatory-reform-institutions-for-regulatory-governance http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27880 |
Summary: | This paper looks at the role and design
of regulatory reform institutions in developing countries.
These institutions are classified into four broad types: 1)
regulatory reform units, commonly known in Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries as
oversight bodies for regulatory reform; 2) high-level
committees for regulatory reform, established in some
countries to leverage support and take decisions at a high
political level; 3) advisory and/or advocacy bodies in
charge of proposing improvements to the regulatory system by
strengthening coordination and consultation mechanisms and
by promoting the regulatory reform agenda; and 4) Ad hoc
institutions for regulatory reform, established to launch
regulatory reform efforts and to work on a single defined
task or activity. This paper is divided into the following
sections: section one briefly reviews the theoretical debate
and literature about the role of institutions in
facilitating higher economic growth, focusing in particular
on regulatory institutions and their relevance in developing
countries; section two discusses the main features of
regulatory reform institutions at the center of government,
namely regulatory oversight bodies, high level committees,
advocacy and/ or advisory bodies and ad-hoc institutions for
regulatory reform; and section three identifies the features
of these institutions that are considered to be best
practice. Section three also identifies and discusses
lessons learned and the implications for establishing and
operating such institutions in developing country contexts. |
---|