Intergovernmental Fiscal Systems and Development Aid : Comparisons and Lessons of Experience
This paper reviews the experiences of intergovernmental fiscal systems (IGFS) to look for possible lessons for how Official Development Assistance (ODA) is delivered. Specifically, it compares IGFS and ODA in two specific respects. The first is the...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/400471468330963497/Intergovernmental-fiscal-systems-and-development-aid-some-comparisons-and-lessons-of-experience http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27501 |
Summary: | This paper reviews the experiences of
intergovernmental fiscal systems (IGFS) to look for possible
lessons for how Official Development Assistance (ODA) is
delivered. Specifically, it compares IGFS and ODA in two
specific respects. The first is the proportion of public
resources that central governments make available to
sub-national governments on a conditional basis, and how
that compares with the proportion of non-earmarked ODA given
to low income countries. The second is the role of
performance outcome in resource allocation to sub-national
governments and how that compares with the role of
performance in ODA, particularly multilateral ODA
allocation. The comparisons show that: (i) the share of
earmarked ODA is more than three times higher than that of
conditional grants in intergovernmental systems, suggesting
that donors in ODA rely more on earmarking to influence the
spending decisions of the recipient countries than their
federal governments do on conditional grants to induce
policy changes in their own sub-national governments; and
(ii) none of the OECD countries currently use outcome
measures in determining resource allocation to their
sub-national governments for a variety of good reasons, and
the recent debate as to whether multilateral ODA allocation
should be based on development outcomes seems to ignore this experience. |
---|