Who Governs Rural Russia? : Preliminary Outcomes of the 2006 Decentralization Reform
The objectives of the study are to: a) increase understanding of the effects and effectiveness of the implementation of the local government reform launched in 2006; and b) assess the impact of a World Bank-supported intervention that aimed to enha...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Report |
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
World Bank, Moscow
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/135671468107959250/Who-governs-rural-Russia-Preliminary-outcomes-of-the-2006-decentralization http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27449 |
| id |
okr-10986-27449 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
Digital Repositories |
| building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
| collection |
World Bank |
| language |
English en_US |
| topic |
ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTING ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS ADMINISTRATIVE DECENTRALIZATION ADMINISTRATIVE PERFORMANCE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES AUDITS BENEFICIARIES BUDGET MANAGEMENT BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS BUDGETING BUSINESS LICENSES CAPACITY BUILDING CITIZENS CITIZENSHIP COLLECTIVE ACTION CONSTITUENCY CONSTITUTION CORRUPTION COUNTRYSIDE DECENTRALIZATION DECENTRALIZATION REFORM DECISION-MAKING DECREE DEMOCRACY DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE DEMOCRATIC REFORMS DEMOCRATIZATION DESCRIPTION DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DISTRICT GOVERNMENT DISTRICTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELECTED OFFICIALS ENACTMENT ENTREPRENEURSHIP EQUALIZATION EQUIPMENT EXECUTION EXPENDITURE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FEDERAL LEGISLATION FEMALE FINANCES FINANCIAL AUTONOMY FINANCIAL RESOURCES FISCAL AUTONOMY FISCAL CAPACITY FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION FISCAL POLICY FORMAL PAYMENT FORMAL SYSTEM GENDER GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES GOVERNMENT GRANTS GOVERNMENT LEGISLATION GOVERNMENT LEVELS GOVERNMENT MANAGEMENT GOVERNMENT MANDATES GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE GOVERNMENT REFORM GOVERNMENT SERVICES GRANT ALLOCATION HOUSEHOLDS HOUSING HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCOME INCOME LEVELS INHABITANTS INSTRUMENT INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS INTERNATIONAL BANK INTERVENTION LAND OWNERSHIP LARGE CITIES LAWS LEGAL SUPPORT LEGISLATION LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT LIBRARIES LOCAL ADMINISTRATION LOCAL AUTONOMY LOCAL BUDGETS LOCAL BUSINESSES LOCAL CAPACITY LOCAL COUNCILS LOCAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS LOCAL LEVEL LOCAL OFFICIALS LOCAL PARTICIPATION LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT LOCAL TAX LOCALITIES MACROECONOMIC STABILITY MIGRATION MUNICIPALITIES NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS OCCUPATION PARTY AFFILIATION PENSION PERSONAL PROPERTY POLITICAL DECENTRALIZATION POLITICAL POWER PRODUCTIVITY PROPERTY TAXES PUBLIC PUBLIC MANAGEMENT PUBLIC OFFICIALS PUBLIC OPINION PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PUBLIC RESOURCES PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SUPPORT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT REGIONAL GOVERNMENT REGISTRATION SYSTEM REGISTRY OFFICE REPRESENTATIVES RESOURCE ALLOCATION RESOURCE MOBILIZATION REVENUE SOURCES REVOLUTION RURAL AREAS RURAL SETTLEMENTS SETTLEMENT SHOPS SMALL BUSINESSES SMALL TOWNS SOCIAL ASSISTANCE SOCIAL CAPITAL SOCIAL POLICY SOCIAL SOLIDARITY SUBVENTIONS TAX ADMINISTRATION TAX ASSIGNMENT TAX COLLECTION TAX PAYMENT TAX REVENUES TAXATION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TRANSACTION TRANSPARENCY TURNOVER URBAN POPULATION UTILITIES VALUATION VILLAGES VOTING WAGES YOUTH |
| spellingShingle |
ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTING ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS ADMINISTRATIVE DECENTRALIZATION ADMINISTRATIVE PERFORMANCE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES AUDITS BENEFICIARIES BUDGET MANAGEMENT BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS BUDGETING BUSINESS LICENSES CAPACITY BUILDING CITIZENS CITIZENSHIP COLLECTIVE ACTION CONSTITUENCY CONSTITUTION CORRUPTION COUNTRYSIDE DECENTRALIZATION DECENTRALIZATION REFORM DECISION-MAKING DECREE DEMOCRACY DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE DEMOCRATIC REFORMS DEMOCRATIZATION DESCRIPTION DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DISTRICT GOVERNMENT DISTRICTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELECTED OFFICIALS ENACTMENT ENTREPRENEURSHIP EQUALIZATION EQUIPMENT EXECUTION EXPENDITURE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FEDERAL LEGISLATION FEMALE FINANCES FINANCIAL AUTONOMY FINANCIAL RESOURCES FISCAL AUTONOMY FISCAL CAPACITY FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION FISCAL POLICY FORMAL PAYMENT FORMAL SYSTEM GENDER GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES GOVERNMENT GRANTS GOVERNMENT LEGISLATION GOVERNMENT LEVELS GOVERNMENT MANAGEMENT GOVERNMENT MANDATES GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE GOVERNMENT REFORM GOVERNMENT SERVICES GRANT ALLOCATION HOUSEHOLDS HOUSING HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCOME INCOME LEVELS INHABITANTS INSTRUMENT INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS INTERNATIONAL BANK INTERVENTION LAND OWNERSHIP LARGE CITIES LAWS LEGAL SUPPORT LEGISLATION LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT LIBRARIES LOCAL ADMINISTRATION LOCAL AUTONOMY LOCAL BUDGETS LOCAL BUSINESSES LOCAL CAPACITY LOCAL COUNCILS LOCAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS LOCAL LEVEL LOCAL OFFICIALS LOCAL PARTICIPATION LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT LOCAL TAX LOCALITIES MACROECONOMIC STABILITY MIGRATION MUNICIPALITIES NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS OCCUPATION PARTY AFFILIATION PENSION PERSONAL PROPERTY POLITICAL DECENTRALIZATION POLITICAL POWER PRODUCTIVITY PROPERTY TAXES PUBLIC PUBLIC MANAGEMENT PUBLIC OFFICIALS PUBLIC OPINION PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PUBLIC RESOURCES PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SUPPORT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT REGIONAL GOVERNMENT REGISTRATION SYSTEM REGISTRY OFFICE REPRESENTATIVES RESOURCE ALLOCATION RESOURCE MOBILIZATION REVENUE SOURCES REVOLUTION RURAL AREAS RURAL SETTLEMENTS SETTLEMENT SHOPS SMALL BUSINESSES SMALL TOWNS SOCIAL ASSISTANCE SOCIAL CAPITAL SOCIAL POLICY SOCIAL SOLIDARITY SUBVENTIONS TAX ADMINISTRATION TAX ASSIGNMENT TAX COLLECTION TAX PAYMENT TAX REVENUES TAXATION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TRANSACTION TRANSPARENCY TURNOVER URBAN POPULATION UTILITIES VALUATION VILLAGES VOTING WAGES YOUTH World Bank Who Governs Rural Russia? : Preliminary Outcomes of the 2006 Decentralization Reform |
| geographic_facet |
Europe and Central Asia Russian Federation |
| description |
The objectives of the study are to: a)
increase understanding of the effects and effectiveness of
the implementation of the local government reform launched
in 2006; and b) assess the impact of a World Bank-supported
intervention that aimed to enhance effectiveness of the
reforms by increasing local capacity and local
participation. In line with these objectives, the study
assessed the perceived effects and effectiveness of the
implementation of the local government reform in selected
provinces. The study also constitutes a baseline to allow
for on-going assessment of progress and to inform corrective
policy actions. The instruments and methods created during
the study may be used in future assessments of the dynamics
of local governance reform. These effects are reviewed in
section two. The study also carried out a rigorous
evaluation of the impact of an operational intervention
carried out with World Bank support in the three regions of
the study. This grant-funded project was aimed at increasing
the effectiveness of participation of rural citizens in
public life and increasing the capacity of local
administrations to operate in the new legal and fiscal
environment created by the decentralization reform. The
summary of the impact evaluation can be found in section three. |
| format |
Report |
| author |
World Bank |
| author_facet |
World Bank |
| author_sort |
World Bank |
| title |
Who Governs Rural Russia? : Preliminary Outcomes of the 2006 Decentralization Reform |
| title_short |
Who Governs Rural Russia? : Preliminary Outcomes of the 2006 Decentralization Reform |
| title_full |
Who Governs Rural Russia? : Preliminary Outcomes of the 2006 Decentralization Reform |
| title_fullStr |
Who Governs Rural Russia? : Preliminary Outcomes of the 2006 Decentralization Reform |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Who Governs Rural Russia? : Preliminary Outcomes of the 2006 Decentralization Reform |
| title_sort |
who governs rural russia? : preliminary outcomes of the 2006 decentralization reform |
| publisher |
World Bank, Moscow |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/135671468107959250/Who-governs-rural-Russia-Preliminary-outcomes-of-the-2006-decentralization http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27449 |
| _version_ |
1764464281547440128 |
| spelling |
okr-10986-274492021-04-23T14:04:41Z Who Governs Rural Russia? : Preliminary Outcomes of the 2006 Decentralization Reform World Bank ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTING ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS ADMINISTRATIVE DECENTRALIZATION ADMINISTRATIVE PERFORMANCE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES AUDITS BENEFICIARIES BUDGET MANAGEMENT BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS BUDGETING BUSINESS LICENSES CAPACITY BUILDING CITIZENS CITIZENSHIP COLLECTIVE ACTION CONSTITUENCY CONSTITUTION CORRUPTION COUNTRYSIDE DECENTRALIZATION DECENTRALIZATION REFORM DECISION-MAKING DECREE DEMOCRACY DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE DEMOCRATIC REFORMS DEMOCRATIZATION DESCRIPTION DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DISTRICT GOVERNMENT DISTRICTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELECTED OFFICIALS ENACTMENT ENTREPRENEURSHIP EQUALIZATION EQUIPMENT EXECUTION EXPENDITURE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FEDERAL LEGISLATION FEMALE FINANCES FINANCIAL AUTONOMY FINANCIAL RESOURCES FISCAL AUTONOMY FISCAL CAPACITY FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION FISCAL POLICY FORMAL PAYMENT FORMAL SYSTEM GENDER GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES GOVERNMENT GRANTS GOVERNMENT LEGISLATION GOVERNMENT LEVELS GOVERNMENT MANAGEMENT GOVERNMENT MANDATES GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE GOVERNMENT REFORM GOVERNMENT SERVICES GRANT ALLOCATION HOUSEHOLDS HOUSING HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCOME INCOME LEVELS INHABITANTS INSTRUMENT INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS INTERNATIONAL BANK INTERVENTION LAND OWNERSHIP LARGE CITIES LAWS LEGAL SUPPORT LEGISLATION LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT LIBRARIES LOCAL ADMINISTRATION LOCAL AUTONOMY LOCAL BUDGETS LOCAL BUSINESSES LOCAL CAPACITY LOCAL COUNCILS LOCAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS LOCAL LEVEL LOCAL OFFICIALS LOCAL PARTICIPATION LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT LOCAL TAX LOCALITIES MACROECONOMIC STABILITY MIGRATION MUNICIPALITIES NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS OCCUPATION PARTY AFFILIATION PENSION PERSONAL PROPERTY POLITICAL DECENTRALIZATION POLITICAL POWER PRODUCTIVITY PROPERTY TAXES PUBLIC PUBLIC MANAGEMENT PUBLIC OFFICIALS PUBLIC OPINION PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PUBLIC RESOURCES PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SUPPORT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT REGIONAL GOVERNMENT REGISTRATION SYSTEM REGISTRY OFFICE REPRESENTATIVES RESOURCE ALLOCATION RESOURCE MOBILIZATION REVENUE SOURCES REVOLUTION RURAL AREAS RURAL SETTLEMENTS SETTLEMENT SHOPS SMALL BUSINESSES SMALL TOWNS SOCIAL ASSISTANCE SOCIAL CAPITAL SOCIAL POLICY SOCIAL SOLIDARITY SUBVENTIONS TAX ADMINISTRATION TAX ASSIGNMENT TAX COLLECTION TAX PAYMENT TAX REVENUES TAXATION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TRANSACTION TRANSPARENCY TURNOVER URBAN POPULATION UTILITIES VALUATION VILLAGES VOTING WAGES YOUTH The objectives of the study are to: a) increase understanding of the effects and effectiveness of the implementation of the local government reform launched in 2006; and b) assess the impact of a World Bank-supported intervention that aimed to enhance effectiveness of the reforms by increasing local capacity and local participation. In line with these objectives, the study assessed the perceived effects and effectiveness of the implementation of the local government reform in selected provinces. The study also constitutes a baseline to allow for on-going assessment of progress and to inform corrective policy actions. The instruments and methods created during the study may be used in future assessments of the dynamics of local governance reform. These effects are reviewed in section two. The study also carried out a rigorous evaluation of the impact of an operational intervention carried out with World Bank support in the three regions of the study. This grant-funded project was aimed at increasing the effectiveness of participation of rural citizens in public life and increasing the capacity of local administrations to operate in the new legal and fiscal environment created by the decentralization reform. The summary of the impact evaluation can be found in section three. 2017-06-28T18:29:14Z 2017-06-28T18:29:14Z 2011-03 Report http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/135671468107959250/Who-governs-rural-Russia-Preliminary-outcomes-of-the-2006-decentralization http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27449 English en_US CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Moscow Economic & Sector Work :: Other Public Sector Study Economic & Sector Work Europe and Central Asia Russian Federation |