The Australian Government's Performance Framework
There has long been a keen interest from countries around the world in Australia's experience in creating an evaluation system to support evidence-based decision making and performance-based budgeting. Australia's evaluation system lasted...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/751861468212700535/The-Australian-governments-performance-framework http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27350 |
id |
okr-10986-27350 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-273502021-04-23T14:04:41Z The Australian Government's Performance Framework Mackay, Keith ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTING AUDITOR AUDITS BANKS BEST PRACTICE BROADBAND BROADBAND NETWORK BUDGET REVIEW CABINET CAPABILITIES CASH FLOWS CIVIL SOCIETY COALITION GOVERNMENT COMMODITIES COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE CONFIDENCE COPYRIGHT CORPORATE CULTURE DECISION MAKING DELIVERY OF PRODUCTS DEMOCRACY ECONOMIC COOPERATION ECONOMIC GROWTH ELECTION EVALUATION ACTIVITIES EVALUATION CAPACITY EVALUATION METHODOLOGY EVALUATION RESULTS EVALUATORS EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FLEXIBILITY GDP GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE GOVERNMENT MINISTERS GOVERNMENT POLICY GOVERNMENT SERVICE GOVERNMENT SERVICES GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT HOUSE OF REVIEW ICT INCOME INFORMATION ECONOMY INFORMATION SYSTEM INFORMATION SYSTEMS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE INNOVATION INNOVATION POLICY INSTITUTION INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS INVESTIGATION LEADERSHIP LEARNING LEGISLATION LEGISLATIVE BODIES LIVING STANDARDS LONGITUDINAL DATA LONGITUDINAL DATA SETS MATERIAL MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT MINISTER MINISTERS NECESSARY SKILLS NEGOTIATION OPERATING ENVIRONMENT OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY OUTSOURCING PARLIAMENT PARLIAMENTARIANS PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES PARLIAMENTS PENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PERFORMANCE MEASURES PERFORMANCE MONITORING POLICE POLICY FORMULATION POLICY ISSUES POLICY MAKERS POLICY MAKING POLICY OPTIONS POLITICAL PARTY PORTFOLIOS PRIME MINISTER PRIVATE SECTOR PRIVATE SECTORS PROCUREMENT PRODUCTIVITY PROFESSIONAL STAFF PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAM INTERVENTIONS PROGRAMS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC SERVANTS PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICES QUALITATIVE EVALUATION REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT REPRESENTATIVES RESULT RETENTION RISK FACTORS SERVICE DELIVERY SERVICE QUALITY STATE GOVERNMENTS STRUCTURAL REFORMS TARGETS TELEPHONE TIME FRAME TIME PERIODS TRAINING COURSE TRANSFER PAYMENTS TRANSPARENCY USER USES WEB WEB SITE WEB TRAFFIC WESTMINSTER SYSTEMS There has long been a keen interest from countries around the world in Australia's experience in creating an evaluation system to support evidence-based decision making and performance-based budgeting. Australia's evaluation system lasted from 1987 to 1997, and during that time it was used to systematically evaluate all government programs every three to five years; these evaluation findings were used heavily by officials, ministers and the cabinet in the annual budget process. The uses of these findings included the policy advice prepared by departments including the preparation of ministers' new policy proposals and departments' savings options submitted to the cabinet for its consideration. More importantly, these findings were highly influential on the cabinet's ultimate policy decisions. Finally, evaluation findings were also used widely within line departments in support of their ongoing management. This paper updates two previous World Bank papers that reviewed the Australian experience with monitoring and evaluation (M&E) and other performance-related initiatives. These papers (Mackay 1998, 2004) focused on the first two time periods addressed in this paper. 2017-06-27T17:00:08Z 2017-06-27T17:00:08Z 2011-04 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/751861468212700535/The-Australian-governments-performance-framework http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27350 English en_US ECD Working Paper Series;No. 25 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Working Paper Publications & Research East Asia and Pacific Australia |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English en_US |
topic |
ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTING AUDITOR AUDITS BANKS BEST PRACTICE BROADBAND BROADBAND NETWORK BUDGET REVIEW CABINET CAPABILITIES CASH FLOWS CIVIL SOCIETY COALITION GOVERNMENT COMMODITIES COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE CONFIDENCE COPYRIGHT CORPORATE CULTURE DECISION MAKING DELIVERY OF PRODUCTS DEMOCRACY ECONOMIC COOPERATION ECONOMIC GROWTH ELECTION EVALUATION ACTIVITIES EVALUATION CAPACITY EVALUATION METHODOLOGY EVALUATION RESULTS EVALUATORS EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FLEXIBILITY GDP GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE GOVERNMENT MINISTERS GOVERNMENT POLICY GOVERNMENT SERVICE GOVERNMENT SERVICES GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT HOUSE OF REVIEW ICT INCOME INFORMATION ECONOMY INFORMATION SYSTEM INFORMATION SYSTEMS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE INNOVATION INNOVATION POLICY INSTITUTION INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS INVESTIGATION LEADERSHIP LEARNING LEGISLATION LEGISLATIVE BODIES LIVING STANDARDS LONGITUDINAL DATA LONGITUDINAL DATA SETS MATERIAL MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT MINISTER MINISTERS NECESSARY SKILLS NEGOTIATION OPERATING ENVIRONMENT OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY OUTSOURCING PARLIAMENT PARLIAMENTARIANS PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES PARLIAMENTS PENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PERFORMANCE MEASURES PERFORMANCE MONITORING POLICE POLICY FORMULATION POLICY ISSUES POLICY MAKERS POLICY MAKING POLICY OPTIONS POLITICAL PARTY PORTFOLIOS PRIME MINISTER PRIVATE SECTOR PRIVATE SECTORS PROCUREMENT PRODUCTIVITY PROFESSIONAL STAFF PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAM INTERVENTIONS PROGRAMS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC SERVANTS PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICES QUALITATIVE EVALUATION REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT REPRESENTATIVES RESULT RETENTION RISK FACTORS SERVICE DELIVERY SERVICE QUALITY STATE GOVERNMENTS STRUCTURAL REFORMS TARGETS TELEPHONE TIME FRAME TIME PERIODS TRAINING COURSE TRANSFER PAYMENTS TRANSPARENCY USER USES WEB WEB SITE WEB TRAFFIC WESTMINSTER SYSTEMS |
spellingShingle |
ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTING AUDITOR AUDITS BANKS BEST PRACTICE BROADBAND BROADBAND NETWORK BUDGET REVIEW CABINET CAPABILITIES CASH FLOWS CIVIL SOCIETY COALITION GOVERNMENT COMMODITIES COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE CONFIDENCE COPYRIGHT CORPORATE CULTURE DECISION MAKING DELIVERY OF PRODUCTS DEMOCRACY ECONOMIC COOPERATION ECONOMIC GROWTH ELECTION EVALUATION ACTIVITIES EVALUATION CAPACITY EVALUATION METHODOLOGY EVALUATION RESULTS EVALUATORS EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FLEXIBILITY GDP GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE GOVERNMENT MINISTERS GOVERNMENT POLICY GOVERNMENT SERVICE GOVERNMENT SERVICES GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT HOUSE OF REVIEW ICT INCOME INFORMATION ECONOMY INFORMATION SYSTEM INFORMATION SYSTEMS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE INNOVATION INNOVATION POLICY INSTITUTION INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS INVESTIGATION LEADERSHIP LEARNING LEGISLATION LEGISLATIVE BODIES LIVING STANDARDS LONGITUDINAL DATA LONGITUDINAL DATA SETS MATERIAL MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT MINISTER MINISTERS NECESSARY SKILLS NEGOTIATION OPERATING ENVIRONMENT OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY OUTSOURCING PARLIAMENT PARLIAMENTARIANS PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES PARLIAMENTS PENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PERFORMANCE MEASURES PERFORMANCE MONITORING POLICE POLICY FORMULATION POLICY ISSUES POLICY MAKERS POLICY MAKING POLICY OPTIONS POLITICAL PARTY PORTFOLIOS PRIME MINISTER PRIVATE SECTOR PRIVATE SECTORS PROCUREMENT PRODUCTIVITY PROFESSIONAL STAFF PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAM INTERVENTIONS PROGRAMS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC SERVANTS PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICES QUALITATIVE EVALUATION REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT REPRESENTATIVES RESULT RETENTION RISK FACTORS SERVICE DELIVERY SERVICE QUALITY STATE GOVERNMENTS STRUCTURAL REFORMS TARGETS TELEPHONE TIME FRAME TIME PERIODS TRAINING COURSE TRANSFER PAYMENTS TRANSPARENCY USER USES WEB WEB SITE WEB TRAFFIC WESTMINSTER SYSTEMS Mackay, Keith The Australian Government's Performance Framework |
geographic_facet |
East Asia and Pacific Australia |
relation |
ECD Working Paper Series;No. 25 |
description |
There has long been a keen interest from
countries around the world in Australia's experience in
creating an evaluation system to support evidence-based
decision making and performance-based budgeting.
Australia's evaluation system lasted from 1987 to 1997,
and during that time it was used to systematically evaluate
all government programs every three to five years; these
evaluation findings were used heavily by officials,
ministers and the cabinet in the annual budget process. The
uses of these findings included the policy advice prepared
by departments including the preparation of ministers'
new policy proposals and departments' savings options
submitted to the cabinet for its consideration. More
importantly, these findings were highly influential on the
cabinet's ultimate policy decisions. Finally,
evaluation findings were also used widely within line
departments in support of their ongoing management. This
paper updates two previous World Bank papers that reviewed
the Australian experience with monitoring and evaluation
(M&E) and other performance-related initiatives. These
papers (Mackay 1998, 2004) focused on the first two time
periods addressed in this paper. |
format |
Working Paper |
author |
Mackay, Keith |
author_facet |
Mackay, Keith |
author_sort |
Mackay, Keith |
title |
The Australian Government's Performance Framework |
title_short |
The Australian Government's Performance Framework |
title_full |
The Australian Government's Performance Framework |
title_fullStr |
The Australian Government's Performance Framework |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Australian Government's Performance Framework |
title_sort |
australian government's performance framework |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/751861468212700535/The-Australian-governments-performance-framework http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27350 |
_version_ |
1764464203290116096 |