India Economic Update, June 2011
In fiscal year 2010-11, India's economy has expanded at a rate close to that observed prior to the global financial crisis. However, growth in the second half of the year slowed, and the performance of industry and investment has been particul...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/120621468258294230/India-economic-update http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27245 |
Summary: | In fiscal year 2010-11, India's
economy has expanded at a rate close to that observed prior
to the global financial crisis. However, growth in the
second half of the year slowed, and the performance of
industry and investment has been particularly disappointing.
Despite some fiscal consolidation and monetary tightening,
inflation has emerged as a serious concern because of its
effects on the poor, who are usually less able to protect
themselves against rising prices, and because of its
dampening effects on long-term investment, which is
sensitive to interest rate expectations. India's
economic growth reached 8.5 percent, helped by a strong
rebound of the agriculture sector because of good rains in
the 2010 monsoon season against the near-drought conditions
of 2009. On the external side, exports staged an
extraordinary recovery and the current account deficit
narrowed, while capital flows slowed driven by a pronounced
decline in foreign direct investment. Foreign institutional
investment remained robust, however, and external borrowing
increased to compensate partially for the decline in Foreign
Direct Investment (FDI). The rupee remained stable against
the U.S. dollar but showed a small real appreciation against
a 36-currency trade weighted index, and Reserve Bank of
India foreign reserves increased to more than $310 billion.
The central government budget deficit for FY2010-11 is
estimated to have reached 6 percent of Gross Domestic
Product (GDP), an important contraction from the widened
fiscal stance of FY2009-10. Budget implementation benefited
from higher-than-expected growth in nominal GDP and related
higher tax intake; although the tax-to-GDP ratio is still
significantly lower than in FY2007-08. The spending-to-GDP
ratio, on the other hand, was reduced by 0.7 percent of GDP
despite two supplementary demands for grants. |
---|