Philippines Quarterly Update, January 2011 : Robust Growth, Stubborn Poverty
Following a slowdown during the global financial crisis in 2009, the Philippine economy roared back in 2010, with Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rates not seen in over 30 years. On the demand side, private consumption, investment, and net expo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Manila
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/229631468294319114/Philippines-quarterly-update-robust-growth-stubborn-poverty http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27243 |
Summary: | Following a slowdown during the global
financial crisis in 2009, the Philippine economy roared back
in 2010, with Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rates not
seen in over 30 years. On the demand side, private
consumption, investment, and net exports were the main
drivers of growth. On the supply side, industry and services
propelled the economy. The external position continued to
strengthen, thanks to a consistently strong current account
and, more recently, by improvements in the capital and
financial account. Dollar remittances grew progressively
faster throughout 2010. Labor market conditions improved,
but unemployment remains high, contributing to strong OFW
deployment. Growth is expected to normalize around its
potential output in 2011 as the technical and temporary
factors that generated record growth in 2010 disappear.
Among its first actions in office, the Aquino government
carried out a comprehensive assessment of fiscal risks and
published a Fiscal Risk Statement (FRS). Experience reveals
that FRSs can yield important benefits, including lower and
better, managed risks, improved policies, and lower
financing costs. Historically, the Philippines have been
exposed to considerable fiscal risks, in part reflecting
important weaknesses in public financial management and
resulting in large fiscal costs. While fiscal risks have
abated, they still remain sizeable in the Philippines. To
improve its risk management, the government is pursuing a
program of institutional capacity building. |
---|