Alternative Approaches to Addressing the Risk of Non-Permanence in Afforestation and Reforestation Projects under the Clean Development Mechanism
The report provides quantitative and qualitative insights into the performance of different non-permanence approaches for consideration of parties. This note summarizes the results of the analysis presented in the report. Besides the existing mecha...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/560271468182329250/Final-report http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27123 |
Summary: | The report provides quantitative and
qualitative insights into the performance of different
non-permanence approaches for consideration of parties. This
note summarizes the results of the analysis presented in the
report. Besides the existing mechanism for temporary
crediting, the study analyzed a range of alternative
approaches to addressing non-permanence, including those
considered in prior deliberations of the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The
approaches address the risk of non-permanence in several
ways. Under the tonne year accounting, credits are issued
for the increments of carbon sequestered corresponding to a
defined permanence period, and their quantity depends on the
carbon stored in biomass each year of the permanence period.
However, this approach has not been implemented by any
standard. These approaches are not mutually exclusive, but
can be used in tandem with each other. |
---|