Industrial Policy, Information, and Government Capacity
Governments are resource and bandwidth constrained, and hence need to prioritize productivity-enhancing policies. To do so requires information on the nature and magnitude of market failures on the one hand, and government’s capacity to redress the...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/345771494517558184/Industrial-policy-information-and-government-capacity http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26735 |
id |
okr-10986-26735 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-267352021-06-08T14:42:46Z Industrial Policy, Information, and Government Capacity Maloney, William F. Nayyar, Gaurav INDUSTRIAL POLICY MARKET FAILURES GOVERNMENT FAILURES GOVERNANCE CAPTURE Governments are resource and bandwidth constrained, and hence need to prioritize productivity-enhancing policies. To do so requires information on the nature and magnitude of market failures on the one hand, and government’s capacity to redress them successfully on the other. The paper reviews perspectives on vertical (sectoral) and horizontal (factor markets, cluster) policies with an eye to both criteria. It first argues that the case for either cannot be made on the basis of the likelihood of successful implementation: for instance, educational and picking the winner types of policies both run the risks of capture and incompetent execution. However, the profession has been able to establish more convincing market failures for horizontal policies than for vertical policies. Most of the recent approaches to identifying failures around particular goods, the paper argues, are of limited help. Hence, for a given difficulty of execution, the former are generally to be preferred. A second critical message is that improving the quality of governance in terms of collecting information, coordination ability, and defending against capture is critical to successful implementation of productivity policies and should be central on the policy agenda. 2017-05-23T22:28:55Z 2017-05-23T22:28:55Z 2017-05 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/345771494517558184/Industrial-policy-information-and-government-capacity http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26735 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8056 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English en_US |
topic |
INDUSTRIAL POLICY MARKET FAILURES GOVERNMENT FAILURES GOVERNANCE CAPTURE |
spellingShingle |
INDUSTRIAL POLICY MARKET FAILURES GOVERNMENT FAILURES GOVERNANCE CAPTURE Maloney, William F. Nayyar, Gaurav Industrial Policy, Information, and Government Capacity |
relation |
Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8056 |
description |
Governments are resource and bandwidth
constrained, and hence need to prioritize
productivity-enhancing policies. To do so requires
information on the nature and magnitude of market failures
on the one hand, and government’s capacity to redress them
successfully on the other. The paper reviews perspectives on
vertical (sectoral) and horizontal (factor markets, cluster)
policies with an eye to both criteria. It first argues that
the case for either cannot be made on the basis of the
likelihood of successful implementation: for instance,
educational and picking the winner types of policies both
run the risks of capture and incompetent execution. However,
the profession has been able to establish more convincing
market failures for horizontal policies than for vertical
policies. Most of the recent approaches to identifying
failures around particular goods, the paper argues, are of
limited help. Hence, for a given difficulty of execution,
the former are generally to be preferred. A second critical
message is that improving the quality of governance in terms
of collecting information, coordination ability, and
defending against capture is critical to successful
implementation of productivity policies and should be
central on the policy agenda. |
format |
Working Paper |
author |
Maloney, William F. Nayyar, Gaurav |
author_facet |
Maloney, William F. Nayyar, Gaurav |
author_sort |
Maloney, William F. |
title |
Industrial Policy, Information, and Government Capacity |
title_short |
Industrial Policy, Information, and Government Capacity |
title_full |
Industrial Policy, Information, and Government Capacity |
title_fullStr |
Industrial Policy, Information, and Government Capacity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Industrial Policy, Information, and Government Capacity |
title_sort |
industrial policy, information, and government capacity |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/345771494517558184/Industrial-policy-information-and-government-capacity http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26735 |
_version_ |
1764462738159960064 |