Comparison of the Monitoring and Evaluation Systems of the World Bank and the Global Fund
The purpose of this study is to document the approaches of the World Bank and the Global Fund to monitoring and evaluation (M&E), and to systematically and objectively compare the principles and objectives of the M&E systems and how these s...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Working Paper |
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/876011468171577984/Comparison-of-the-monitoring-and-evaluation-systems-of-the-World-Bank-and-the-Global-Fund http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26678 |
| id |
okr-10986-26678 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
Digital Repositories |
| building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
| collection |
World Bank |
| language |
English en_US |
| topic |
ACCOUNTABILITY ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME ACTION PLAN ADOLESCENT REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AGED AUDITS AUTOMATION BABIES BEHAVIOR CHANGE BUSINESS MODEL CAPACITY BUILDING CENTER FOR HEALTH CHILD MORTALITY CONDOM CONTROL GROUPS COORDINATION MECHANISM DECISION MAKING DECLINES IN MORTALITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DISCRIMINATION DISEASES DRUGS EPIDEMIC EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FINANCIAL COMMITMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT GLOBAL HEALTH GOOD GOVERNANCE HEALTH POLICY HEALTH REFORM HEALTH RESEARCH HEALTH SECTOR HEALTH SECTOR REFORM HEALTH SYSTEM HEALTH WORKERS HIV HIV INFECTION HUMAN CAPACITY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS HUMAN RESOURCES HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ICR ILL HEALTH IMMUNODEFICIENCY IMPACT EVALUATION IMPLEMENTING AGENCY INFORMATION GAPS INFORMATION SYSTEM INSTITUTION INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES INTERVENTION KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS KNOWLEDGE BASE LEARNING LEGAL STATUS MALARIA MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS MINISTRY OF HEALTH MONITORING TOOLS MORBIDITY MORTALITY MORTALITY RATE MOTHER MOTHER-TO-CHILD MOTHER-TO-CHILD TRANSMISSION MULTILATERAL ORGANIZATIONS NATIONAL CAPACITY NATIONAL EFFORTS NATIONAL POLICY NATIONAL STRATEGIES NATIONAL STRATEGY NEGOTIATION NGO NUMBER OF ADULTS NUMBER OF PEOPLE NUMBER OF WOMEN NUTRITION ORPHANS OUTCOME INDICATORS OUTPUT INDICATORS OUTREACH ACTIVITIES PATIENTS PEER EDUCATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PERFORMANCE MEASURES PERFORMANCE MONITORING PILOT PROJECTS POLICY DIALOGUE POLICY PROCESS PREGNANT WOMEN PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS PROGRESS PROJECT EVALUATION PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROJECT MONITORING PROJECT OBJECTIVES PROMOTING GENDER EQUITY PUBLIC AFFAIRS PUBLIC HEALTH QUALITY ASSURANCE RESOURCE ALLOCATION RESOURCE MOBILIZATION RESULT SELF-ASSESSMENT SERVICE DELIVERY SERVICE DELIVERY POINTS SEX SEX WORKERS SEXUAL CONTACT SEXUAL INTERCOURSE SEXUAL PARTNER SEXUALLY ACTIVE SITES SOCIAL WELFARE STANDARDIZATION SUPERVISION SUSTAINABLE GROWTH TARGETS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT TECHNICAL SUPPORT TELEPHONE TIME PERIOD TRANSMISSION TRANSPARENCY TUBERCULOSIS USE OF CONDOMS USE OF RESOURCES USES VERIFICATION VIRUS VOLUNTARY TESTING WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION YOUNG ADULTS |
| spellingShingle |
ACCOUNTABILITY ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME ACTION PLAN ADOLESCENT REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AGED AUDITS AUTOMATION BABIES BEHAVIOR CHANGE BUSINESS MODEL CAPACITY BUILDING CENTER FOR HEALTH CHILD MORTALITY CONDOM CONTROL GROUPS COORDINATION MECHANISM DECISION MAKING DECLINES IN MORTALITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DISCRIMINATION DISEASES DRUGS EPIDEMIC EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FINANCIAL COMMITMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT GLOBAL HEALTH GOOD GOVERNANCE HEALTH POLICY HEALTH REFORM HEALTH RESEARCH HEALTH SECTOR HEALTH SECTOR REFORM HEALTH SYSTEM HEALTH WORKERS HIV HIV INFECTION HUMAN CAPACITY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS HUMAN RESOURCES HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ICR ILL HEALTH IMMUNODEFICIENCY IMPACT EVALUATION IMPLEMENTING AGENCY INFORMATION GAPS INFORMATION SYSTEM INSTITUTION INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES INTERVENTION KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS KNOWLEDGE BASE LEARNING LEGAL STATUS MALARIA MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS MINISTRY OF HEALTH MONITORING TOOLS MORBIDITY MORTALITY MORTALITY RATE MOTHER MOTHER-TO-CHILD MOTHER-TO-CHILD TRANSMISSION MULTILATERAL ORGANIZATIONS NATIONAL CAPACITY NATIONAL EFFORTS NATIONAL POLICY NATIONAL STRATEGIES NATIONAL STRATEGY NEGOTIATION NGO NUMBER OF ADULTS NUMBER OF PEOPLE NUMBER OF WOMEN NUTRITION ORPHANS OUTCOME INDICATORS OUTPUT INDICATORS OUTREACH ACTIVITIES PATIENTS PEER EDUCATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PERFORMANCE MEASURES PERFORMANCE MONITORING PILOT PROJECTS POLICY DIALOGUE POLICY PROCESS PREGNANT WOMEN PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS PROGRESS PROJECT EVALUATION PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROJECT MONITORING PROJECT OBJECTIVES PROMOTING GENDER EQUITY PUBLIC AFFAIRS PUBLIC HEALTH QUALITY ASSURANCE RESOURCE ALLOCATION RESOURCE MOBILIZATION RESULT SELF-ASSESSMENT SERVICE DELIVERY SERVICE DELIVERY POINTS SEX SEX WORKERS SEXUAL CONTACT SEXUAL INTERCOURSE SEXUAL PARTNER SEXUALLY ACTIVE SITES SOCIAL WELFARE STANDARDIZATION SUPERVISION SUSTAINABLE GROWTH TARGETS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT TECHNICAL SUPPORT TELEPHONE TIME PERIOD TRANSMISSION TRANSPARENCY TUBERCULOSIS USE OF CONDOMS USE OF RESOURCES USES VERIFICATION VIRUS VOLUNTARY TESTING WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION YOUNG ADULTS Cashin, Cheryl Comparison of the Monitoring and Evaluation Systems of the World Bank and the Global Fund |
| relation |
IEG Working Paper;2012/1 |
| description |
The purpose of this study is to document
the approaches of the World Bank and the Global Fund to
monitoring and evaluation (M&E), and to systematically
and objectively compare the principles and objectives of the
M&E systems and how these systems are implemented and
used in practice at the country level. The report also
discusses the relationship of the M&E systems to the two
different business models of the World Bank and the Global
Fund. The first goal is to identify whether and how the
conclusions that emerge from their M&E systems on the
effectiveness of their respective global health activities
can be compared. The second goal is to contribute to the
ongoing process of identifying good practices for developing
M&E policies for global health programs, setting up
M&E frameworks, planning and programming evaluations,
and using M&E results more effectively to manage
programs and strengthen the health policy process in partner
countries. The report is organized as follows. Section two
summarizes the World Bank's stated policies and
approach to monitoring and evaluation. Each element of
standard M&E systems framework; system of indicators and
performance measurement; data collection and analysis;
feedback and use of monitoring findings; and evaluation is
described for the World Bank's approach in this
section. Section three summarizes the Global Fund's
stated M&E approach and policies according to the same
structure. Section four compares the application of the
approach to M&E of the two agencies in Burkina Faso,
Lesotho and Russia. Section five provides a summary of the
comparison between the two approaches to M&E. Section
six identifies conclusions and lessons learned. |
| format |
Working Paper |
| author |
Cashin, Cheryl |
| author_facet |
Cashin, Cheryl |
| author_sort |
Cashin, Cheryl |
| title |
Comparison of the Monitoring and Evaluation Systems of the World Bank and the Global Fund |
| title_short |
Comparison of the Monitoring and Evaluation Systems of the World Bank and the Global Fund |
| title_full |
Comparison of the Monitoring and Evaluation Systems of the World Bank and the Global Fund |
| title_fullStr |
Comparison of the Monitoring and Evaluation Systems of the World Bank and the Global Fund |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the Monitoring and Evaluation Systems of the World Bank and the Global Fund |
| title_sort |
comparison of the monitoring and evaluation systems of the world bank and the global fund |
| publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/876011468171577984/Comparison-of-the-monitoring-and-evaluation-systems-of-the-World-Bank-and-the-Global-Fund http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26678 |
| _version_ |
1764462444661440512 |
| spelling |
okr-10986-266782021-04-23T14:04:37Z Comparison of the Monitoring and Evaluation Systems of the World Bank and the Global Fund Cashin, Cheryl ACCOUNTABILITY ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME ACTION PLAN ADOLESCENT REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AGED AUDITS AUTOMATION BABIES BEHAVIOR CHANGE BUSINESS MODEL CAPACITY BUILDING CENTER FOR HEALTH CHILD MORTALITY CONDOM CONTROL GROUPS COORDINATION MECHANISM DECISION MAKING DECLINES IN MORTALITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DISCRIMINATION DISEASES DRUGS E-MAIL EPIDEMIC EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FINANCIAL COMMITMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT GLOBAL HEALTH GOOD GOVERNANCE HEALTH POLICY HEALTH REFORM HEALTH RESEARCH HEALTH SECTOR HEALTH SECTOR REFORM HEALTH SYSTEM HEALTH WORKERS HIV HIV INFECTION HUMAN CAPACITY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS HUMAN RESOURCES HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ICR ILL HEALTH IMMUNODEFICIENCY IMPACT EVALUATION IMPLEMENTING AGENCY INFORMATION GAPS INFORMATION SYSTEM INSTITUTION INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES INTERVENTION KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS KNOWLEDGE BASE LEARNING LEGAL STATUS MALARIA MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS MINISTRY OF HEALTH MONITORING TOOLS MORBIDITY MORTALITY MORTALITY RATE MOTHER MOTHER-TO-CHILD MOTHER-TO-CHILD TRANSMISSION MULTILATERAL ORGANIZATIONS NATIONAL CAPACITY NATIONAL EFFORTS NATIONAL POLICY NATIONAL STRATEGIES NATIONAL STRATEGY NEGOTIATION NGO NUMBER OF ADULTS NUMBER OF PEOPLE NUMBER OF WOMEN NUTRITION ORPHANS OUTCOME INDICATORS OUTPUT INDICATORS OUTREACH ACTIVITIES PATIENTS PEER EDUCATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PERFORMANCE MEASURES PERFORMANCE MONITORING PILOT PROJECTS POLICY DIALOGUE POLICY PROCESS PREGNANT WOMEN PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS PROGRESS PROJECT EVALUATION PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROJECT MONITORING PROJECT OBJECTIVES PROMOTING GENDER EQUITY PUBLIC AFFAIRS PUBLIC HEALTH QUALITY ASSURANCE RESOURCE ALLOCATION RESOURCE MOBILIZATION RESULT SELF-ASSESSMENT SERVICE DELIVERY SERVICE DELIVERY POINTS SEX SEX WORKERS SEXUAL CONTACT SEXUAL INTERCOURSE SEXUAL PARTNER SEXUALLY ACTIVE SITES SOCIAL WELFARE STANDARDIZATION SUPERVISION SUSTAINABLE GROWTH TARGETS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT TECHNICAL SUPPORT TELEPHONE TIME PERIOD TRANSMISSION TRANSPARENCY TUBERCULOSIS USE OF CONDOMS USE OF RESOURCES USES VERIFICATION VIRUS VOLUNTARY TESTING WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION YOUNG ADULTS The purpose of this study is to document the approaches of the World Bank and the Global Fund to monitoring and evaluation (M&E), and to systematically and objectively compare the principles and objectives of the M&E systems and how these systems are implemented and used in practice at the country level. The report also discusses the relationship of the M&E systems to the two different business models of the World Bank and the Global Fund. The first goal is to identify whether and how the conclusions that emerge from their M&E systems on the effectiveness of their respective global health activities can be compared. The second goal is to contribute to the ongoing process of identifying good practices for developing M&E policies for global health programs, setting up M&E frameworks, planning and programming evaluations, and using M&E results more effectively to manage programs and strengthen the health policy process in partner countries. The report is organized as follows. Section two summarizes the World Bank's stated policies and approach to monitoring and evaluation. Each element of standard M&E systems framework; system of indicators and performance measurement; data collection and analysis; feedback and use of monitoring findings; and evaluation is described for the World Bank's approach in this section. Section three summarizes the Global Fund's stated M&E approach and policies according to the same structure. Section four compares the application of the approach to M&E of the two agencies in Burkina Faso, Lesotho and Russia. Section five provides a summary of the comparison between the two approaches to M&E. Section six identifies conclusions and lessons learned. 2017-05-22T15:11:30Z 2017-05-22T15:11:30Z 2012 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/876011468171577984/Comparison-of-the-monitoring-and-evaluation-systems-of-the-World-Bank-and-the-Global-Fund 978-1-60244-216-0 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26678 English en_US IEG Working Paper;2012/1 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Working Paper |