Evaluation of New Fishery Performance Indicators : A Case Study of the Blue Swimming Crab Fisheries in Indonesia and Philippines
To further develop and finalize the Fishery Performance Indicators (FPIs) for scaling up to the Bank's entire fisheries portfolio, a number of specific pilots and case studies have been conducted. This report provides an overview of the FPIs,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/915781468336646778/Evaluation-of-new-Fishery-Performance-Indicators-FPIs-a-case-study-of-the-blue-swimming-crab-fisheries-in-Indonesia-and-Philippines http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26550 |
Summary: | To further develop and finalize the
Fishery Performance Indicators (FPIs) for scaling up to the
Bank's entire fisheries portfolio, a number of specific
pilots and case studies have been conducted. This report
provides an overview of the FPIs, and a summary of two case
studies in its application, the blue swimming crab (BSC)
fisheries in Indonesia and the Philippines. A comparative
analysis with an Icelandic lobster fishery is conducted as a
benchmark, as the Icelandic lobster fishery is also export
oriented and has been recognized as a well-managed fishery.
The study is organized as follows: chapter two provides a
brief introduction of FPIs and the blue swimming fisheries
in Indonesia and the Philippines. Chapter three presents the
results for FPIs that measure the success
('outputs') in achieving the 'triple bottom
line' of environmental, social, and economic
sustainability and provides a critical evaluation of
strengths, weaknesses, and omissions of the current FPIs
design. Chapter four presents the results for FPIs that
measure factors ('inputs') that enable (or
undermine) the likelihood that the triple bottom line will
be achieved and provides a critical evaluation of strengths,
weaknesses, and omissions of the current FPIs design chapter
five summarizes the results and draws conclusions about the
applicability of FPIs and next steps. Five appendices
provide supplementary information. Appendix A provides
detailed explanation of the rationale and measurement for
each indicator. Appendix B lists additional suggested
indicators based on the case studies. Appendix C lists the
participants who have attended the workshops in London and
Hawaii. Appendixes D and E illustrate the FPIs' output
and input results for the studied fisheries, respectively. |
---|