The Microfinance Business Model : Enduring Subsidy and Modest Profit
Recent evidence suggests only modest social and economic impacts of microfinance. Favorable cost-benefit ratios then depend on low costs. This paper uses proprietary data on 1,335 microfinance institutions between 2005 and 2009, jointly serving 80....
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Working Paper |
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/08/26672277/microfinance-business-model-enduring-subsidy-modest-profit http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24867 |
| Summary: | Recent evidence suggests only modest
social and economic impacts of microfinance. Favorable
cost-benefit ratios then depend on low costs. This paper
uses proprietary data on 1,335 microfinance institutions
between 2005 and 2009, jointly serving 80.1 million
borrowers, to calculate the costs of microfinance and other
elements of the microfinance business model. It calculates
that on average, subsidies amounted to $132 per borrower,
but the distribution is highly skewed. The median
microfinance institution used subsidies at a rate of just
$26 per borrower, and no subsidy was used by the institution
at the 25th percentile. These data suggest that, for some
institutions, even modest benefits could yield impressive
cost-benefit ratios. At the same time, the data show that
the subsidy is large for some institutions. Counter to
expectations, the most heavily-subsidized group of borrowers
is customers of the most commercialized institutions, with
an average of $275 per borrower and a median of $93.
Customers of nongovernmental organizations, which focus on
the poorest customers and women, receive a far smaller
subsidy: the median microfinance nongovernmental
organization used subsidy at a rate of $23 per borrower, and
subsidy for the nongovernmental organization at the 25th
percentile was just $3 per borrower. |
|---|