Romania Toward a Low Carbon and Climate Resilient Economy : Marginal Abatement Cost Curve Analysis
The Marginal Abatement Cost Curves (MACC) analysis in the Romania Green Growth study presents a cross-sectoral outlook of the benefits and costs of the green technologies and abatement measures recommended in the sectoral modeling and analysis for...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Brief | 
| Language: | English en_US  | 
| Published: | 
        
      World Bank, Washington, DC    
    
      2016
     | 
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/03/26049048/romania-toward-low-carbon-climate-resilient-economy-marginal-abatement-cost-curve-analysis http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24065  | 
| Summary: | The Marginal Abatement Cost Curves
            (MACC) analysis in the Romania Green Growth study presents a
            cross-sectoral outlook of the benefits and costs of the
            green technologies and abatement measures recommended in the
            sectoral modeling and analysis for the time period
            2015-2050. MACC are a commonly used tool in evaluating
            emissions reduction technologies and a most efficient
            communication instrument for discussions of the abatement
            policies. Romania’s MACC is a combination of sectoral
            curves, each of which was built using the most appropriate
            approach for each sector. Global and local data sources were
            use in the MACC analysis. The findings are as follows: (i)
            sector analysis conducted for the Romania Green Growth
            Assessment resulted in a selection of a list of measures
            that constitute a green package in each sector of energy
            efficiency, powersupply, forestry, agriculture,and
            transport; (ii) a review by sector shows that energy
            efficiency measures are most beneficial, they have high
            abatement potential and mostly negative cost, while
            electricity supply interventions produce most of the
            abatement; (iii) agriculture and forestry measures are cost
            efficient and (iv) in transport, attacking emissions and
            generating local co-benefits justifies the high cost of the
            interventions and motivates support for improved transport
            policies. The conclusions and recommendations are as
            follows: (a) The MACC work derives from the analysis and
            modeling of all the relevant sectors in the Assessment; (b)
            when the MACC data from all sectors is modeled in one chart,
            it creates a clear and simple picture that compares green
            measures by costs and benefits across sectors;  and (c) the
            Romania MACC can increase the quality of decisions regarding
            prioritizing and scheduling the proposed abatement measures. | 
|---|