Qualitative Research to Enhance the Evaluation of Results-Based Financing Programmes : The Promise and the Reality
This Discussion Paper presents the approach, findings, and recommendations from a desk review of the qualitative research conducted within Results-Based Financing programmes (RBF) under the Health Results Innovations Trust Fund (HRITF). The review...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/03/26012500/qualitative-research-enhance-evaluation-results-based-financing-programmes-promise-reality http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24038 |
id |
okr-10986-24038 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-240382021-05-25T10:54:44Z Qualitative Research to Enhance the Evaluation of Results-Based Financing Programmes : The Promise and the Reality Cataldo, Fabian Kielmann, Karina SKILLS WASTE GOOD PRACTICE DISCUSSION COMMUNICATION PROTOCOLS COMMUNITIES RISKS FOCUS GROUP WORKFORCE AWARENESS INFORMED CONSENT PERSONALITY UNITS OF ANALYSIS FEEDBACK TIME KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER PSYCHOLOGY TRAITS DATA COLLECTION COMMUNITY HEALTH CITATION INFORMATION HEALTH RESEARCH HEALTH CARE CONTENTS ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH CAPACITY EFFECTS HEALTH RESEARCHER HOLISTIC APPROACH THINKING LEADING CULTURAL NORMS RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS QUALITATIVE DATA COLLABORATION KNOWLEDGE COMMUNITY MEMBERS ARCHIVES COMPLEXITY DATA TECHNIQUES SPACE METHODOLOGIES IDENTITY DOCUMENT PARTNERSHIPS PATIENT PATIENTS RESEARCH METHODOLOGY INTERVENTION PROBABILITY RELATIONSHIPS SITE EXPERTS OBSERVATION CASES DOCUMENTS COMPETENCIES LEARNING INDICATORS RESEARCH STANDARDS PROCESS DATA ANALYSIS METHODS STUDY INTERVIEW PRACTICE INSIGHTS TESTING PUBLISHING METHODS USERS HIERARCHIES INTERVIEWS WORKERS RESEARCH POLICY FATIGUE SCIENCE VALIDITY DESCRIPTION BOUNDARIES HEALTH OUTCOMES QUANTITATIVE DATA PROCESSES HYGIENE RESEARCHERS PROTOCOLS SOCIAL SCIENCE DECISION-MAKING SAMPLES LOGIC COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT NUTRITION CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK WORKSHOPS ASSUMPTIONS QUALITY CONTROL RESEARCH PROJECTS RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES CASE INTERNET CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING THEORY RAW’ DATA EVALUATION HUMAN RESOURCES SAMPLING ISOLATION INTEGRATION INNOVATION SITES PROTOCOL ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE COMMUNICATION STRATEGY EPIDEMIOLOGY CHILD HEALTH SERVICES CONCEPTS VARIETY DATABASE METHODOLOGY QUESTIONNAIRES RESEARCH STRATEGIES HEALTH INTERVENTIONS RESEARCH TECHNIQUES HEALTH SERVICES IMPLEMENTATION ENTRY INNOVATIONS NURSING STORAGE This Discussion Paper presents the approach, findings, and recommendations from a desk review of the qualitative research conducted within Results-Based Financing programmes (RBF) under the Health Results Innovations Trust Fund (HRITF). The review included 17 studies conducted in Benin, Burundi, Cameroon, DRC, Ethiopia, Haiti, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria, Rwanda, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. The studies reveal a body of high quality work that is consistent with the conceptual framework of RBF schemes, supported by political will, resources, and research capacity. Strengthening the added value of qualitative inquiry in on-going and future qualitative studies may be enabled by small shifts in thinking and practice, in line with a qualitative research paradigm. First, in order to better ground research in an existing country and system specific context, some interrogation of constructs and posited relationships in the existing conceptual framework for intervention/evaluation may be required. Second, to enable more in-depth and richer data that documents working practices and relations under RBF schemes, training of local researchers should place stronger emphasis on entry to the field, gaining trust, building rapport, and sustaining a dialogue with key informants. Third, smaller, more intensive and focused studies targeting fewer sites and smaller samples - but addressing a wider range of methods and informants within the health system - are likely to yield richer data that can support the understanding of how health workers and managers are responding to schemes, and what impact schemes have on service volumes and outputs. 2016-04-11T18:37:29Z 2016-04-11T18:37:29Z 2016-02 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/03/26012500/qualitative-research-enhance-evaluation-results-based-financing-programmes-promise-reality http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24038 English en_US Health, Nutrition and Population Discussion Paper; CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Working Paper Africa Europe and Central Asia Latin America & Caribbean |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English en_US |
topic |
SKILLS WASTE GOOD PRACTICE DISCUSSION COMMUNICATION PROTOCOLS COMMUNITIES RISKS FOCUS GROUP WORKFORCE AWARENESS INFORMED CONSENT PERSONALITY UNITS OF ANALYSIS FEEDBACK TIME KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER PSYCHOLOGY TRAITS DATA COLLECTION COMMUNITY HEALTH CITATION INFORMATION HEALTH RESEARCH HEALTH CARE CONTENTS ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH CAPACITY EFFECTS HEALTH RESEARCHER HOLISTIC APPROACH THINKING LEADING CULTURAL NORMS RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS QUALITATIVE DATA COLLABORATION KNOWLEDGE COMMUNITY MEMBERS ARCHIVES COMPLEXITY DATA TECHNIQUES SPACE METHODOLOGIES IDENTITY DOCUMENT PARTNERSHIPS PATIENT PATIENTS RESEARCH METHODOLOGY INTERVENTION PROBABILITY RELATIONSHIPS SITE EXPERTS OBSERVATION CASES DOCUMENTS COMPETENCIES LEARNING INDICATORS RESEARCH STANDARDS PROCESS DATA ANALYSIS METHODS STUDY INTERVIEW PRACTICE INSIGHTS TESTING PUBLISHING METHODS USERS HIERARCHIES INTERVIEWS WORKERS RESEARCH POLICY FATIGUE SCIENCE VALIDITY DESCRIPTION BOUNDARIES HEALTH OUTCOMES QUANTITATIVE DATA PROCESSES HYGIENE RESEARCHERS PROTOCOLS SOCIAL SCIENCE DECISION-MAKING SAMPLES LOGIC COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT NUTRITION CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK WORKSHOPS ASSUMPTIONS QUALITY CONTROL RESEARCH PROJECTS RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES CASE INTERNET CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING THEORY RAW’ DATA EVALUATION HUMAN RESOURCES SAMPLING ISOLATION INTEGRATION INNOVATION SITES PROTOCOL ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE COMMUNICATION STRATEGY EPIDEMIOLOGY CHILD HEALTH SERVICES CONCEPTS VARIETY DATABASE METHODOLOGY QUESTIONNAIRES RESEARCH STRATEGIES HEALTH INTERVENTIONS RESEARCH TECHNIQUES HEALTH SERVICES IMPLEMENTATION ENTRY INNOVATIONS NURSING STORAGE |
spellingShingle |
SKILLS WASTE GOOD PRACTICE DISCUSSION COMMUNICATION PROTOCOLS COMMUNITIES RISKS FOCUS GROUP WORKFORCE AWARENESS INFORMED CONSENT PERSONALITY UNITS OF ANALYSIS FEEDBACK TIME KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER PSYCHOLOGY TRAITS DATA COLLECTION COMMUNITY HEALTH CITATION INFORMATION HEALTH RESEARCH HEALTH CARE CONTENTS ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH CAPACITY EFFECTS HEALTH RESEARCHER HOLISTIC APPROACH THINKING LEADING CULTURAL NORMS RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS QUALITATIVE DATA COLLABORATION KNOWLEDGE COMMUNITY MEMBERS ARCHIVES COMPLEXITY DATA TECHNIQUES SPACE METHODOLOGIES IDENTITY DOCUMENT PARTNERSHIPS PATIENT PATIENTS RESEARCH METHODOLOGY INTERVENTION PROBABILITY RELATIONSHIPS SITE EXPERTS OBSERVATION CASES DOCUMENTS COMPETENCIES LEARNING INDICATORS RESEARCH STANDARDS PROCESS DATA ANALYSIS METHODS STUDY INTERVIEW PRACTICE INSIGHTS TESTING PUBLISHING METHODS USERS HIERARCHIES INTERVIEWS WORKERS RESEARCH POLICY FATIGUE SCIENCE VALIDITY DESCRIPTION BOUNDARIES HEALTH OUTCOMES QUANTITATIVE DATA PROCESSES HYGIENE RESEARCHERS PROTOCOLS SOCIAL SCIENCE DECISION-MAKING SAMPLES LOGIC COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT NUTRITION CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK WORKSHOPS ASSUMPTIONS QUALITY CONTROL RESEARCH PROJECTS RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES CASE INTERNET CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING THEORY RAW’ DATA EVALUATION HUMAN RESOURCES SAMPLING ISOLATION INTEGRATION INNOVATION SITES PROTOCOL ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE COMMUNICATION STRATEGY EPIDEMIOLOGY CHILD HEALTH SERVICES CONCEPTS VARIETY DATABASE METHODOLOGY QUESTIONNAIRES RESEARCH STRATEGIES HEALTH INTERVENTIONS RESEARCH TECHNIQUES HEALTH SERVICES IMPLEMENTATION ENTRY INNOVATIONS NURSING STORAGE Cataldo, Fabian Kielmann, Karina Qualitative Research to Enhance the Evaluation of Results-Based Financing Programmes : The Promise and the Reality |
geographic_facet |
Africa Europe and Central Asia Latin America & Caribbean |
relation |
Health, Nutrition and Population Discussion Paper; |
description |
This Discussion Paper presents the
approach, findings, and recommendations from a desk review
of the qualitative research conducted within Results-Based
Financing programmes (RBF) under the Health Results
Innovations Trust Fund (HRITF). The review included 17
studies conducted in Benin, Burundi, Cameroon, DRC,
Ethiopia, Haiti, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria, Rwanda,
Tajikistan, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. The studies
reveal a body of high quality work that is consistent with
the conceptual framework of RBF schemes, supported by
political will, resources, and research capacity.
Strengthening the added value of qualitative inquiry in
on-going and future qualitative studies may be enabled by
small shifts in thinking and practice, in line with a
qualitative research paradigm. First, in order to better
ground research in an existing country and system specific
context, some interrogation of constructs and posited
relationships in the existing conceptual framework for
intervention/evaluation may be required. Second, to enable
more in-depth and richer data that documents working
practices and relations under RBF schemes, training of local
researchers should place stronger emphasis on entry to the
field, gaining trust, building rapport, and sustaining a
dialogue with key informants. Third, smaller, more intensive
and focused studies targeting fewer sites and smaller
samples - but addressing a wider range of methods and
informants within the health system - are likely to yield
richer data that can support the understanding of how health
workers and managers are responding to schemes, and what
impact schemes have on service volumes and outputs. |
format |
Working Paper |
author |
Cataldo, Fabian Kielmann, Karina |
author_facet |
Cataldo, Fabian Kielmann, Karina |
author_sort |
Cataldo, Fabian |
title |
Qualitative Research to Enhance the Evaluation of Results-Based Financing Programmes : The Promise and the Reality |
title_short |
Qualitative Research to Enhance the Evaluation of Results-Based Financing Programmes : The Promise and the Reality |
title_full |
Qualitative Research to Enhance the Evaluation of Results-Based Financing Programmes : The Promise and the Reality |
title_fullStr |
Qualitative Research to Enhance the Evaluation of Results-Based Financing Programmes : The Promise and the Reality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Qualitative Research to Enhance the Evaluation of Results-Based Financing Programmes : The Promise and the Reality |
title_sort |
qualitative research to enhance the evaluation of results-based financing programmes : the promise and the reality |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/03/26012500/qualitative-research-enhance-evaluation-results-based-financing-programmes-promise-reality http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24038 |
_version_ |
1764455420540223488 |