Kazakhstan Country Program Evaluation FY04-13 : An Independent Evaluation
Kazakhstan made steady progress on poverty reduction and social development during the review period, driven by impressive economic growth and rising hydrocarbon prices. Yet, the country continues to grapple with a number of systemic challenges, in...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/02/25002403/kazakhstan-country-program-evaluation-fy04-13-independent-evaluation http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23824 |
id |
okr-10986-23824 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English en_US |
topic |
TARIFFS CAPITAL MARKETS FISH UNEMPLOYMENT RATES STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT ECONOMIC GROWTH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICY ENVIRONMENT CARBON DIOXIDE AIR QUALITY WASTE MANAGEMENT FOREST MANAGEMENT CARBON ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS EXPECTATIONS FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PRODUCERS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT HEAVY METALS BALANCE OF PAYMENTS STRATEGIES RESOURCE ALLOCATION LABOR FORCE EMISSIONS POLITICAL ECONOMY REVENUES ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES INCENTIVES CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS DRINKING WATER QUALITY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INFLATION ECONOMIC ANALYSIS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES AUDITS RESOURCE USE BUDGET ECONOMIC ACTIVITY PRESENT VALUE POLLUTION CONTROL LAWS FISCAL POLICIES EXPLOITATION OIL PRICES ARABLE LAND DRYLANDS AIR POLLUTION OIL NATURAL CAPITAL POPULATION GROWTH CORPORATE INCOME TAXES CAPITAL FORMATION LABOR PRODUCTIVITY OPTIONS POLLUTION LEVELS DEBT LAND DEGRADATION POLLUTION CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS FORESTRY ECONOMIC POLICIES NATURAL RESOURCES METALS SUBSIDIES EFFICIENCY RANGELANDS CARBON EMISSIONS TAXES CANCER ACCESS TO INFORMATION EFFECTIVE USE ENTITLEMENTS RESOURCES NATURAL MONOPOLIES UNEMPLOYMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION DEREGULATION EQUITY CAPITAL WAGES CLIMATE CHANGE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT VALUES BANK CREDIT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS PURCHASING POWER DIVISION OF LABOR DEMAND CPI ABATEMENT SUSTAINABLE USE MINES NATIONAL INCOME ELECTRICITY GENERATION ENVIRONMENTS EXPENDITURES TAX RATES ENVIRONMENT ECONOMICS SECURITIES SUBSIDIARY ENERGY EFFICIENCY GOVERNANCE FISHERIES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TRADE LAND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS DRINKING WATER HEALTH PROBLEMS COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE COAL FARMS COMPETITIVE MARKETS AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES WATER POLLUTION REVENUE POLLUTION CONTROL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH LIVING CONDITIONS TAX REFORM ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INSTRUMENTS GOVERNMENTS PRICES OIL SECTOR ECONOMIES COMPETITION ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES |
spellingShingle |
TARIFFS CAPITAL MARKETS FISH UNEMPLOYMENT RATES STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT ECONOMIC GROWTH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICY ENVIRONMENT CARBON DIOXIDE AIR QUALITY WASTE MANAGEMENT FOREST MANAGEMENT CARBON ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS EXPECTATIONS FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PRODUCERS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT HEAVY METALS BALANCE OF PAYMENTS STRATEGIES RESOURCE ALLOCATION LABOR FORCE EMISSIONS POLITICAL ECONOMY REVENUES ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES INCENTIVES CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS DRINKING WATER QUALITY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INFLATION ECONOMIC ANALYSIS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES AUDITS RESOURCE USE BUDGET ECONOMIC ACTIVITY PRESENT VALUE POLLUTION CONTROL LAWS FISCAL POLICIES EXPLOITATION OIL PRICES ARABLE LAND DRYLANDS AIR POLLUTION OIL NATURAL CAPITAL POPULATION GROWTH CORPORATE INCOME TAXES CAPITAL FORMATION LABOR PRODUCTIVITY OPTIONS POLLUTION LEVELS DEBT LAND DEGRADATION POLLUTION CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS FORESTRY ECONOMIC POLICIES NATURAL RESOURCES METALS SUBSIDIES EFFICIENCY RANGELANDS CARBON EMISSIONS TAXES CANCER ACCESS TO INFORMATION EFFECTIVE USE ENTITLEMENTS RESOURCES NATURAL MONOPOLIES UNEMPLOYMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION DEREGULATION EQUITY CAPITAL WAGES CLIMATE CHANGE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT VALUES BANK CREDIT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS PURCHASING POWER DIVISION OF LABOR DEMAND CPI ABATEMENT SUSTAINABLE USE MINES NATIONAL INCOME ELECTRICITY GENERATION ENVIRONMENTS EXPENDITURES TAX RATES ENVIRONMENT ECONOMICS SECURITIES SUBSIDIARY ENERGY EFFICIENCY GOVERNANCE FISHERIES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TRADE LAND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS DRINKING WATER HEALTH PROBLEMS COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE COAL FARMS COMPETITIVE MARKETS AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES WATER POLLUTION REVENUE POLLUTION CONTROL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH LIVING CONDITIONS TAX REFORM ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INSTRUMENTS GOVERNMENTS PRICES OIL SECTOR ECONOMIES COMPETITION ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES Independent Evaluation Group Kazakhstan Country Program Evaluation FY04-13 : An Independent Evaluation |
geographic_facet |
Europe and Central Asia Kazakhstan |
description |
Kazakhstan made steady progress on
poverty reduction and social development during the review
period, driven by impressive economic growth and rising
hydrocarbon prices. Yet, the country continues to grapple
with a number of systemic challenges, including: a lack of
progress on economic diversification and anticorruption; a
dominant role of the state in the economy; a lack of skills
in the labor force; and a legacy of environmental problems
inherited from the Soviet era. The quality of the Bank Group
dialogue with the government was exceptionally high
throughout the evaluation period. The Bank Group has
established itself as a trusted adviser to the government,
with a proven track record of timely delivery of
high-quality technical and policy advice, including
cabinet-level ‘brainstorming sessions’ and the client-funded
Joint Economic Research Program (JERP). Implementation of
the JERP suggests that it could become a powerful tool for
strengthening the partnership, advancing the reform agenda,
and gradually building up the lending program. At the same
time, the fully demand-driven nature of the program imposed
limitations on the Bank in defining strategic priorities in
its advisory work, disseminating findings, and engaging
local partners. Looking forward, the Bank Group will need to
(i) link the JERP with concrete sector investments and
advance monitoring and evaluation (M&E) tools to track
its effectiveness; (ii) disclose the main policy
recommendations; (iii) engage local partners and civil
society to advance transparency and accountability and build
capacity; (iv) select and prepare of a set of analytical
products independently and in line with the World Bank
Group’s global development mandate; and (v) be more
selective and strategic in sector engagement. |
format |
Report |
author |
Independent Evaluation Group |
author_facet |
Independent Evaluation Group |
author_sort |
Independent Evaluation Group |
title |
Kazakhstan Country Program Evaluation FY04-13 : An Independent Evaluation |
title_short |
Kazakhstan Country Program Evaluation FY04-13 : An Independent Evaluation |
title_full |
Kazakhstan Country Program Evaluation FY04-13 : An Independent Evaluation |
title_fullStr |
Kazakhstan Country Program Evaluation FY04-13 : An Independent Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Kazakhstan Country Program Evaluation FY04-13 : An Independent Evaluation |
title_sort |
kazakhstan country program evaluation fy04-13 : an independent evaluation |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/02/25002403/kazakhstan-country-program-evaluation-fy04-13-independent-evaluation http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23824 |
_version_ |
1764454783098290176 |
spelling |
okr-10986-238242021-04-23T14:04:17Z Kazakhstan Country Program Evaluation FY04-13 : An Independent Evaluation Independent Evaluation Group TARIFFS CAPITAL MARKETS FISH UNEMPLOYMENT RATES STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT ECONOMIC GROWTH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICY ENVIRONMENT CARBON DIOXIDE AIR QUALITY WASTE MANAGEMENT FOREST MANAGEMENT CARBON ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS EXPECTATIONS FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PRODUCERS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT HEAVY METALS BALANCE OF PAYMENTS STRATEGIES RESOURCE ALLOCATION LABOR FORCE EMISSIONS POLITICAL ECONOMY REVENUES ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES INCENTIVES CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS DRINKING WATER QUALITY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INFLATION ECONOMIC ANALYSIS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES AUDITS RESOURCE USE BUDGET ECONOMIC ACTIVITY PRESENT VALUE POLLUTION CONTROL LAWS FISCAL POLICIES EXPLOITATION OIL PRICES ARABLE LAND DRYLANDS AIR POLLUTION OIL NATURAL CAPITAL POPULATION GROWTH CORPORATE INCOME TAXES CAPITAL FORMATION LABOR PRODUCTIVITY OPTIONS POLLUTION LEVELS DEBT LAND DEGRADATION POLLUTION CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS FORESTRY ECONOMIC POLICIES NATURAL RESOURCES METALS SUBSIDIES EFFICIENCY RANGELANDS CARBON EMISSIONS TAXES CANCER ACCESS TO INFORMATION EFFECTIVE USE ENTITLEMENTS RESOURCES NATURAL MONOPOLIES UNEMPLOYMENT ENERGY CONSUMPTION DEREGULATION EQUITY CAPITAL WAGES CLIMATE CHANGE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT VALUES BANK CREDIT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS PURCHASING POWER DIVISION OF LABOR DEMAND CPI ABATEMENT SUSTAINABLE USE MINES NATIONAL INCOME ELECTRICITY GENERATION ENVIRONMENTS EXPENDITURES TAX RATES ENVIRONMENT ECONOMICS SECURITIES SUBSIDIARY ENERGY EFFICIENCY GOVERNANCE FISHERIES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TRADE LAND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS DRINKING WATER HEALTH PROBLEMS COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE COAL FARMS COMPETITIVE MARKETS AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES WATER POLLUTION REVENUE POLLUTION CONTROL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH LIVING CONDITIONS TAX REFORM ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INSTRUMENTS GOVERNMENTS PRICES OIL SECTOR ECONOMIES COMPETITION ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES Kazakhstan made steady progress on poverty reduction and social development during the review period, driven by impressive economic growth and rising hydrocarbon prices. Yet, the country continues to grapple with a number of systemic challenges, including: a lack of progress on economic diversification and anticorruption; a dominant role of the state in the economy; a lack of skills in the labor force; and a legacy of environmental problems inherited from the Soviet era. The quality of the Bank Group dialogue with the government was exceptionally high throughout the evaluation period. The Bank Group has established itself as a trusted adviser to the government, with a proven track record of timely delivery of high-quality technical and policy advice, including cabinet-level ‘brainstorming sessions’ and the client-funded Joint Economic Research Program (JERP). Implementation of the JERP suggests that it could become a powerful tool for strengthening the partnership, advancing the reform agenda, and gradually building up the lending program. At the same time, the fully demand-driven nature of the program imposed limitations on the Bank in defining strategic priorities in its advisory work, disseminating findings, and engaging local partners. Looking forward, the Bank Group will need to (i) link the JERP with concrete sector investments and advance monitoring and evaluation (M&E) tools to track its effectiveness; (ii) disclose the main policy recommendations; (iii) engage local partners and civil society to advance transparency and accountability and build capacity; (iv) select and prepare of a set of analytical products independently and in line with the World Bank Group’s global development mandate; and (v) be more selective and strategic in sector engagement. 2016-03-02T20:03:33Z 2016-03-02T20:03:33Z 2015 Report http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/02/25002403/kazakhstan-country-program-evaluation-fy04-13-independent-evaluation http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23824 English en_US CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Working Paper Europe and Central Asia Kazakhstan |