Bulgaria Judicial Performance, Caseload and Expenditure Review (2008-2014)

The World Bank published a Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (PEIR) of the Bulgarian justice sector entitled “Resourcing the Judiciary for Performance and Accountability: A Judicial Public Expenditure and Institutional Review” in 2008. The objective of the present study is to conduct an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Format: Report
Language:English
en_US
Published: Washington, DC 2015
Subjects:
EU
LAW
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/11/25301298/bulgaria-judicial-performance-caseload-expenditure-review-2008-2014
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23239
id okr-10986-23239
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-232392021-04-23T14:04:13Z Bulgaria Judicial Performance, Caseload and Expenditure Review (2008-2014) World Bank BENEFIT COURT FINANCING QUALITY OF JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE CRIMINAL JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT LAWS GUARANTEES SALARY APPELLATE COURTS GOOD GOVERNANCE ASSET LEGAL ASSISTANCE RESTRUCTURING PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT REORGANIZATION REGULATORY REFORMS SALARIES SUBSIDY LEGAL ENTITIES CRIME CORRUPTION JUDICIAL DISTRICTS WILL PAYMENTS COURT RESTRUCTURING BUDGET RESIGNATION ORGANIZATION OF COURTS JURISDICTIONS COURTS ARBITRATION JUDICIAL STATISTICS DISPOSITIONS PENALTIES JUDICIAL POSITIONS TITLE JUDGE PROSECUTORS RESTRUCTURING JUDICIAL REFORM MAGISTRATES COURT HEARING DOMICILE EU CASES JUDGES LEGISLATION SOCIAL SECURITY RESEARCH JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES DISTRICT COURTS LEGALITY AUDIT OFFICE JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE RULE OF LAW SUBSIDIES LEGAL FRAMEWORK JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS JUDICIAL POWER JUDICIAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS ACCESS TO JUSTICE JURISDICTION WAGES IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES INSUFFICIENT FUNDS POLICE CRIMES BUDGETS JUDICIAL COUNCIL CLAIMS PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIARY JUDICIAL SERVICES RESTRUCTURING PROCESS OFFENCES ALLOCATION OF FUNDS AGENCIES PROPERTY LEGAL AID PROPERTIES ACCOUNTANT COURT FILING ASSETS CONSTITUTIONAL COURT JUDICIAL BRANCH MILITARY COURTS ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS CLAIMANTS CAPITAL GOODS ENFORCEMENT ECONOMIC STAGNATION JUSTICE HUMAN RIGHTS FAIR TRIAL EXISTING LAW DISMISSAL NATIONAL BANK COURT PROCESSES LEGAL PERSONS JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE JUDICIAL SYSTEMS LEGAL CHANGES COURT OF APPEAL JUDICIARY CRIMINAL CASES JUDGMENTS DISPOSITION JUDICIAL RESOURCES RESTRUCTURING PROGRAM LAW JUSTICE SYSTEM INVESTIGATORS COURT SYSTEMS EXCHANGE RATE INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK JUDICIAL REVIEW JUDICIAL STAFF COURT STATISTICS JUDICIAL SECTOR JUVENILE JUSTICE GUARANTEE EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION COURT SYSTEM JUDICIAL BODIES ESTATE The World Bank published a Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (PEIR) of the Bulgarian justice sector entitled “Resourcing the Judiciary for Performance and Accountability: A Judicial Public Expenditure and Institutional Review” in 2008. The objective of the present study is to conduct an assessment of the spending and institutional changes in Bulgaria’s judiciary from 2008 onwards. The current report examines the principal trends in resourcing Bulgaria’s judiciary since 2008, while comparing the expenditure and judicial performance with those of other European countries. The report provides a set of conclusion and recommendations for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of Bulgaria’s judiciary and the judicial budget process. 2015-12-08T20:28:14Z 2015-12-08T20:28:14Z 2015-11 Report http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/11/25301298/bulgaria-judicial-performance-caseload-expenditure-review-2008-2014 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23239 English en_US CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work :: Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment Europe and Central Asia Bulgaria
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic BENEFIT
COURT
FINANCING
QUALITY OF JUSTICE
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
CRIMINAL
JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
LAWS
GUARANTEES
SALARY
APPELLATE COURTS
GOOD GOVERNANCE
ASSET
LEGAL ASSISTANCE
RESTRUCTURING PLAN
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
REORGANIZATION
REGULATORY REFORMS
SALARIES
SUBSIDY
LEGAL ENTITIES
CRIME
CORRUPTION
JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
WILL
PAYMENTS
COURT RESTRUCTURING
BUDGET
RESIGNATION
ORGANIZATION OF COURTS
JURISDICTIONS
COURTS
ARBITRATION
JUDICIAL STATISTICS
DISPOSITIONS
PENALTIES
JUDICIAL POSITIONS
TITLE
JUDGE
PROSECUTORS
RESTRUCTURING
JUDICIAL REFORM
MAGISTRATES
COURT HEARING
DOMICILE
EU
CASES
JUDGES
LEGISLATION
SOCIAL SECURITY
RESEARCH
JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES
DISTRICT COURTS
LEGALITY
AUDIT OFFICE
JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE
RULE OF LAW
SUBSIDIES
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS
JUDICIAL POWER
JUDICIAL SYSTEM
REGULATIONS
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
JURISDICTION
WAGES
IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES
INSUFFICIENT FUNDS
POLICE
CRIMES
BUDGETS
JUDICIAL COUNCIL
CLAIMS
PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIARY
JUDICIAL SERVICES
RESTRUCTURING PROCESS
OFFENCES
ALLOCATION OF FUNDS
AGENCIES
PROPERTY
LEGAL AID
PROPERTIES
ACCOUNTANT
COURT FILING
ASSETS
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
JUDICIAL BRANCH
MILITARY COURTS
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
CLAIMANTS
CAPITAL GOODS
ENFORCEMENT
ECONOMIC STAGNATION
JUSTICE
HUMAN RIGHTS
FAIR TRIAL
EXISTING LAW
DISMISSAL
NATIONAL BANK
COURT PROCESSES
LEGAL PERSONS
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE
JUDICIAL SYSTEMS
LEGAL CHANGES
COURT OF APPEAL
JUDICIARY
CRIMINAL CASES
JUDGMENTS
DISPOSITION
JUDICIAL RESOURCES
RESTRUCTURING PROGRAM
LAW
JUSTICE SYSTEM
INVESTIGATORS
COURT SYSTEMS
EXCHANGE RATE
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
JUDICIAL REVIEW
JUDICIAL STAFF
COURT STATISTICS
JUDICIAL SECTOR
JUVENILE JUSTICE
GUARANTEE
EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION
COURT SYSTEM
JUDICIAL BODIES
ESTATE
spellingShingle BENEFIT
COURT
FINANCING
QUALITY OF JUSTICE
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
CRIMINAL
JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
LAWS
GUARANTEES
SALARY
APPELLATE COURTS
GOOD GOVERNANCE
ASSET
LEGAL ASSISTANCE
RESTRUCTURING PLAN
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
REORGANIZATION
REGULATORY REFORMS
SALARIES
SUBSIDY
LEGAL ENTITIES
CRIME
CORRUPTION
JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
WILL
PAYMENTS
COURT RESTRUCTURING
BUDGET
RESIGNATION
ORGANIZATION OF COURTS
JURISDICTIONS
COURTS
ARBITRATION
JUDICIAL STATISTICS
DISPOSITIONS
PENALTIES
JUDICIAL POSITIONS
TITLE
JUDGE
PROSECUTORS
RESTRUCTURING
JUDICIAL REFORM
MAGISTRATES
COURT HEARING
DOMICILE
EU
CASES
JUDGES
LEGISLATION
SOCIAL SECURITY
RESEARCH
JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES
DISTRICT COURTS
LEGALITY
AUDIT OFFICE
JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE
RULE OF LAW
SUBSIDIES
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS
JUDICIAL POWER
JUDICIAL SYSTEM
REGULATIONS
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
JURISDICTION
WAGES
IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES
INSUFFICIENT FUNDS
POLICE
CRIMES
BUDGETS
JUDICIAL COUNCIL
CLAIMS
PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIARY
JUDICIAL SERVICES
RESTRUCTURING PROCESS
OFFENCES
ALLOCATION OF FUNDS
AGENCIES
PROPERTY
LEGAL AID
PROPERTIES
ACCOUNTANT
COURT FILING
ASSETS
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
JUDICIAL BRANCH
MILITARY COURTS
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
CLAIMANTS
CAPITAL GOODS
ENFORCEMENT
ECONOMIC STAGNATION
JUSTICE
HUMAN RIGHTS
FAIR TRIAL
EXISTING LAW
DISMISSAL
NATIONAL BANK
COURT PROCESSES
LEGAL PERSONS
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE
JUDICIAL SYSTEMS
LEGAL CHANGES
COURT OF APPEAL
JUDICIARY
CRIMINAL CASES
JUDGMENTS
DISPOSITION
JUDICIAL RESOURCES
RESTRUCTURING PROGRAM
LAW
JUSTICE SYSTEM
INVESTIGATORS
COURT SYSTEMS
EXCHANGE RATE
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
JUDICIAL REVIEW
JUDICIAL STAFF
COURT STATISTICS
JUDICIAL SECTOR
JUVENILE JUSTICE
GUARANTEE
EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION
COURT SYSTEM
JUDICIAL BODIES
ESTATE
World Bank
Bulgaria Judicial Performance, Caseload and Expenditure Review (2008-2014)
geographic_facet Europe and Central Asia
Bulgaria
description The World Bank published a Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (PEIR) of the Bulgarian justice sector entitled “Resourcing the Judiciary for Performance and Accountability: A Judicial Public Expenditure and Institutional Review” in 2008. The objective of the present study is to conduct an assessment of the spending and institutional changes in Bulgaria’s judiciary from 2008 onwards. The current report examines the principal trends in resourcing Bulgaria’s judiciary since 2008, while comparing the expenditure and judicial performance with those of other European countries. The report provides a set of conclusion and recommendations for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of Bulgaria’s judiciary and the judicial budget process.
format Report
author World Bank
author_facet World Bank
author_sort World Bank
title Bulgaria Judicial Performance, Caseload and Expenditure Review (2008-2014)
title_short Bulgaria Judicial Performance, Caseload and Expenditure Review (2008-2014)
title_full Bulgaria Judicial Performance, Caseload and Expenditure Review (2008-2014)
title_fullStr Bulgaria Judicial Performance, Caseload and Expenditure Review (2008-2014)
title_full_unstemmed Bulgaria Judicial Performance, Caseload and Expenditure Review (2008-2014)
title_sort bulgaria judicial performance, caseload and expenditure review (2008-2014)
publisher Washington, DC
publishDate 2015
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/11/25301298/bulgaria-judicial-performance-caseload-expenditure-review-2008-2014
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23239
_version_ 1764453269375025152