Republic of Niger : Measuring Poverty Trends
Accurately measuring poverty and assessing trends in its incidence and severity are among the most fundamental challenges in economic development. The issue of effective poverty measurement has been the subject of renewed interest since the United...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/05/24603339/niger-measuring-poverty-trends-methodological-analytical-issues http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22808 |
Summary: | Accurately measuring poverty and
assessing trends in its incidence and severity are among the
most fundamental challenges in economic development. The
issue of effective poverty measurement has been the subject
of renewed interest since the United Nations adopted the
millennium development goals (MDGs) in 2000. In Niger, as in
many comparable countries worldwide, poverty data are
collected through household surveys of consumption patterns
and living conditions. A number of methodological factors
can affect the accuracy of consumption data during the
collection phase, especially the number of survey visits,
the time of year during which the questionnaire is
administered, the recall period, and the composition of the
consumption basket defined in the survey. The purpose of
this paper is to produce a robust analysis of poverty trends
in Niger from 2005 to 2011 by using the 2011 survey as the
basis for monitoring poverty and correcting for
methodological differences in earlier surveys. The decision
to use the 2011 survey as the basis for establishing
methodological consistency is rooted in two factors. First,
the large variations in poverty estimates obtained in
different survey periods are suspected to be due in part to
changes in the survey methodology. Second, the 2011 survey
coincided with the adoption of Niger’s current growth and
poverty reduction strategy, programme de développement
economique et social (PDES). The report describes the 2011
survey methodology and the techniques used to make the
previous figures compatible with this methodology. It
presents the revised poverty figures and discusses their
implications. It also offers conclusions and recommendations. |
---|