Inequality of Opportunity : Reply to Pedro Rosa Dias and Erik Schokkaert

We welcome the comments of Pedro Rosa Dias and Erik Schokkaert on our Editorial as a means of stimulating further debate on the usefulness of estimates of inequality of opportunity, especially for policy purposes. Our responses to their comments are in three categories. First, they broadly agree wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanbur, Ravi, Wagstaff, Adam
Format: Journal Article
Language:en_US
Published: Wiley 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22766
id okr-10986-22766
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-227662021-04-23T14:04:11Z Inequality of Opportunity : Reply to Pedro Rosa Dias and Erik Schokkaert Kanbur, Ravi Wagstaff, Adam inequality of opportunity We welcome the comments of Pedro Rosa Dias and Erik Schokkaert on our Editorial as a means of stimulating further debate on the usefulness of estimates of inequality of opportunity, especially for policy purposes. Our responses to their comments are in three categories. First, they broadly agree with many of our criticisms of the Paes de Barros et al. approach to measuring inequality of opportunity, but they say that these criticisms are already well appreciated in the literature. We beg to differ. Given our knowledge of work in policy settings, we believe that strong health warnings are in order. Second, we feel they do not sufficiently engage with a number of our points, including on talent and on luck. Third, while we agree with them that a strong focus on the income–health gradient leaves out many other considerations, we would nevertheless continue to argue for this focus on pragmatic grounds in the realm of policy. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions. http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-820227.html 2015-10-09T19:51:53Z 2015-10-09T19:51:53Z 2015-06-24 Journal Article Health Economics 1099-1050 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22766 en_US For non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions. http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-820227.html World Bank Wiley Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Journal Article
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language en_US
topic inequality of opportunity
spellingShingle inequality of opportunity
Kanbur, Ravi
Wagstaff, Adam
Inequality of Opportunity : Reply to Pedro Rosa Dias and Erik Schokkaert
description We welcome the comments of Pedro Rosa Dias and Erik Schokkaert on our Editorial as a means of stimulating further debate on the usefulness of estimates of inequality of opportunity, especially for policy purposes. Our responses to their comments are in three categories. First, they broadly agree with many of our criticisms of the Paes de Barros et al. approach to measuring inequality of opportunity, but they say that these criticisms are already well appreciated in the literature. We beg to differ. Given our knowledge of work in policy settings, we believe that strong health warnings are in order. Second, we feel they do not sufficiently engage with a number of our points, including on talent and on luck. Third, while we agree with them that a strong focus on the income–health gradient leaves out many other considerations, we would nevertheless continue to argue for this focus on pragmatic grounds in the realm of policy. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions. http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-820227.html
format Journal Article
author Kanbur, Ravi
Wagstaff, Adam
author_facet Kanbur, Ravi
Wagstaff, Adam
author_sort Kanbur, Ravi
title Inequality of Opportunity : Reply to Pedro Rosa Dias and Erik Schokkaert
title_short Inequality of Opportunity : Reply to Pedro Rosa Dias and Erik Schokkaert
title_full Inequality of Opportunity : Reply to Pedro Rosa Dias and Erik Schokkaert
title_fullStr Inequality of Opportunity : Reply to Pedro Rosa Dias and Erik Schokkaert
title_full_unstemmed Inequality of Opportunity : Reply to Pedro Rosa Dias and Erik Schokkaert
title_sort inequality of opportunity : reply to pedro rosa dias and erik schokkaert
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22766
_version_ 1764452166284607488