Electoral Rules and Political Selection : Theory and Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanistan
Voters commonly face a choice between competent candidates and those with policy preferences similar to their own. This paper explores how electoral rules, such as district magnitude, mediate this trade-off and affect the composition of representat...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/07/24775055/electoral-rules-political-selection-theory-evidence-field-experiment-afghanistan http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22446 |
Summary: | Voters commonly face a choice between
competent candidates and those with policy preferences
similar to their own. This paper explores how electoral
rules, such as district magnitude, mediate this trade-off
and affect the composition of representative bodies and
policy outcomes. The paper shows formally that anticipation
of bargaining over policy causes voters in elections with
multiple single-member districts to prefer candidates with
polarized policy positions over more competent candidates.
Results from a unique field experiment in Afghanistan are
consistent with these predictions. Specifically,
representatives elected in elections with a single
multi-member district are better educated and exhibit less
extreme policy preferences. |
---|