Formulas for Failure? : Were the Doha Tariff Formulas Too Ambitious for Success?

This paper views tariff-cutting formulas as a potential solution to the free-rider problem that arises when market opening is negotiated bilaterally and extended on a most-favored-nation basis. The negotiators in the Doha Agenda chose formulas that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laborde, David, Martin, Will
Format: Working Paper
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/06/24619553/formulas-failure-doha-tariff-formulas-too-ambitious-success
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22176
id okr-10986-22176
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-221762021-04-23T14:04:07Z Formulas for Failure? : Were the Doha Tariff Formulas Too Ambitious for Success? Laborde, David Martin, Will TARIFFS TRADE VOLUMES MULTILATERAL TRADE POLITICAL-SUPPORT TARIFF RATES WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION TRADE NEGOTIATIONS BILATERAL NEGOTIATIONS INTEREST TARIFF NEGOTIATION ECONOMIC WELFARE AGRICULTURAL MARKET ACCESS TRADE BARRIERS EXCHANGE OPTION TARIFF CHANGES EXPORTS DEVELOPING COUNTRIES EXPORTERS POLITICAL ECONOMY DEMAND ELASTICITIES AGRICULTURAL INTERESTS REVENUES WELFARE FUNCTION TARIFF CONCESSIONS ECONOMIC POLICY PROTECTION FOR SALE MARKET ACCESS OPPORTUNITIES PRICE HIGH TARIFFS MARKET ACCESS BENEFICIARIES INTERNATIONAL BANK TRADE EXPANSION DEVELOPING COUNTRY BORDER MEASURES AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION AGRICULTURAL TARIFF LACK OF TRANSPARENCY AGRICULTURAL MARKETS REDUCTION IN TARIFFS AVERAGE TARIFFS PRODUCTS TRADING FREE ACCESS OPTIONS TARIFF REVENUES DEMAND CURVES COMMERCIAL POLICY MARKETS TARIFF REDUCTIONS WORLD PRICES CUTTING ACCESS INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS WELFARE GAINS IMPORTS RATE QUOTAS TRADE POLICY PRODUCT MARKET ACCESS NEGOTIATIONS MULTILATERAL REFORMS VOLUME PRICE CHANGE EXPENDITURE APPLIED TARIFF TRADE VOLUME MULTILATERAL AGREEMENTS GOOD AGRICULTURAL TARIFFS TRANSPARENCY TARIFF STRUCTURE VALUE CONCESSIONS TRADE ORGANIZATION DEMAND TRADE PROTECTION PRICE EFFECTS TRADE REFORM AGRICULTURAL SECTOR AGRICULTURE ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY SALE MARKET TRADE LIBERALIZATION AGRICULTURAL MARKET COTTON MARKET ACCESS CONCESSIONS AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS INTERESTS TRADE GOODS TARIFF ESCALATION GLOBAL TRADE AGRICULTURAL NEGOTIATIONS TARIFF STRUCTURE HOUSEHOLDS SHARE IMPORT VOLUMES INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT TARIFF REVENUE SINGLE TARIFF EXPORT WORLD TRADE COMMODITIES TARIFF RATE INSTRUMENT AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENT MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS TRADING PARTNERS AGRICULTURAL TRADE GUARANTEE PRICES This paper views tariff-cutting formulas as a potential solution to the free-rider problem that arises when market opening is negotiated bilaterally and extended on a most-favored-nation basis. The negotiators in the Doha Agenda chose formulas that are ideal from an economic efficiency viewpoint in that they most sharply reduce the highest and most economically-costly tariffs. When the political support that gave rise to the original tariffs is considered, however, this approach appears to generate very high political costs per unit of gain in economic efficiency. The political costs associated with the formulas appear to have led to strong pressure for many, complex exceptions, which both lowered and increased uncertainty about members’ market access gains. Where tariff cuts focus on applied rates, it seems likely that a proportional cut rule would reduce the political costs of securing agreements. However, detailed examination of the Doha proposals with their product exceptions suggests that negotiators are likely to find cuts with exceptions politically attractive but economically costly when cuts are based on bound tariffs with different degrees of binding overhang. 2015-07-16T15:27:59Z 2015-07-16T15:27:59Z 2015-06 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/06/24619553/formulas-failure-doha-tariff-formulas-too-ambitious-success http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22176 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 7303 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic TARIFFS
TRADE VOLUMES
MULTILATERAL TRADE
POLITICAL-SUPPORT
TARIFF RATES
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
TRADE NEGOTIATIONS
BILATERAL NEGOTIATIONS
INTEREST
TARIFF NEGOTIATION
ECONOMIC WELFARE
AGRICULTURAL MARKET ACCESS
TRADE BARRIERS
EXCHANGE
OPTION
TARIFF CHANGES
EXPORTS
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
EXPORTERS
POLITICAL ECONOMY
DEMAND ELASTICITIES
AGRICULTURAL INTERESTS
REVENUES
WELFARE FUNCTION
TARIFF CONCESSIONS
ECONOMIC POLICY
PROTECTION FOR SALE
MARKET ACCESS OPPORTUNITIES
PRICE
HIGH TARIFFS
MARKET ACCESS
BENEFICIARIES
INTERNATIONAL BANK
TRADE EXPANSION
DEVELOPING COUNTRY
BORDER MEASURES
AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION
AGRICULTURAL TARIFF
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY
AGRICULTURAL MARKETS
REDUCTION IN TARIFFS
AVERAGE TARIFFS
PRODUCTS
TRADING
FREE ACCESS
OPTIONS
TARIFF REVENUES
DEMAND CURVES
COMMERCIAL POLICY
MARKETS
TARIFF REDUCTIONS
WORLD PRICES
CUTTING
ACCESS
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS
WELFARE GAINS
IMPORTS
RATE QUOTAS
TRADE POLICY
PRODUCT
MARKET ACCESS NEGOTIATIONS
MULTILATERAL REFORMS
VOLUME
PRICE CHANGE
EXPENDITURE
APPLIED TARIFF
TRADE VOLUME
MULTILATERAL AGREEMENTS
GOOD
AGRICULTURAL TARIFFS
TRANSPARENCY
TARIFF STRUCTURE
VALUE
CONCESSIONS
TRADE ORGANIZATION
DEMAND
TRADE PROTECTION
PRICE EFFECTS
TRADE REFORM
AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
AGRICULTURE
ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY
SALE
MARKET
TRADE LIBERALIZATION
AGRICULTURAL MARKET
COTTON
MARKET ACCESS CONCESSIONS
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS
INTERESTS
TRADE
GOODS
TARIFF ESCALATION
GLOBAL TRADE
AGRICULTURAL NEGOTIATIONS
TARIFF STRUCTURE
HOUSEHOLDS
SHARE
IMPORT VOLUMES
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT
TARIFF
REVENUE
SINGLE TARIFF
EXPORT
WORLD TRADE
COMMODITIES
TARIFF RATE
INSTRUMENT
AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENT
MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS
TRADING PARTNERS
AGRICULTURAL TRADE
GUARANTEE
PRICES
spellingShingle TARIFFS
TRADE VOLUMES
MULTILATERAL TRADE
POLITICAL-SUPPORT
TARIFF RATES
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
TRADE NEGOTIATIONS
BILATERAL NEGOTIATIONS
INTEREST
TARIFF NEGOTIATION
ECONOMIC WELFARE
AGRICULTURAL MARKET ACCESS
TRADE BARRIERS
EXCHANGE
OPTION
TARIFF CHANGES
EXPORTS
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
EXPORTERS
POLITICAL ECONOMY
DEMAND ELASTICITIES
AGRICULTURAL INTERESTS
REVENUES
WELFARE FUNCTION
TARIFF CONCESSIONS
ECONOMIC POLICY
PROTECTION FOR SALE
MARKET ACCESS OPPORTUNITIES
PRICE
HIGH TARIFFS
MARKET ACCESS
BENEFICIARIES
INTERNATIONAL BANK
TRADE EXPANSION
DEVELOPING COUNTRY
BORDER MEASURES
AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION
AGRICULTURAL TARIFF
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY
AGRICULTURAL MARKETS
REDUCTION IN TARIFFS
AVERAGE TARIFFS
PRODUCTS
TRADING
FREE ACCESS
OPTIONS
TARIFF REVENUES
DEMAND CURVES
COMMERCIAL POLICY
MARKETS
TARIFF REDUCTIONS
WORLD PRICES
CUTTING
ACCESS
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS
WELFARE GAINS
IMPORTS
RATE QUOTAS
TRADE POLICY
PRODUCT
MARKET ACCESS NEGOTIATIONS
MULTILATERAL REFORMS
VOLUME
PRICE CHANGE
EXPENDITURE
APPLIED TARIFF
TRADE VOLUME
MULTILATERAL AGREEMENTS
GOOD
AGRICULTURAL TARIFFS
TRANSPARENCY
TARIFF STRUCTURE
VALUE
CONCESSIONS
TRADE ORGANIZATION
DEMAND
TRADE PROTECTION
PRICE EFFECTS
TRADE REFORM
AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
AGRICULTURE
ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY
SALE
MARKET
TRADE LIBERALIZATION
AGRICULTURAL MARKET
COTTON
MARKET ACCESS CONCESSIONS
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS
INTERESTS
TRADE
GOODS
TARIFF ESCALATION
GLOBAL TRADE
AGRICULTURAL NEGOTIATIONS
TARIFF STRUCTURE
HOUSEHOLDS
SHARE
IMPORT VOLUMES
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT
TARIFF
REVENUE
SINGLE TARIFF
EXPORT
WORLD TRADE
COMMODITIES
TARIFF RATE
INSTRUMENT
AGRICULTURAL AGREEMENT
MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS
TRADING PARTNERS
AGRICULTURAL TRADE
GUARANTEE
PRICES
Laborde, David
Martin, Will
Formulas for Failure? : Were the Doha Tariff Formulas Too Ambitious for Success?
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No. 7303
description This paper views tariff-cutting formulas as a potential solution to the free-rider problem that arises when market opening is negotiated bilaterally and extended on a most-favored-nation basis. The negotiators in the Doha Agenda chose formulas that are ideal from an economic efficiency viewpoint in that they most sharply reduce the highest and most economically-costly tariffs. When the political support that gave rise to the original tariffs is considered, however, this approach appears to generate very high political costs per unit of gain in economic efficiency. The political costs associated with the formulas appear to have led to strong pressure for many, complex exceptions, which both lowered and increased uncertainty about members’ market access gains. Where tariff cuts focus on applied rates, it seems likely that a proportional cut rule would reduce the political costs of securing agreements. However, detailed examination of the Doha proposals with their product exceptions suggests that negotiators are likely to find cuts with exceptions politically attractive but economically costly when cuts are based on bound tariffs with different degrees of binding overhang.
format Working Paper
author Laborde, David
Martin, Will
author_facet Laborde, David
Martin, Will
author_sort Laborde, David
title Formulas for Failure? : Were the Doha Tariff Formulas Too Ambitious for Success?
title_short Formulas for Failure? : Were the Doha Tariff Formulas Too Ambitious for Success?
title_full Formulas for Failure? : Were the Doha Tariff Formulas Too Ambitious for Success?
title_fullStr Formulas for Failure? : Were the Doha Tariff Formulas Too Ambitious for Success?
title_full_unstemmed Formulas for Failure? : Were the Doha Tariff Formulas Too Ambitious for Success?
title_sort formulas for failure? : were the doha tariff formulas too ambitious for success?
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2015
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/06/24619553/formulas-failure-doha-tariff-formulas-too-ambitious-success
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22176
_version_ 1764450356062846976