Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond

Board evaluation has emerged as a corporate governance priority and brought to the forefront many associated challenges. This is not a revolutionary change. Board assessment procedures are evolving as nations and companies formulate and test divers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Larson, Mary Jo, Pierce, Chris
Format: Working Paper
Language:English
en_US
Published: International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/06/24606693/board-evaluations-insights-india-beyond
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22146
id okr-10986-22146
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-221462021-04-23T14:04:06Z Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond Larson, Mary Jo Pierce, Chris Corporate governance accountability Conduct guidelines Board evaluation has emerged as a corporate governance priority and brought to the forefront many associated challenges. This is not a revolutionary change. Board assessment procedures are evolving as nations and companies formulate and test diverse requirements. Until recently effective Board evaluation was not regarded a Board priority. In 2002, Yale University Professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld commented: ‘I can’t think of a single work group whose performance gets assessed less rigorously than corporate Boards.’ India has moved to the forefront of this governance challenge with its new Companies Act of 2013, which states that the Board of every listed company and other public companies with paid-up capital of Rs 25 crore or more (approximately US$ 4 million) shall report the annual performance evaluation of individual directors, the Board and its committees. However, in the last 12 years the situation has substantially changed. Corporate governance practitioners have been applying Peter Drucker’s idea that ‘what gets measured gets managed,’ and among senior leaders, what gets acknowledged and valued gets done even better. Recognizing the merits of various approaches, we highlight the Board’s leadership culture, the tone at the top, as an essential feature of an effective assessment process. Board evaluation is driven by the values and performance expectations of senior leaders in Tata Group, Infosys and other well-known Indian companies. Topics addressed in this article include: incentives for Board evaluation; extent of Board evaluation globally; significant requirements in India; predictable barriers and challenges; case example of Board leadership from India; recommended practices worldwide; and future trends and challenges. 2015-07-13T16:15:43Z 2015-07-13T16:15:43Z 2015-01-01 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/06/24606693/board-evaluations-insights-india-beyond http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22146 English en_US CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/ International Finance Corporation International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Working Paper South Asia India
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic Corporate governance
accountability
Conduct guidelines
spellingShingle Corporate governance
accountability
Conduct guidelines
Larson, Mary Jo
Pierce, Chris
Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond
geographic_facet South Asia
India
description Board evaluation has emerged as a corporate governance priority and brought to the forefront many associated challenges. This is not a revolutionary change. Board assessment procedures are evolving as nations and companies formulate and test diverse requirements. Until recently effective Board evaluation was not regarded a Board priority. In 2002, Yale University Professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld commented: ‘I can’t think of a single work group whose performance gets assessed less rigorously than corporate Boards.’ India has moved to the forefront of this governance challenge with its new Companies Act of 2013, which states that the Board of every listed company and other public companies with paid-up capital of Rs 25 crore or more (approximately US$ 4 million) shall report the annual performance evaluation of individual directors, the Board and its committees. However, in the last 12 years the situation has substantially changed. Corporate governance practitioners have been applying Peter Drucker’s idea that ‘what gets measured gets managed,’ and among senior leaders, what gets acknowledged and valued gets done even better. Recognizing the merits of various approaches, we highlight the Board’s leadership culture, the tone at the top, as an essential feature of an effective assessment process. Board evaluation is driven by the values and performance expectations of senior leaders in Tata Group, Infosys and other well-known Indian companies. Topics addressed in this article include: incentives for Board evaluation; extent of Board evaluation globally; significant requirements in India; predictable barriers and challenges; case example of Board leadership from India; recommended practices worldwide; and future trends and challenges.
format Working Paper
author Larson, Mary Jo
Pierce, Chris
author_facet Larson, Mary Jo
Pierce, Chris
author_sort Larson, Mary Jo
title Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond
title_short Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond
title_full Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond
title_fullStr Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond
title_full_unstemmed Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond
title_sort board evaluations : insights from india and beyond
publisher International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC
publishDate 2015
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/06/24606693/board-evaluations-insights-india-beyond
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22146
_version_ 1764450081026605056