Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond
Board evaluation has emerged as a corporate governance priority and brought to the forefront many associated challenges. This is not a revolutionary change. Board assessment procedures are evolving as nations and companies formulate and test divers...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/06/24606693/board-evaluations-insights-india-beyond http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22146 |
id |
okr-10986-22146 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-221462021-04-23T14:04:06Z Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond Larson, Mary Jo Pierce, Chris Corporate governance accountability Conduct guidelines Board evaluation has emerged as a corporate governance priority and brought to the forefront many associated challenges. This is not a revolutionary change. Board assessment procedures are evolving as nations and companies formulate and test diverse requirements. Until recently effective Board evaluation was not regarded a Board priority. In 2002, Yale University Professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld commented: ‘I can’t think of a single work group whose performance gets assessed less rigorously than corporate Boards.’ India has moved to the forefront of this governance challenge with its new Companies Act of 2013, which states that the Board of every listed company and other public companies with paid-up capital of Rs 25 crore or more (approximately US$ 4 million) shall report the annual performance evaluation of individual directors, the Board and its committees. However, in the last 12 years the situation has substantially changed. Corporate governance practitioners have been applying Peter Drucker’s idea that ‘what gets measured gets managed,’ and among senior leaders, what gets acknowledged and valued gets done even better. Recognizing the merits of various approaches, we highlight the Board’s leadership culture, the tone at the top, as an essential feature of an effective assessment process. Board evaluation is driven by the values and performance expectations of senior leaders in Tata Group, Infosys and other well-known Indian companies. Topics addressed in this article include: incentives for Board evaluation; extent of Board evaluation globally; significant requirements in India; predictable barriers and challenges; case example of Board leadership from India; recommended practices worldwide; and future trends and challenges. 2015-07-13T16:15:43Z 2015-07-13T16:15:43Z 2015-01-01 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/06/24606693/board-evaluations-insights-india-beyond http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22146 English en_US CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/ International Finance Corporation International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Working Paper South Asia India |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English en_US |
topic |
Corporate governance accountability Conduct guidelines |
spellingShingle |
Corporate governance accountability Conduct guidelines Larson, Mary Jo Pierce, Chris Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond |
geographic_facet |
South Asia India |
description |
Board evaluation has emerged as a
corporate governance priority and brought to the forefront
many associated challenges. This is not a revolutionary
change. Board assessment procedures are evolving as nations
and companies formulate and test diverse requirements. Until
recently effective Board evaluation was not regarded a Board
priority. In 2002, Yale University Professor Jeffrey
Sonnenfeld commented: ‘I can’t think of a single work group
whose performance gets assessed less rigorously than
corporate Boards.’ India has moved to the forefront of this
governance challenge with its new Companies Act of 2013,
which states that the Board of every listed company and
other public companies with paid-up capital of Rs 25 crore
or more (approximately US$ 4 million) shall report the
annual performance evaluation of individual directors, the
Board and its committees. However, in the last 12 years the
situation has substantially changed. Corporate governance
practitioners have been applying Peter Drucker’s idea that
‘what gets measured gets managed,’ and among senior leaders,
what gets acknowledged and valued gets done even better.
Recognizing the merits of various approaches, we highlight
the Board’s leadership culture, the tone at the top, as an
essential feature of an effective assessment process. Board
evaluation is driven by the values and performance
expectations of senior leaders in Tata Group, Infosys and
other well-known Indian companies. Topics addressed in this
article include: incentives for Board evaluation; extent of
Board evaluation globally; significant requirements in
India; predictable barriers and challenges; case example of
Board leadership from India; recommended practices
worldwide; and future trends and challenges. |
format |
Working Paper |
author |
Larson, Mary Jo Pierce, Chris |
author_facet |
Larson, Mary Jo Pierce, Chris |
author_sort |
Larson, Mary Jo |
title |
Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond |
title_short |
Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond |
title_full |
Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond |
title_fullStr |
Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond |
title_full_unstemmed |
Board Evaluations : Insights from India and Beyond |
title_sort |
board evaluations : insights from india and beyond |
publisher |
International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/06/24606693/board-evaluations-insights-india-beyond http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22146 |
_version_ |
1764450081026605056 |