Measuring Inequality from Top to Bottom

This paper presents a new methodology to measure inequality that optimally combines household survey information and tax records to construct a complete income distribution. Combining the two data sources is necessary because, on the one hand, hous...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Diaz-Bazan, Tania
Format: Working Paper
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/04/24353317/measuring-inequality-top-bottom
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21851
id okr-10986-21851
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-218512021-04-23T14:04:05Z Measuring Inequality from Top to Bottom Diaz-Bazan, Tania INCOME DATA HOUSEHOLD#SURVEYS EQUITY INCOME TAXES HOUSEHOLD SURVEY REDUCING POVERTY LABOR INCOME INCOME#TAX ITS TAX RATE WAGES POLICIES CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION TRANSPARENCY INCOME INTEREST DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS EXCHANGE INCOME GROUP DATA COLLECTION LABOR FORCE MEAN INCOME INCOME DISTRIBUTION INCOME SOURCES DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME TOTAL POPULATION INCOMES DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS POLICY DISCUSSIONS SHARES HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA TAX INCOME TAX SURVEYS MINIMUM INCOME PENSION TAX REVENUE INDIVIDUAL#INCOMES RENTS CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION ECONOMIC INEQUALITY TAXPAYER PERSONAL INCOME TAX DATA SETS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DATA SET SHARE DEVELOPING ECONOMY INCOME SHARES TAX SYSTEM CAPITAL GAINS AVERAGE ANNUAL INEQUALITY MEASURES INCOME INEQUALITY INDIVIDUAL INCOMES PERSONAL INCOME AVERAGE INCOME TAXPAYERS GINI COEFFICIENT TAX LIABILITIES SURVEY DATA HOUSEHOLD#SURVEY TRANSFERS POLICY RESEARCH MEASUREMENT ERROR HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS MEASURING INEQUALITY DEMOGRAPHIC INCOME LEVELS PRODUCT GINI# COEFFICIENT INCOME LEVEL ECONOMIC RESEARCH TAXES INEQUALITY This paper presents a new methodology to measure inequality that optimally combines household survey information and tax records to construct a complete income distribution. Combining the two data sources is necessary because, on the one hand, household surveys do not accurately represent the wealthiest segment of the population, while tax records do; on the other hand, the opposite is true for the lower end of the income distribution: tax records only include incomes above a certain threshold. The key innovation of the proposed methodology—and the main difference from the existing literature—is the choice of an optimal income threshold b. The Gini coefficient for the population is then computed combining the conditional income distributions for incomes below b (using household survey data) and above b (using tax records). Central to this methodology is the fact that b is not chosen arbitrarily: it should be determined in such a way as to minimize reliance on household survey data to compute the top of the income distribution. In practice, the optimal b corresponds to the minimum income level that triggers mandatory tax filing. The proposed methodology is applied to the case of Colombia. 2015-05-04T19:30:46Z 2015-05-04T19:30:46Z 2015-04 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/04/24353317/measuring-inequality-top-bottom http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21851 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 7237 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Colombia
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic INCOME DATA
HOUSEHOLD#SURVEYS
EQUITY
INCOME TAXES
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
REDUCING POVERTY
LABOR INCOME
INCOME#TAX
ITS
TAX RATE
WAGES
POLICIES
CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
TRANSPARENCY
INCOME
INTEREST
DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION
INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS
EXCHANGE
INCOME GROUP
DATA COLLECTION
LABOR FORCE
MEAN INCOME
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
INCOME SOURCES
DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME
TOTAL POPULATION
INCOMES
DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
POLICY DISCUSSIONS
SHARES
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA
TAX
INCOME TAX
SURVEYS
MINIMUM INCOME
PENSION
TAX REVENUE
INDIVIDUAL#INCOMES
RENTS
CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION
ECONOMIC INEQUALITY
TAXPAYER
PERSONAL INCOME TAX
DATA SETS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DATA SET
SHARE
DEVELOPING ECONOMY
INCOME SHARES
TAX SYSTEM
CAPITAL GAINS
AVERAGE ANNUAL
INEQUALITY MEASURES
INCOME INEQUALITY
INDIVIDUAL INCOMES
PERSONAL INCOME
AVERAGE INCOME
TAXPAYERS
GINI COEFFICIENT
TAX LIABILITIES
SURVEY DATA
HOUSEHOLD#SURVEY
TRANSFERS
POLICY RESEARCH
MEASUREMENT ERROR
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
MEASURING INEQUALITY
DEMOGRAPHIC
INCOME LEVELS
PRODUCT
GINI# COEFFICIENT
INCOME LEVEL
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
TAXES
INEQUALITY
spellingShingle INCOME DATA
HOUSEHOLD#SURVEYS
EQUITY
INCOME TAXES
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
REDUCING POVERTY
LABOR INCOME
INCOME#TAX
ITS
TAX RATE
WAGES
POLICIES
CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
TRANSPARENCY
INCOME
INTEREST
DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION
INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS
EXCHANGE
INCOME GROUP
DATA COLLECTION
LABOR FORCE
MEAN INCOME
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
INCOME SOURCES
DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME
TOTAL POPULATION
INCOMES
DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
POLICY DISCUSSIONS
SHARES
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA
TAX
INCOME TAX
SURVEYS
MINIMUM INCOME
PENSION
TAX REVENUE
INDIVIDUAL#INCOMES
RENTS
CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION
ECONOMIC INEQUALITY
TAXPAYER
PERSONAL INCOME TAX
DATA SETS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DATA SET
SHARE
DEVELOPING ECONOMY
INCOME SHARES
TAX SYSTEM
CAPITAL GAINS
AVERAGE ANNUAL
INEQUALITY MEASURES
INCOME INEQUALITY
INDIVIDUAL INCOMES
PERSONAL INCOME
AVERAGE INCOME
TAXPAYERS
GINI COEFFICIENT
TAX LIABILITIES
SURVEY DATA
HOUSEHOLD#SURVEY
TRANSFERS
POLICY RESEARCH
MEASUREMENT ERROR
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
MEASURING INEQUALITY
DEMOGRAPHIC
INCOME LEVELS
PRODUCT
GINI# COEFFICIENT
INCOME LEVEL
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
TAXES
INEQUALITY
Diaz-Bazan, Tania
Measuring Inequality from Top to Bottom
geographic_facet Colombia
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No. 7237
description This paper presents a new methodology to measure inequality that optimally combines household survey information and tax records to construct a complete income distribution. Combining the two data sources is necessary because, on the one hand, household surveys do not accurately represent the wealthiest segment of the population, while tax records do; on the other hand, the opposite is true for the lower end of the income distribution: tax records only include incomes above a certain threshold. The key innovation of the proposed methodology—and the main difference from the existing literature—is the choice of an optimal income threshold b. The Gini coefficient for the population is then computed combining the conditional income distributions for incomes below b (using household survey data) and above b (using tax records). Central to this methodology is the fact that b is not chosen arbitrarily: it should be determined in such a way as to minimize reliance on household survey data to compute the top of the income distribution. In practice, the optimal b corresponds to the minimum income level that triggers mandatory tax filing. The proposed methodology is applied to the case of Colombia.
format Working Paper
author Diaz-Bazan, Tania
author_facet Diaz-Bazan, Tania
author_sort Diaz-Bazan, Tania
title Measuring Inequality from Top to Bottom
title_short Measuring Inequality from Top to Bottom
title_full Measuring Inequality from Top to Bottom
title_fullStr Measuring Inequality from Top to Bottom
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Inequality from Top to Bottom
title_sort measuring inequality from top to bottom
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2015
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/04/24353317/measuring-inequality-top-bottom
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21851
_version_ 1764449434322599936