Should African Rural Development Strategies Depend on Smallholder Farms? An Exploration of the Inverse-Productivity Hypothesis
In Africa, most development strategies include efforts to improve the productivity of staple crops grown on smallholder farms. An underlying premise is that small farms are productive in the African context and that smallholders do not forgo economies of scale—a premise supported by the often observ...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Wiley
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21414 |
id |
okr-10986-21414 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-214142021-04-23T14:04:02Z Should African Rural Development Strategies Depend on Smallholder Farms? An Exploration of the Inverse-Productivity Hypothesis Larson, Donald F. Otsuka, Keijiro Matsumoto, Tomoya Kilic, Talip Agriculture Inverse productivity Farm size Smallholders Technology choice In Africa, most development strategies include efforts to improve the productivity of staple crops grown on smallholder farms. An underlying premise is that small farms are productive in the African context and that smallholders do not forgo economies of scale—a premise supported by the often observed phenomenon that staple cereal yields decline as the scale of production increases. This article explores a research design conundrum that encourages researchers who study the relationship between productivity and scale to use surveys with a narrow geographic reach in order to produce more reliable results, even though results are better suited for policy decisions when they are based on data that are broadly representative. Using a model of endogenous technology choice, we explore the relationship between maize yields and scale using alternative data. Since rich descriptions of the decision environments that farmers face are needed to identify the applied technologies that generate the data, improvements in the location specificity of the data should reduce the likelihood of identification errors and biased estimates. However, our analysis finds that the inverse-productivity hypothesis holds up well across a broad platform of data, despite obvious shortcomings with some components. It also finds surprising consistency in the estimated scale elasticities. 2015-02-05T23:28:21Z 2015-02-05T23:28:21Z 2013-09-03 Journal Article Agricultural Economics http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21414 en_US Attribution for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms of Conditions http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-817011.html World Bank Wiley Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Journal Article Sub-Saharan Africa |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
en_US |
topic |
Agriculture Inverse productivity Farm size Smallholders Technology choice |
spellingShingle |
Agriculture Inverse productivity Farm size Smallholders Technology choice Larson, Donald F. Otsuka, Keijiro Matsumoto, Tomoya Kilic, Talip Should African Rural Development Strategies Depend on Smallholder Farms? An Exploration of the Inverse-Productivity Hypothesis |
geographic_facet |
Sub-Saharan Africa |
description |
In Africa, most development strategies include efforts to improve the productivity of staple crops grown on smallholder farms. An underlying premise is that small farms are productive in the African context and that smallholders do not forgo economies of scale—a premise supported by the often observed phenomenon that staple cereal yields decline as the scale of production increases. This article explores a research design conundrum that encourages researchers who study the relationship between productivity and scale to use surveys with a narrow geographic reach in order to produce more reliable results, even though results are better suited for policy decisions when they are based on data that are broadly representative. Using a model of endogenous technology choice, we explore the relationship between maize yields and scale using alternative data. Since rich descriptions of the decision environments that farmers face are needed to identify the applied technologies that generate the data, improvements in the location specificity of the data should reduce the likelihood of identification errors and biased estimates. However, our analysis finds that the inverse-productivity hypothesis holds up well across a broad platform of data, despite obvious shortcomings with some components. It also finds surprising consistency in the estimated scale elasticities. |
format |
Journal Article |
author |
Larson, Donald F. Otsuka, Keijiro Matsumoto, Tomoya Kilic, Talip |
author_facet |
Larson, Donald F. Otsuka, Keijiro Matsumoto, Tomoya Kilic, Talip |
author_sort |
Larson, Donald F. |
title |
Should African Rural Development Strategies Depend on Smallholder Farms? An Exploration of the Inverse-Productivity Hypothesis |
title_short |
Should African Rural Development Strategies Depend on Smallholder Farms? An Exploration of the Inverse-Productivity Hypothesis |
title_full |
Should African Rural Development Strategies Depend on Smallholder Farms? An Exploration of the Inverse-Productivity Hypothesis |
title_fullStr |
Should African Rural Development Strategies Depend on Smallholder Farms? An Exploration of the Inverse-Productivity Hypothesis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Should African Rural Development Strategies Depend on Smallholder Farms? An Exploration of the Inverse-Productivity Hypothesis |
title_sort |
should african rural development strategies depend on smallholder farms? an exploration of the inverse-productivity hypothesis |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21414 |
_version_ |
1764448193798471680 |