Mongolia : The Politics of Public Investment

Why do politicians distort public investments? And given that public investments are poor, because presumably that is what is politically rational, what types of reforms are likely to be both Efficiency improving and compatible with the interests o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hasnain, Zahid
Format: Public Investment Review
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/01/23068831/mongolia-politics-public-investment
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21050
id okr-10986-21050
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-210502021-04-23T14:04:00Z Mongolia : The Politics of Public Investment Hasnain, Zahid ACCOUNTING BID BIDDING BIDS BUDGETING CHECKS COLLUSION CORRUPTION CREDIBILITY DEBTS DEFICITS ENROLLMENT EXPENDITURE EXPENDITURES EXTERNALITY GDP INCOME INEFFICIENCY INFLATION INVENTORY INVESTING INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIABILITY PORTFOLIO PUBLIC PUBLIC INVESTMENT PUBLIC INVESTMENTS PUBLIC SECTOR RENTS REPAYMENT RETURN TAKEOVER TAX TENDERING TRANSPARENCY URBANIZATION VOTERS WAGES WEALTH Why do politicians distort public investments? And given that public investments are poor, because presumably that is what is politically rational, what types of reforms are likely to be both Efficiency improving and compatible with the interests of politicians? This chapter explores these two questions in the context of Mongolia. It argues that Mongolian members of parliament MPs have an incentive to over spend on smaller projects that bring benefits to specific geographical localities and to under spend on large infrastructure that will bring economic benefits to Mongolia on the whole. The incentive for the former is that MPs internalize the political benefits from the provision of particular, targeted benefits to specific communities. This chapter is inductive in its structure. First, the broader public expenditure patterns in Mongolia are analyzed in order to identify policy maker s priorities that are, revealed preferences. Then the public investment management system is examined in depth, identifying the main Technical and structural weaknesses in the system. Following that is an analysis of the interests of Key political actors that are served by poor investments. Given these political incentives, the final section proposes some incentive compatible reform options. 2014-12-31T16:00:39Z 2014-12-31T16:00:39Z 2014 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/01/23068831/mongolia-politics-public-investment http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21050 English en_US CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank, Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work :: Public Investment Review East Asia and Pacific Mongolia
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic ACCOUNTING
BID
BIDDING
BIDS
BUDGETING
CHECKS
COLLUSION
CORRUPTION
CREDIBILITY
DEBTS
DEFICITS
ENROLLMENT
EXPENDITURE
EXPENDITURES
EXTERNALITY
GDP
INCOME
INEFFICIENCY
INFLATION
INVENTORY
INVESTING
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
LIABILITY
PORTFOLIO
PUBLIC
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
PUBLIC SECTOR
RENTS
REPAYMENT
RETURN
TAKEOVER
TAX
TENDERING
TRANSPARENCY
URBANIZATION
VOTERS
WAGES
WEALTH
spellingShingle ACCOUNTING
BID
BIDDING
BIDS
BUDGETING
CHECKS
COLLUSION
CORRUPTION
CREDIBILITY
DEBTS
DEFICITS
ENROLLMENT
EXPENDITURE
EXPENDITURES
EXTERNALITY
GDP
INCOME
INEFFICIENCY
INFLATION
INVENTORY
INVESTING
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
LIABILITY
PORTFOLIO
PUBLIC
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
PUBLIC SECTOR
RENTS
REPAYMENT
RETURN
TAKEOVER
TAX
TENDERING
TRANSPARENCY
URBANIZATION
VOTERS
WAGES
WEALTH
Hasnain, Zahid
Mongolia : The Politics of Public Investment
geographic_facet East Asia and Pacific
Mongolia
description Why do politicians distort public investments? And given that public investments are poor, because presumably that is what is politically rational, what types of reforms are likely to be both Efficiency improving and compatible with the interests of politicians? This chapter explores these two questions in the context of Mongolia. It argues that Mongolian members of parliament MPs have an incentive to over spend on smaller projects that bring benefits to specific geographical localities and to under spend on large infrastructure that will bring economic benefits to Mongolia on the whole. The incentive for the former is that MPs internalize the political benefits from the provision of particular, targeted benefits to specific communities. This chapter is inductive in its structure. First, the broader public expenditure patterns in Mongolia are analyzed in order to identify policy maker s priorities that are, revealed preferences. Then the public investment management system is examined in depth, identifying the main Technical and structural weaknesses in the system. Following that is an analysis of the interests of Key political actors that are served by poor investments. Given these political incentives, the final section proposes some incentive compatible reform options.
format Economic & Sector Work :: Public Investment Review
author Hasnain, Zahid
author_facet Hasnain, Zahid
author_sort Hasnain, Zahid
title Mongolia : The Politics of Public Investment
title_short Mongolia : The Politics of Public Investment
title_full Mongolia : The Politics of Public Investment
title_fullStr Mongolia : The Politics of Public Investment
title_full_unstemmed Mongolia : The Politics of Public Investment
title_sort mongolia : the politics of public investment
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2014
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/01/23068831/mongolia-politics-public-investment
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21050
_version_ 1764447621997395968