Revenue Sharing of Natural Resources in Africa : Reflections from a Review of International Practices
The African continent is one of the world richest regions in oil, gas and minerals. Proven reserves have expanded and prospects improved recently making the continent an important player on the world stage. The share of natural resources in GDP is...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Mining/Oil and Gas |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/04/20153249/revenue-sharing-natural-resources-africa-reflections-review-international-practices http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20062 |
Summary: | The African continent is one of the
world richest regions in oil, gas and minerals. Proven
reserves have expanded and prospects improved recently
making the continent an important player on the world stage.
The share of natural resources in GDP is increasing rapidly.
Exports of minerals and hydrocarbons account for more than a
quarter of total exports in half of the sub-Saharan
economies and the share of natural resources revenue (NRR)
on total government revenue is expected to become dominant
for an increasing number of countries. Wealth of natural
resources offers opportunities but it also brings in
challenges. Natural resources have generally been linked to
a series of negative outcomes like economic decline,
corruption and autocratic rule (McNeish, 2010). Oil and
minerals reserves are often point source natural
resources, being usually very spatially concentrated. Their
discovery becomes almost inevitably a potential source of
conflict between the governments, the people of the
producing areas and those of the rest of the country (Fearon
and Laitin, 2003). In other words, intergovernmental sharing
is a big issue that needs a solution when natural resources
are discovered and exploited. Full centralization of NNR is
the exception rather than the rule, as we will observe in
the paper. It is practiced for oil and gas by both
autocratic regimes (such as Saudi Arabia and other Middle
East countries), and fully fledged democratic systems, such
as Norway and the UK. Full centralization does not imply,
however, the absence of compensating mechanisms, or of
indirect transfers in favor of the governments of the
producing areas. In the UK, for example, Scotland receives
no share of oil taxes, but is compensated with a larger
share of block grants to local governments (the Barnett
formula ). Norway rewards the local governments closer to
the producing areas with generous infrastructure projects,
such as tunnels and bridges linking very sparsely populated
areas and islands. Autocratic countries may also use
repression to quench the request for a share of NRR from
their producing areas. |
---|