When Do Special Interests Run Rampant? Disentangling the Role in Banking Crises of Elections, Incomplete Information, and Checks and Balances
The author investigates the political determinants of government decisions that benefit special interest groups - especially government decisions to deal with banking crises. He finds that the better informed the voters, the more proximate elections, and the larger the number of political veto playe...
Main Author: | Keefer, Philip |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19966 |
Similar Items
-
Elections, Special Interests, and the Fiscal Costs of Financial Crisis
by: Keefer, Philip
Published: (2013) -
Checks and Balances, Private Information, and the Credibility of Monetary Commitments
by: Keefer, Philip, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Beyond Legal Origin and Checks and Balances : Political Credibility, Citizen Information, and Financial Sector Development
by: Keefer, Philip
Published: (2012) -
Controlling the Fiscal Costs of Banking Crises
by: Honohan, Patrick, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Lion rampant
by: Woollcombe
Published: (1955)