Should Capital Flows Be Regulated? A Look at the Issues and Policies
The author argues that externalities in financial markets, implicit and explicit guarantees on financial transactions, and information asymmetries in financial markets that may exacerbate contagion provide a rationale for a government role in manag...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2000/03/438338/capital-flows-regulated-look-issues-policies http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19844 |
| Summary: | The author argues that externalities in
financial markets, implicit and explicit guarantees on
financial transactions, and information asymmetries in
financial markets that may exacerbate contagion provide a
rationale for a government role in managing the risk
associated with cross-border capital flows. Governments can
complement private sector risk management with measures that
help deal with the volatility of capital flows. These
measures include those that control the type and volume of
capital flows and those that help investors make better
investment decisions, and that may reduce herding behavior,
such as better information provision. The main instruments
that have been tried or recommended since the onset of the
recent financial crises can be grouped in several
categories. 1) Debt management: The composition, maturity
structure, and level of external debt have played an
important role in financial crises. High short-term debt
relative to liquid assets has been found to be consistently
correlated with financial crises in recent times.
Governments can affect the level of debt (including private
debt) and its composition, though the mix of policies they
use will vary. Prudential regulation in the financial
sector, corporate sector regulation, and restrictions on
capital movements have all been used with varying success to
change the level and composition of external debt. 2) Other
macroeconomic policies: Most countries that have suffered
macroeconomic crises have had fixed exchange rate systems;
some have not. But whether or not a country has a fixed
exchange rate is not the relevant question. The question is
instead whether there is reason to expect a significant
weakening of the currency, possibly as a result of a change
in policy stance. Large real exchange rate appreciations
have been among the main reasons for runs on currency;
macroeconomic policy needs to be aimed at managing these.
With a fixed exchange rate regime, flexibility must be
maintained elsewhere in the economy. Policymakers may need
to make tradeoffs between price and output stability once
market jitters have set in. There is no single right answer
to the question of which to emphasize more at a given time;
it depends on a country's circumstances. 3) Risk
management in the financial sector: The health of the
financial sector is related to the government's fiscal
position, its macroeconomic policies, and financial crises.
The regulatory and supervisory frameworks in developing
countries need to be adapted to the special features of
these markets. Many developing countries are subject to
frequent trade and capital account shocks, while lacking the
means to deal with these shocks, such as adequate insurance
markets. This situation may call for policies that nor only
affect the incentives of lenders, but also help manage risk
more directly. Examples of such policies include maturity,
and liquidity requirements. 4) Information and transparency:
More disclosure of information and improvements in the
quality of that information could reduce the volatility that
arises from herding behavior. Ex ante, they may also have a
beneficial effect on the allocation of capital. |
|---|