Optimal Use of Carbon Sequestration in a Global Climate Change Strategy : Is there a Wooden Bridge to a Clean Energy Future?

s. Whether it should be part of a global climate mitigation strategy, however, remains controversial. One of the key issues is that, contrary to emission abatement, carbon sequestration might not be permanent. But some argue that even temporary seq...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lecocq, Franck, Chomitz, Kenneth
Format: Policy Research Working Paper
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/07/1551997/optimal-use-carbon-sequestration-global-climate-change-strategy-wooden-bridge-clean-energy-future
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19580
id okr-10986-19580
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-195802021-04-23T14:03:43Z Optimal Use of Carbon Sequestration in a Global Climate Change Strategy : Is there a Wooden Bridge to a Clean Energy Future? Lecocq, Franck Chomitz, Kenneth ABATEMENT ABATEMENT COST ABATEMENT COSTS ABATEMENT POTENTIAL AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION AGRICULTURAL LAND ALTERNATIVE ENERGY ANTHROPOGENIC EMISSIONS ATMOSPHERE ATMOSPHERIC CARBON ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE BASELINE EMISSIONS BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION BIOMASS BUSINESS AS USUAL SCENARIO CARBON CARBON CYCLE CARBON CYCLE MODEL CARBON DIOXIDE CARBON DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS CARBON PRICE CARBON RELEASE CARBON RISES CARBON SEQUESTRATION CHEMISTRY CLEAN ENERGY CLIMATE POLICY CO CO2 CO2 EMISSIONS COSTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE DAMAGE FUNCTION DEEP LAYERS DEFORESTATION DIFFUSION ECONOMIC GROWTH EMISSION EMISSION ABATEMENT EMISSION REDUCTION EMISSION REDUCTION PROJECT EMISSIONS EMISSIONS ABATEMENT EMISSIONS REDUCTION EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS ENERGY SOURCES EQUILIBRIUM EXTERNALITIES FOSSIL FUEL FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION FUEL FUEL EMISSION FUELS GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE IPCC LAND USE MARGINAL ABATEMENT MARGINAL ABATEMENT COST MARGINAL ABATEMENT COSTS MARGINAL COST MARGINAL COSTS MITIGATING CLIMATE CHANGE OCEANS OPPORTUNITY COSTS OPTIMIZATION MODEL OSCILLATIONS PRODUCTIVITY PROGRAMS REDUCTION IN EMISSIONS RESERVOIRS SHADOW PRICE SHADOW PRICES SOIL SOILS STABILIZATION SURFACE TEMPERATURE TIMBER TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM TROPICAL DEFORESTATION TROPICAL FOREST WATERSHED s. Whether it should be part of a global climate mitigation strategy, however, remains controversial. One of the key issues is that, contrary to emission abatement, carbon sequestration might not be permanent. But some argue that even temporary sequestration is beneficial as it delays climate change impacts and "buys" time for technical change in the energy sector. To rigorously assess these arguments, the authors build an international optimization model in which both sequestration and abatement can be used to mitigate climate change. They confirm that permanent sequestration, if feasible, can be overall part of a climate mitigation strategy. When permanence can be guaranteed, sequestration is equivalent to fossil-fuel emissions abatement. The optimal use of temporary sequestration, on the other hand, depends mostly on marginal damages of climate change. Temporary sequestration projects starting now, in particular, are not attractive if marginal damages of climate change at current concentration levels are assumed to be low. 2014-08-21T18:55:16Z 2014-08-21T18:55:16Z 2001-07 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/07/1551997/optimal-use-carbon-sequestration-global-climate-change-strategy-wooden-bridge-clean-energy-future http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19580 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 2635 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic ABATEMENT
ABATEMENT COST
ABATEMENT COSTS
ABATEMENT POTENTIAL
AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION
AGRICULTURAL LAND
ALTERNATIVE ENERGY
ANTHROPOGENIC EMISSIONS
ATMOSPHERE
ATMOSPHERIC CARBON
ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE
BASELINE EMISSIONS
BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
BIOMASS
BUSINESS AS USUAL SCENARIO
CARBON
CARBON CYCLE
CARBON CYCLE MODEL
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION
CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS
CARBON PRICE
CARBON RELEASE
CARBON RISES
CARBON SEQUESTRATION
CHEMISTRY
CLEAN ENERGY
CLIMATE POLICY
CO
CO2
CO2 EMISSIONS
COSTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE
DAMAGE FUNCTION
DEEP LAYERS
DEFORESTATION
DIFFUSION
ECONOMIC GROWTH
EMISSION
EMISSION ABATEMENT
EMISSION REDUCTION
EMISSION REDUCTION PROJECT
EMISSIONS
EMISSIONS ABATEMENT
EMISSIONS REDUCTION
EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS
ENERGY SOURCES
EQUILIBRIUM
EXTERNALITIES
FOSSIL FUEL
FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION
FUEL
FUEL EMISSION
FUELS
GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE
IPCC
LAND USE
MARGINAL ABATEMENT
MARGINAL ABATEMENT COST
MARGINAL ABATEMENT COSTS
MARGINAL COST
MARGINAL COSTS
MITIGATING CLIMATE CHANGE
OCEANS
OPPORTUNITY COSTS
OPTIMIZATION MODEL
OSCILLATIONS
PRODUCTIVITY
PROGRAMS
REDUCTION IN EMISSIONS
RESERVOIRS
SHADOW PRICE
SHADOW PRICES
SOIL
SOILS
STABILIZATION
SURFACE TEMPERATURE
TIMBER
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
TROPICAL DEFORESTATION
TROPICAL FOREST
WATERSHED
spellingShingle ABATEMENT
ABATEMENT COST
ABATEMENT COSTS
ABATEMENT POTENTIAL
AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION
AGRICULTURAL LAND
ALTERNATIVE ENERGY
ANTHROPOGENIC EMISSIONS
ATMOSPHERE
ATMOSPHERIC CARBON
ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE
BASELINE EMISSIONS
BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
BIOMASS
BUSINESS AS USUAL SCENARIO
CARBON
CARBON CYCLE
CARBON CYCLE MODEL
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION
CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS
CARBON PRICE
CARBON RELEASE
CARBON RISES
CARBON SEQUESTRATION
CHEMISTRY
CLEAN ENERGY
CLIMATE POLICY
CO
CO2
CO2 EMISSIONS
COSTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE
DAMAGE FUNCTION
DEEP LAYERS
DEFORESTATION
DIFFUSION
ECONOMIC GROWTH
EMISSION
EMISSION ABATEMENT
EMISSION REDUCTION
EMISSION REDUCTION PROJECT
EMISSIONS
EMISSIONS ABATEMENT
EMISSIONS REDUCTION
EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS
ENERGY SOURCES
EQUILIBRIUM
EXTERNALITIES
FOSSIL FUEL
FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION
FUEL
FUEL EMISSION
FUELS
GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE
IPCC
LAND USE
MARGINAL ABATEMENT
MARGINAL ABATEMENT COST
MARGINAL ABATEMENT COSTS
MARGINAL COST
MARGINAL COSTS
MITIGATING CLIMATE CHANGE
OCEANS
OPPORTUNITY COSTS
OPTIMIZATION MODEL
OSCILLATIONS
PRODUCTIVITY
PROGRAMS
REDUCTION IN EMISSIONS
RESERVOIRS
SHADOW PRICE
SHADOW PRICES
SOIL
SOILS
STABILIZATION
SURFACE TEMPERATURE
TIMBER
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
TROPICAL DEFORESTATION
TROPICAL FOREST
WATERSHED
Lecocq, Franck
Chomitz, Kenneth
Optimal Use of Carbon Sequestration in a Global Climate Change Strategy : Is there a Wooden Bridge to a Clean Energy Future?
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No. 2635
description s. Whether it should be part of a global climate mitigation strategy, however, remains controversial. One of the key issues is that, contrary to emission abatement, carbon sequestration might not be permanent. But some argue that even temporary sequestration is beneficial as it delays climate change impacts and "buys" time for technical change in the energy sector. To rigorously assess these arguments, the authors build an international optimization model in which both sequestration and abatement can be used to mitigate climate change. They confirm that permanent sequestration, if feasible, can be overall part of a climate mitigation strategy. When permanence can be guaranteed, sequestration is equivalent to fossil-fuel emissions abatement. The optimal use of temporary sequestration, on the other hand, depends mostly on marginal damages of climate change. Temporary sequestration projects starting now, in particular, are not attractive if marginal damages of climate change at current concentration levels are assumed to be low.
format Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
author Lecocq, Franck
Chomitz, Kenneth
author_facet Lecocq, Franck
Chomitz, Kenneth
author_sort Lecocq, Franck
title Optimal Use of Carbon Sequestration in a Global Climate Change Strategy : Is there a Wooden Bridge to a Clean Energy Future?
title_short Optimal Use of Carbon Sequestration in a Global Climate Change Strategy : Is there a Wooden Bridge to a Clean Energy Future?
title_full Optimal Use of Carbon Sequestration in a Global Climate Change Strategy : Is there a Wooden Bridge to a Clean Energy Future?
title_fullStr Optimal Use of Carbon Sequestration in a Global Climate Change Strategy : Is there a Wooden Bridge to a Clean Energy Future?
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Use of Carbon Sequestration in a Global Climate Change Strategy : Is there a Wooden Bridge to a Clean Energy Future?
title_sort optimal use of carbon sequestration in a global climate change strategy : is there a wooden bridge to a clean energy future?
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2014
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/07/1551997/optimal-use-carbon-sequestration-global-climate-change-strategy-wooden-bridge-clean-energy-future
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19580
_version_ 1764440069386534912