Poverty, Education, and Health in Indonesia : Who Benefits from Public Spending?
The authors investigate the extent to which Indonesia's poor benefit from public and private provisioning of education and health services. Drawing on multiple rounds of SUSENAS household surveys, they document a reversal in the rate of declin...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/12/1660258/poverty-education-health-indonesia-benefits-public-spending http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19406 |
Summary: | The authors investigate the extent to
which Indonesia's poor benefit from public and private
provisioning of education and health services. Drawing on
multiple rounds of SUSENAS household surveys, they document
a reversal in the rate of decline in poverty and a slowdown
in social sector improvements resulting from the economic
crisis in the second half of the 1990s. Carrying out
traditional static benefit-incidence analysis of public
spending in education and health, the authors find patterns
consistent with experience in other countries: spending on
primary education and primary health care tends to be
pro-poor, while spending on higher education and hospitals
is less obviously beneficial to the poor. These conclusions
are tempered once one allows for economies of scale in
consumption which weaken the link between poverty status and
household size. The authors also examine the incidence of
changes in government spending. They find that the marginal
incidence of spending in both junior and senior secondary
schooling is more progressive than what static analysis
would suggest, consistent with "early capture" by
the non-poor of education spending. In the health sector
marginal and average incidence analysis point to the same
conclusion: the greatest benefit to the poor would come from
an increase in primary health care spending. |
---|