The Government Monitoring and Evaluation System in India : A Work in Progress
This paper is discusses the evolution of India s approach to monitoring and evaluation of government programs. It is organized into 8 sections. (1) Describes the Indian government structure and sets the context for the challenges of building a gove...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank Group, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/10/19601217/government-monitoring-evaluation-system-india-work-progress http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19000 |
Summary: | This paper is discusses the evolution of
India s approach to monitoring and evaluation of government
programs. It is organized into 8 sections. (1) Describes the
Indian government structure and sets the context for the
challenges of building a government-wide M&E system in
India. (2) Outlines a short history of the evaluation system
under the planning commission and its stages of development.
(3) Examines the demand side of evaluation the sources of
demand for accountability, especially in recent years, and
for evaluation in particular, and the locus of decisions
regarding the selection of which programs to monitor and
evaluate. (4) Discusses supply-side and operational issues
such as staffing and capacity, and technical approaches
(including the type or range of methodology applied). This
section also examines the role of the private sector, think
tanks, and civil society. (5) Examines the new institutional
arrangements M&E. This section also examines the state
of management information systems (MISs), outcome budgeting
encouraged by the Ministry of Finance, and the performance
management system as it operates in India. (6) Discusses the
new Independent Evaluation Office (which became functional
recently, in 2013). (7) Highlights the fiscal issues
underpinning the emerging accountability and effectiveness
processes. It outlines the current system of fiscal
transfers from the center to the states and the highly
centralized central-state fiscal relations, and how they may
affect performance and evaluation. (8) Concludes with some
observations about ways forward. |
---|